Icelantic Danollies or Armada Thalls?

[TwinTipCities]

Hey I found some good deals on the 2011/2012 models of both skis, 170 for the Danollie and 171 for the Thall. I was wondering what every one's experience was with each. I understand they both have a good amount of flex to them which I'm looking for, since I skied the fuckin 10/11 suspects which were pretty stiff and had awful durability. I ski about 60% rails 40% jumps and I'm 5' 8" 135 lbs.

 

[TheWakes.]

i am 5'9" 140 and i ride a 176 t hall. 171 will be nice on rails but i worry it wouldnt be enough ski for you on a jump bigger than 20 ft. next years is stiff underfoot and gets softer at the very tip and tail. still a stiff ski overall tho.likes to go fast on hard snow.

havent skied the icelantics.

 

[.nasty]

thalls because they're not icelantics. lol

 

[TwinTipCities]

Well I'm from the midwest so we don't have the biggest jumps out hurr..thanks i'll keep that in mind

 

[.ZT.]

AR7 are also good, very similar to T-Halls for a cheaper price. If you are interested in more info pm me.

 

[ForeverYung]

They are stiffer though, he wants flexy

 

[.ZT.]

true but IMO they are pretty flexy after skiing on them for a season. Amazingly poppy and can flex enough for good butters also they hold up on any jump or rail with the stiffness and durability. Just saying he should check em out.

 

[booniemon]

Thalls

 

[mackcamp]

Icelantic, You wont be disappointed!

 

[camstain]

I'm with him I absolutely love my danollies.

 

[AnthonyWalsh]

def the thalls, love em to death

 

[FigNewton]

Icelantics are really light. I demoed a pair of 170's and i could do flat ground 3's easy and im 5'8" and 110 lbs