How are Elizabeth's outside the park?

R

rastaride

Member
obviously they are fat which would be a plus in crud and pow, but how do they turn and does the flex affect powder skiing? just for future reference

 
I've never ridden them, but since they're a 110 waist, they can't suck at powder.

----------------------------------------

Do you have UNCONTROLABLE URGES TO SPIN OFF THINGS... WHILE WEARING SHOES? Join the UUTSOTWWS cult!

"I like driving switch, I'm also getting better at turning unnatural"- talking about cars

 
r u seriously that fucking dumb, elizabeths are not made for park, hence your question should be "how are Elizabeths in the park" but would u really take a 110 width ski in the park? probably not, you are a shithead

what's up now bitch

"the fatter you are the smaller you go"-unknown

ACLs suck
 
^dont be such a jackass to this kid... he was asking a legit question. people keep raving about the park abilities of this ski, so it would be logical to ask for the other half of the equation. i would think they would be good for pow from the waist size, but they are fairly short, so i dont know. i think they would be good, but not as good as a comprable width ski that was longer... but i havent ridden them, so whatever that means.

'If she floats than she is not

A witch like we had thought'

'Like most babies smell like butter

his smell smelled like no other'

'She'll come back as fire, to burn all the liars,

And leave a blanket of ash on the ground.
 
They're MADE for the park, so his question is right.

----------------------------------------

Do you have UNCONTROLABLE URGES TO SPIN OFF THINGS... WHILE WEARING SHOES? Join the UUTSOTWWS cult!

"I like driving switch, I'm also getting better at turning unnatural"- talking about cars

 
pussy footer your fucking dumb, they are a park ski. dont be such a cranky bitch. ive skied them in pow and aroudn the mountain and i thought they were awesome. im 5'6' so they were a good size on me. of course pollard is quite a bit taller, adn they are his skis, so they work good for taller people, the geometry allows for a shorter ski. the flex isnt weird so it doesnt hurt its performance carving/skiing pow. they are quite nimble skis. really good everywhere ski. literally

-------------------------------------

The
re's business Schmuck

and there's rockstar Schmuck'

'the graphics should be completely flat black on his pro model... that would be intense.' -Jc_Dunn

LORD OF THE PARK 2006.....
 
thats fucking ridiculous! 110 park ski?? why?? and i didnt no this so sorry if i was a jackass, it would just seem a 110 would be a powder ski obviously

what's up now bitch

"the fatter you are the smaller you go"-unknown

ACLs suck
 
yeah, pollard skis the elizabeth in the park - he skis the 150 (underfoot) ski in the pow!! WTF!

the elizabeth is sick, i skied it all last year and love it more than any other ski i have ever skied.

 
I can't speak for everyone, but I bought my first pair of fatties (mo'ships - 97 @ waist) for powder. I truly did not think they would ever see a groomed run.

Long story short, it has become my all-mtn ski, and has made me better in the park, and I will probably never own anything thinner.

Thank you - drive through

| |
| : |
| ; |
/ Y \
( ( )
\ _\ _ /
 
i have them too and they're just incredible. i'm only 5'3" so i actually got them as my BC ski cuz they're like miniature sized prophets compared to me. long story short, they kill it everywhere. after i got them i didn't even ride my park skis anymore, because the liza's were so much better in the park. and they slay crud and pow like no one's business. i don't know how they'd be on a taller person, but my guess is they'd be ok. they're perfect for me.

my level of radness... it just can't... be quantified.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top