How is Line affected by Invader Problems

Triple_Strum

Triple_Strum

Active member
It seems lots of people are getting their Invaders warrentied by Line recently. I am wondering how production problems have hurt Line financially. I realize Line has been around long enough that this isn't a red-alert and they have many other excellent products. But, I can't help but wonder the problems this creates for a company. Can either someone who knows about Line or Liberty (since they had quality control issues last year) expound on this? Enlighten a curious fellow.
 
haha, you gave an answer to a question that wasn't even asked. Read the post then make sense, please :) I asked how they were affected and you said... well, what you said.
 
What im saying is that so what because they had one pair of really sucsessful skis. Kind of like with the reactors last year the chronics and motherships were such a big hit that they could afford to give bindings to those whose broke them
 
true story, although from what ive heard (all be it from this site so might be rubbish) Line are having problems? Is this correct?
 
If you hear something on this site, it's probably safer to assume the opposite is true than to believe it.
 
I've seen a ton of Invaders come back into shops with the edges ripping out of the top. And the whole clear sheet on the top of the ski is pealing back (doesn't do anything to the performance of the sk though...I don't think). Couple kids at a local mountain got their Invaders and had the edge in the nose popping out after a few days riding them, not even beating them that hard. It's a shame because the idea behind the ski was such a great idea.
 
i was wondering the same thing because just about everyone at my mountain that has them they delaminate on one the tip or the tail of the ski. its too bad cause thats a sick ski for the money
 
exactly they are a great ski for the 289 and mabye had a few problems but was mostly users falt because they are a park spesific ski only
 
maybe in pure produciton cost, but you have to consider overhead and all the other costs (R&D, ads, etc)

we should not start seeing posts like "WHAT?!? we r geting ripped off!! it only cost them 90$?!?!?!?? what fukkerzz!!"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top