I can't believe you guys think that run lacked technical difficulty....what the fuck are you guys talking about?
first of all, the only feature he wasn't straight up next level on was the second rail.
As far as this sw 9 not cutting it.....well, it was a rightside sw 9, the axis was fucked and it wasn't "just a safety grab", it was the newly debated method/lobster/tweaked safety that is a hell of a lot more difficult and unique then simply sucking knees up and grabbing under the boot. For a comparison, it's not like he was doing a whiskey flip boot grab because that's all he could manage like some guys do, that shit was the definition of purposeful.
The tap on the third jib was fucking money and took more control than hucking a misty 4 or six out like most of the comp guys do.
The second jump was pretty much a brand new rotation. Never seen that trick in a comp, and other than Harlaut and Vinnie G, I don't think there's anyone else that could've pulled off a belly down, head down the hill "dub rodeo"....that rotation doesn't even have a fucking name. That was by far the most impressive jump trick thrown all day, by any standard. Calling it a dub rodeo 10, as if it was the trick John Spriggs, Jon and Jacob were doing in fucking 07 is a joke.
The reason Henrik didn't score better is simple, he came off the rail early on the nose butter 4 disaster, and landed squirrely on the rt sw 9, and it sort of looked like he meant to do something else on the second rail. Plainly stated, his execution wasn't quite flawless enough...had it been, he easily would've cracked 90.
 I think he was scored fairly personally, so I agree in that respect, but you guys shitting on his tech diff are high. That rt sw 9 with the axis and the grab is arguably a MORE tech trick than a dub cork 10 mute. The funny thing is, more rotation doesn't always automatically mean a harder trick. For example, when the sw 10 phenom was popping off, I heard several guys claim sw 9 is actually more difficult.