If a woman transitions to a man, should it be required to sign up for the draft?

steeze_louise

steeze_louise

Member
Genuine question, if a military age woman decides that she feels like a man and claims that she is one and all of that jazz, should it be required to accept the responsibility of military age men and sign up for the draft?
 
We haven't drafted people since Vietnam. Who the fuck cares? I'm much more worried about rich people dodging the draft than trannys. Thanks to the military-industrial complex and our enormous standing army, our country has an endless supply of poor people to fight wars for the rich.
 
14300955:Craw_Daddy said:
We haven't drafted people since Vietnam. Who the fuck cares? I'm much more worried about rich people dodging the draft than trannys. Thanks to the military-industrial complex and our enormous standing army, our country has an endless supply of poor people to fight wars for the rich.
Click to expand...

we have not actually drafted people since Vietnam but 18 year old men are still required to sign up for it.
 
14300962:steeze_louise said:
we have not actually drafted people since Vietnam but 18 year old men are still required to sign up for it.
Click to expand...

Yeah, we're required to sign up for something that's meaningless. So to answer your question more directly. No, trans men shouldn't have to sign up for the draft (along with everyone else!) because it's a waste of time and resources. Signing up for a draft doesn't matter when your country spends almost a trillion dollars a year on the military. You could also make an argument that trans men don't have a body composition that's ideal for fighting and that they have mental health issues meaning that they are unfit to serve. There are plenty of trans service members though and all of them are braver than your stupid-question-asking ass.
 
14300969:Craw_Daddy said:
Yeah, we're required to sign up for something that's meaningless. So to answer your question more directly. No, trans men shouldn't have to sign up for the draft (along with everyone else!) because it's a waste of time and resources. Signing up for a draft doesn't matter when your country spends almost a trillion dollars a year on the military. You could also make an argument that trans men don't have a body composition that's ideal for fighting and that they have mental health issues meaning that they are unfit to serve. There are plenty of trans service members though and all of them are braver than your stupid-question-asking ass.
Click to expand...

the draft is not meaningless, we could easily go to war with china in the next couple of years. It is also extremely transphobic of you to claim that there is a difference between men and women and that trans people just have a mental health issue. Check your privilege bigot.
 
No because the draft is stupid and shouldn't exist. If the US has a shortage of soliders maybe they should find more noble wars to get involved in.
 
The draft is fucking dumb as shit. But, since we're stuck with it for the time being, OP's question is pointless. Either everyone, men, women, and anyone inbetween signs up, or nobody signs up.
 
14300973:steeze_louise said:
It is also extremely transphobic of you to claim that there is a difference between men and women
Click to expand...

This is not transphobic. This is reality. You're insane if you think it is transphobic, or even misogynistic, to make that claim.
 
Women should be required to sign up for the draft. I want to have mouth to mouth performed on me by a beautiful big booba female soldier as i slowly fade out due to radiation fallout on the battlefield in some 3rd world country ✊✊
 
FYI, selective service isn’t really called the draft anymore since the military moved away from that method. That said, yeah. If they’re male they need to be on it if they’re an American citizen.
 
14301126:safarisam said:
FYI, selective service isn’t really called the draft anymore since the military moved away from that method. That said, yeah. If they’re male they need to be on it if they’re an American citizen.
Click to expand...

FYI in the US, we commonly refer to military conscription as "getting drafted" and registering for selective service as "signing up for the draft"
 
14301130:Craw_Daddy said:
FYI in the US, we commonly refer to military conscription as "getting drafted" and registering for selective service as "signing up for the draft"
Click to expand...

I mean yeah, that term definitely still exists, since selective service would be in charge of a draft if we ever needed to do that. I’m dumb lol
 
They are never going to have another draft again after Vietnam... shit was antiquated then as it is now.

Any war the USA needs to put that many boots on the ground for would be a war that will eventually require some nuclear weapons. They were playing with fire back in the Cold War as it is... and the only nuclear nations that the USA truely sees as threats - Russia and China - are way way too self interested to want to escalate to a nuclear conflict now that they are run by capitalist oligarchs.
 
God forbid there’s another draft, they’d be drafting the generation known for eating tide pods and using words like “cheugy”.
 
14301168:Charlie_Kelly said:
God forbid there’s another draft, they’d be drafting the generation known for eating tide pods and using words like “cheugy”.
Click to expand...

Words heard in the upcoming war with China-

"POGGERS"

"CRACKED HIS ARMOR"

"I'm running Amax, Kar98, what's your loadout?"

"PUSHING"

"I'm gonna rotate left in zone"

"GUY SNIPING UP IN THE TREES AT 234°"
 
Idk how the feds would possibly be able to find you in war time if not for that stupid paper card ?
 
It's dumb that anyone has to sign up. As if we can't figure out who is 18 and male by SSN. Typical government idea to create a department of doing 1 thing poorly to join the countless others.
 
14301252:Dustin. said:
It's dumb that anyone has to sign up. As if we can't figure out who is 18 and male by SSN. Typical government idea to create a department of doing 1 thing poorly to join the countless others.
Click to expand...

Oh god cry about the government employing people more...
 
14301257:DingoSean said:
Oh god cry about the government employing people more...
Click to expand...

I work for the government, don't challenge me on this one. We spend too much money, it's amazing how hard I work to put money to good use instead of on absolute stupidity. The government can't just create jobs without taxing people more, that's a self-licking ice cream cone.
 
14301263:Dustin. said:
I work for the government, don't challenge me on this one. We spend too much money, it's amazing how hard I work to put money to good use instead of on absolute stupidity. The government can't just create jobs without taxing people more, that's a self-licking ice cream cone.
Click to expand...

Lol, the government spends a lot more on corporate welfare in order to retain jobs in the private sector.. And dont even get me started on the military industrial complex..

The selective service costs america 23 million dollars a year. Thats like what... 6, maybe 7 Naval Torpedos?

If we are going to talk about government waste, then hooo boy.
 
With women allowed in combat roles now I have to imagine this is gonna happen regardless in the near future requiring them to sign up. Otherwise it's discriminatory against males to an incredibly worse extent than title IX ever was.

If males don't sign up: "you are required to register and you don't, you will not be eligible for federal student aid, federal job training, or a federal job. You may be prosecuted and face a fine of up to $250,000 and/or jail time of up to five years."
 
Never say never....

But fr if there ever was another world War in our lifetimes that didn't end in nuclear holocaust, then you can certainly expect they're calling on selective service. The obvious enemies vastly outnumber our current military size.

14301156:DingoSean said:
They are never going to have another draft again after Vietnam... shit was antiquated then as it is now.

Any war the USA needs to put that many boots on the ground for would be a war that will eventually require some nuclear weapons. They were playing with fire back in the Cold War as it is... and the only nuclear nations that the USA truely sees as threats - Russia and China - are way way too self interested to want to escalate to a nuclear conflict now that they are run by capitalist oligarchs.
Click to expand...
 
14301292:HypeBeast said:
Never say never....

But fr if there ever was another world War in our lifetimes that didn't end in nuclear holocaust, then you can certainly expect they're calling on selective service. The obvious enemies vastly outnumber our current military size.
Click to expand...

The obvious enemies?

What country is enough of a downright enemy to us or our closest allies that also has enough power to where the American voters would support such a mobilization effort?

Look, it would be one thing if Mexico all of a sudden lost it's mind and started sending drugged out Catholic suicide bombers over the border... but the farfetchedness of one of our neighbours going bananas just doesn't make sense...

If China started attempting to invade Taiwan, for example... the amount of remote military hardware the USA has today already removes the need for a mass mobilization and training of troops in such an extreme event...

not to mention the fact that we got the bomb which is some serious deterrence.

The only way I could se selective services being used would be if we had a civil war... and even then it would likely play out without much standing army involvement as it would be guerrilla as fuck
 
There's clear distinctions of which countries are currently allies with each other so barring some conflict outside those places, if there were to be a war tomorrow you could pretty much bet China, Russia, NK, Iran, and Pakistan would all be allies with each other and we would certainly be the opposition. There's obviously more but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see who are friends and foe in the world today. Nato still exists which is one of the more lasting treaties or agreements out there right now. Use the worldwide search bar if you want to learn more about global relations between countries. The US helping other countries with aid isn't benevolence; it's strategic.

14301299:DingoSean said:
The obvious enemies?
Click to expand...
 
14301354:HypeBeast said:
There's clear distinctions of which countries are currently allies with each other so barring some conflict outside those places, if there were to be a war tomorrow you could pretty much bet China, Russia, NK, Iran, and Pakistan would all be allies with each other and we would certainly be the opposition. There's obviously more but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see who are friends and foe in the world today. Nato still exists which is one of the more lasting treaties or agreements out there right now. Use the worldwide search bar if you want to learn more about global relations between countries. The US helping other countries with aid isn't benevolence; it's strategic.
Click to expand...

What youre talking about are nuclear powers. There is no reason to institute a draft to start a conventional war against an enemy that will just ragequit and release their nuclear weapons. If anything, mobilizing will only lead to your enemies mobilization and therefore more weapons proliferation...

The USA is geographically advantaged as hell, and doesnt need to have a large standing army, much less a draft to feed it. It is surrounded by oceans, allies, and developing nations. On top of that, it has hemmed in all of asia with its allies in Europe, and in the Far East with Korea, Japan, Rep of China/Taiwan, the Philippines, and Australia/NZ forming a giant wall of allies hemming in Mainland Asia from the rest of the pacific.

You can literally walk across the border from Russia to China to India to Pakistan... Russia has Conscription, and China, India and Pakistan have large enough population pools that they have no issue reliably acquiring volunteers. They all have large standing armies and comparatively weak navies because of their geographic situations.

Iran is hemmed in by an embargo and American allies - specifically Saudi Arabia. the USA would only need to institute a draft if it intended on invading Iran - which it has no need to do, nor does it have the public support required to do it. North Korea has one friend, and that friend is only there because China wants to have a buffer zone between it and an American ally.

That is one of the reasons why America has such a large and powerful navy and such a comparatively small Army to other nations... America Britain and France basically can do whatever they want in the Pacific, Atlantic, and Indian oceans as well as in the Mediterranean. The Russians have a presence in the Arctic, but they are easily countered there. India and Pakistan are too focused on their own border to worry about serious navies, and China, while they have some naval potential, are disadvantaged by shallow waters - so their SSNs - the only real countermeasure against superior American surface vessels are easily detectable. Their focus right now is to create a bunch of islands so they can claim the south China Sea and control the trade through there.

To put it in game-terms: the way that America has their Risk Board set up, they can just keep collecting on North and South America along with Australia while nobody else controls a whole continent, and nobody has the dice luck to penetrate. America keeps just stacking 9 additional armies during every reinforcement and doesnt even need to place them in north america.

The only way the American population could possibly get on board with instituting a draft is if one of its neighbours became strong enough to pose a conventional military threat... or if some absolutely massive and threatening destabilization was going down in say, Europe. I just don't see that happening anytime soon
 
Russia is friends with no one, they may play along for a short while then poison you when the co op missions accomplished

14301354:HypeBeast said:
There's clear distinctions of which countries are currently allies with each other so barring some conflict outside those places, if there were to be a war tomorrow you could pretty much bet China, Russia, NK, Iran, and Pakistan would all be allies with each other and we would certainly be the opposition. There's obviously more but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see who are friends and foe in the world today. Nato still exists which is one of the more lasting treaties or agreements out there right now. Use the worldwide search bar if you want to learn more about global relations between countries. The US helping other countries with aid isn't benevolence; it's strategic.
Click to expand...

Only reason we want you in the military is bc important soldiers like me need a shield buddy

14301355:.frenchy said:
nah we dont want them in our military anyway
Click to expand...
 
14301282:DingoSean said:
Lol, the government spends a lot more on corporate welfare in order to retain jobs in the private sector.. And dont even get me started on the military industrial complex..

The selective service costs america 23 million dollars a year. Thats like what... 6, maybe 7 Naval Torpedos?

If we are going to talk about government waste, then hooo boy.
Click to expand...

Sounds like you’re cool with them wasting 23 million dollars.

Sure, the military budget is bloated, so is the entire budget in general.

Here was an interesting read:
https://posey.house.gov/wasteful-spending/
 
14301299:DingoSean said:
The obvious enemies?

What country is enough of a downright enemy to us or our closest allies that also has enough power to where the American voters would support such a mobilization effort?

Look, it would be one thing if Mexico all of a sudden lost it's mind and started sending drugged out Catholic suicide bombers over the border... but the farfetchedness of one of our neighbours going bananas just doesn't make sense...

If China started attempting to invade Taiwan, for example... the amount of remote military hardware the USA has today already removes the need for a mass mobilization and training of troops in such an extreme event...

not to mention the fact that we got the bomb which is some serious deterrence.

The only way I could se selective services being used would be if we had a civil war... and even then it would likely play out without much standing army involvement as it would be guerrilla as fuck
Click to expand...

Very, very wrong. But what do I know, this is literally my job.
 
14301362:little1337 said:
Shit takes and frenchy go together like peanut butter and jelly
Click to expand...

lol more like we don’t need to be wasting even more military spending on sex change surgeries. and it’s a distraction for everyone and effects unit readiness. but hey what do i know about the military!
 
14301440:.frenchy said:
lol more like we don’t need to be wasting even more military spending on sex change surgeries. and it’s a distraction for everyone and effects unit readiness. but hey what do i know about the military!
Click to expand...

Boot
 
14301174:JAHpow said:
Words heard in the upcoming war with China-

"POGGERS"

"CRACKED HIS ARMOR"

"I'm running Amax, Kar98, what's your loadout?"

"PUSHING"

"I'm gonna rotate left in zone"

"GUY SNIPING UP IN THE TREES AT 234°"
Click to expand...

After the COVID lockdown, I unfortunately know and have heard all but the first within the past month.

But this made me laugh.
 
Obviously not much which is why you’ll be on that frontline forever, but that’s ok, we need mindless meat shields

14301440:.frenchy said:
lol more like we don’t need to be wasting even more military spending on sex change surgeries. and it’s a distraction for everyone and effects unit readiness. but hey what do i know about the military!
Click to expand...
 
14301524:SavageBiff said:
Obviously not much which is why you’ll be on that frontline forever, but that’s ok, we need mindless meat shields
Click to expand...

let me guess you’ve been in the military for a year and think you’re some high speed little ranger? you just sound like an absolute idiot who keeps calling me a meat shield too…. couldn’t think of a better way to go than dying for my country sooo
 
?

Magtf baby ??

I could def think of better insults, got a few off top o me head but you are the epitome of a meat shield, your “die for my country” statement further supports it

14301550:.frenchy said:
let me guess you’ve been in the military for a year and think you’re some high speed little ranger? you just sound like an absolute idiot who keeps calling me a meat shield too…. couldn’t think of a better way to go than dying for my country sooo
Click to expand...
 
14300973:steeze_louise said:
the draft is not meaningless, we could easily go to war with china in the next couple of years. It is also extremely transphobic of you to claim that there is a difference between men and women and that trans people just have a mental health issue. Check your privilege bigot.
Click to expand...

If I think I have two personalities, its a mental health issue.

If I think there are imaginary people after me that dont exist, its a mental health issue.

If I think I am a different gender than my actual biology, its a mental health issue.

Saying trans people are suddenly a new gender and letting them play in sports and go into locker rooms is like letting someone with multiple personality disorder vote twice. We should
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top