If you could design a ski...

145-113-138

something like that. medium flex, simple graphics, maybe wood effect topsheet with minimalist design on.
 
probably around 117 - 110 - 117, wood core with some type of reinforcement under the foot to prevent bindings ripping out.

would be light, flexable but not super flexy, and have lots of pop. cant decide on weather or not to be 100% symmetrical though
 
125-108-125, light, soft tip and tail, burtons honey combe core but in a ski. titinal insert strips under bindings for torsional stiffness and stopping bindings ripping out, flat camber with long rise tip and tails true twin tips atleast 50mm rise and a top thatwould never chip.
 
113-84-110, and like a metal cap piece on the tail and tip to stop de-lams, and some ill graphics
 
130-140-120-135-125

130-140 would be slightly rockered. nothing insane

140-120-135 would be traditional sidecut and traditional camber

135-125 would be slightly rockered like the tip.

The ski would fairly stiff since the rocker would push the ski up in deep snow anyways. tail definitely would be stiffer then the tip for stomping cliffs.
 
147-120-140 Rockered, soft tip and tail Center mount
125-100-125 Slightly rockered Even flex and mildy buttery to medium flex Center mount
120-90-120 meduim stiffness Center mount
 
170 155 160

graphics from the jon olsson pro, you would be able to see more of the girls,

why would you want anything else
 
129-98-120

190 length Wood core, titanium underfoot. Butterable, but pretty stiff otherwise. Square tips like moments,

and probably get kislevitz to do the graphic if I had the choice.

 
130-95-125 rocker soft tip, the tails a little stiffer for landing drops, center mnt so you can land drops in a center stance, awesome art work that i would make for it

 
123-93-123

id want it really light and a medium flex... more towards the buttery side. strong topsheet too so you dont chip it a lot
 
hellbents sidecut end ep pro flex and bacons graphics... pretty much haha

except it would measure 176, and have a bit less rocker than bents.
 
105-64-92, 190 cm. softer in the tip, gets progressively stiffer towards the baseplate and tip. mounted where they mount race skis. for racing.

jk

how about 81mm ar6's that are as stiff as the last of the ar5's in a 183, but sidecut is centered at 2 cm back from true running length center.
 
and they would be pretty light, for the core it would be very light flexy wood that is very strong, and the midfoot would be stiffer than the tail and tip. and maybe an ollie band to give it some more pop in the powder.
 
181cm: 130-100-125

dual camber, light and poppy, medium symetric flex.

and for the graphics
9-929-Z000XWNX.jpg
 
pretty light for spins and hiking, relatively stiff for stability on landings and charging through chopped up snow, symmetrical or very close to symmetrical sidecut, probably in the 90-100ish mm waist range, and a very small hint of rocker in the tips and tail for nice forward and switch landings in powder, as well as better smearage and butters. probably bamboo core, for its pop and lightness; very durable,fast base: thick edges for durability on rails. Graphics would be a fun project to design.
 
120-92-120 normal camber under foot then rockered, soft flex, then butter zones like 5 or 6 inches in front of toe piece and 5 or 6 inches behind heel. symetrical, 177 length, and neon pink with teal and pruple poka dots on the top, and the base would say FUN! in big letters over and over again on each ski.
it may not work well for big jumps but i think it would be the most fun possible on skis.
 
about 400-75-63 and reverse sidecut and reverse camber

but for real i have no clue what i would want in a ski, i will have to mull it over in my mind and come back later
 
I'd probably do something like 140-90-140 or maybe more in the tips and tails so it would have a super tight elliptical side cut. It would be symmetrical with a medium flex.
 
186 Long, 138-120-138 with a half inch rocker. Bamboo sidewalls, and core. Pretty soft, sick topsheet... anyone know what I'm on about?
 
if you have a ski that is built like that, you would def. want to center it... if it has that sidecut and isn't built symetrical, then it would be a really messed up turning arc.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top