how are the mike nicks?

they're a long skiboard, and skiboards suck...so you do the math

This post was brought to you by me, Jeff Meeker.

____________________________________________________________

Dave Likes Kittens.

Undercover skier, and nuclear technician of the Silent Army!

::Viva La Ressistance::
 
very good ski..it has to be! it's used by one of the top 5 best freeskiers in the world!

********************

Sometimes it just takes lots of practice and the will to beat your face in, get back up, and do it again is what it's all about.....

********************
 
they are not skiboards, dumbass. i'm not even going to waste my time by arguing that point more. they are a nice ski, a short one, but very manuverable, nice carving (for a full twin) not good in the pow, nice switch, and ok graphics. but i ended up painting over mine anyways.

late

Just Huck It.
 
WORST ski I have ever been on, two runs was more than enough for me, theyr probably pretty deicent in the park though.

 
i have them. i dont see why people are saying all this bad shit about them... i guess they just cant stand the fact that mike nick used to ski blade. its not a bad ski, not flimsy and gives good pop, great for rails nice tail and great for switch riding. People should have more respect for that man, he ski bladed on some of the first ever made and way before twip tips even came out,later he found that he could go bigger with twins so made the switch. he invented many sweet tricks like rodeos, flatspins with lui kangs n shit. he was hittin up the park when they were snowboard only and had to take shit from the resorts and the snowboarders.

 
gahd dammit, i hear that. it brings a gad damn tear to me eye.

Make a man a fire, he will be warm for a while. Set a man on fire, he will be warm for the rest of his life.
 
From what I saw from the Line website (hard goods), the Nick Mike are exactly the same as the Skogen Sprang, but in 171 centimeters..

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top