How Baggy are Oakley "Baggy Fit" Larges? + Karma for help

Bugler

Member
Yeah, im thinking of buying a pair of oakley over-the-top pants in Large "Baggy" fit. And i want to know, just how "baggy" are these. I really want a big, baggy pair of pants, and i dont want to end up dropping all this money on these pants, and have them be just "kinda" baggy.

I am 150 5'10. I currently have a pair of Large "Ride" pants, so if you have owned a pair from that company, and from oakley, then maybe you can compare them for me

Any help is appreciated. Thanks
 
OTTs are an even bigger fit than normal large oakley 'baggy' fit - they will be plenty big on you..

Im about 5'11 160 and i have some large Oakley pants which are the baggy fit and they are plenty big..the OTTs will be pretty massive
 
I wore a set of xl over the top pants last year. I am 5'10" and have a 34" waist. They were the perfect size for me however I couldn't fit my astrisk knee brace under them. I could fit it under my helly survival pant in the same size. They were about twice as baggy as my oakleys. Hope that helps. I can measure the actual diameter of the ankle and knee when i get home from work.
 
im 6'2" with a 34 waist and have a pair of baggy fit pants in xxl. they are big but not all that long. maybe step up a size
 
I would go with a the size Xl they were plenty baggy for me. IF you are looking for huge Im not sure what to tell you other than these pants are pretty damn big.
 
i am like 6' and i wore a "baggy L" last year and it was a nice baggy fit so for you being a little shorter i think the L "baggy" fit would be perfect.
 
I doubt this photo will help you but it's the only one i could find

I'm 5'10 or so, and about 160lb..

I'm on the left and the pants aren't sagged at all.

As i've said though - the OTTs fit bigger than other Oakley 'Baggy Fit' pants

n585470119_1616769_1711.jpg
 
baggy fit XL, i'm 5'6.

i'd get a bigger size if you were trying to have legit real baggy pants.

1219456509IMG_0275.JPG
 
Back
Top