skier24 Active member Mar 14, 2007 #1 http://www.freeride.eu/review/view.php?id=3638 holy fuck....these are fricken huge!
chickenwang Active member Mar 14, 2007 #2 at first i was like gay another short ass icelantic ski but then i saw the 186 and was a lil more interested
at first i was like gay another short ass icelantic ski but then i saw the 186 and was a lil more interested
seider Member Mar 14, 2007 #4 when i first saw them i thought they were snowblades, but wow those are some obeas skis
skier24 Active member Mar 14, 2007 #7 yea it may be but there really isnt a good picture or info site with the size and dimensions does anyone think that these are pushing it? do you really need that wide of skis? i mean 170 in the waist? thats is just a little to crazy...
yea it may be but there really isnt a good picture or info site with the size and dimensions does anyone think that these are pushing it? do you really need that wide of skis? i mean 170 in the waist? thats is just a little to crazy...
Love_Wins. Active member Mar 15, 2007 #9 Interestig, look like they changed the dimensions if that page is right, they were brought up by Scott in this thread: https://newschoolers.com/web/forums/readthread/thread_id/277963/ And the dimensions were 203/177/193
Interestig, look like they changed the dimensions if that page is right, they were brought up by Scott in this thread: https://newschoolers.com/web/forums/readthread/thread_id/277963/ And the dimensions were 203/177/193
Sharko Active member Mar 15, 2007 #10 nope, it's a typo. They switched the tip and tail measurements. Also, it is just one of their monoskis but with the camber removed and sold in pairs.
nope, it's a typo. They switched the tip and tail measurements. Also, it is just one of their monoskis but with the camber removed and sold in pairs.