LittleJibber16
Active member
do you guys use skis that are above your head or below, and how much above or below?
pats peak is awesome
pats peak is awesome
how tall should skis be?
- Thread starter LittleJibber16
- Start date
Frostfired
Active member
well if ur buying em now get them definetly above ur head by a bit (like 2-4 inces) cuz itl last u longer
pretend you will give the guy head to give back your skis, he probably will accept, then once he whipps his cock out, steal it-SteezePatro
if you want to be a real gangster wear your ski boots to the dance. when he starts shit when youre face to face do a backflip and in your rotation kick him in the face with your boot. something in his face will break for sure. fights over.-seanPISTOL
or just walk away with his chick making him look like a complete jackass in front of a bunch of s
pretend you will give the guy head to give back your skis, he probably will accept, then once he whipps his cock out, steal it-SteezePatro
if you want to be a real gangster wear your ski boots to the dance. when he starts shit when youre face to face do a backflip and in your rotation kick him in the face with your boot. something in his face will break for sure. fights over.-seanPISTOL
or just walk away with his chick making him look like a complete jackass in front of a bunch of s
ski_Crystal
Member
a bit above your head
~-~NWFT~-~
*Kirsten*
~-~NWFT~-~
*Kirsten*
polishskier
Active member
always buy bigger skis short ones r worse
BioEnhanced
Member
It all depends on your hieght and weight. How tall are you and what do you weigh? It also depends on whether the ski youre looking at is stiff or flexy. THe more flex the ski has the longer you want to go.
SNWBDRHOON
Member
yup yup.
i don't ski anything shorter than 180 unless it is park only. then it's like a 170.
but it is personal preference, height, weight, where you ski, etc.
for example: if you lived in jackson hole, a short, skinny ski would SUCK. you would want seth pistols, motherships, etc. as your primary ski in a 180 plus... at least.
but if you were at mt snow, your primary ski would probably be in the 170 - 175 range and be like a chronic, PE or a 1080.
of course then there is my brother who lives in oregon. he rocks the 200 straight boards (Salomon GS skis) for all applications. and he does just fine. his 'short skis' are a pair of a Kent Kreitler 192's... from like 97... and those are his 'new' skis.
i don't ski anything shorter than 180 unless it is park only. then it's like a 170.
but it is personal preference, height, weight, where you ski, etc.
for example: if you lived in jackson hole, a short, skinny ski would SUCK. you would want seth pistols, motherships, etc. as your primary ski in a 180 plus... at least.
but if you were at mt snow, your primary ski would probably be in the 170 - 175 range and be like a chronic, PE or a 1080.
of course then there is my brother who lives in oregon. he rocks the 200 straight boards (Salomon GS skis) for all applications. and he does just fine. his 'short skis' are a pair of a Kent Kreitler 192's... from like 97... and those are his 'new' skis.