Has on3p lost all hype

14528515:J_Steez said:
k2 reckoner 112s are msrp 750$. since when is that price point? they are also top tier durability...
Click to expand...

If you're not buying big brand skis in the spring/summer when they're 50% off, you're doing it wrong.
 
14528697:ASSholebomber22 said:
If you're not buying big brand skis in the spring/summer when they're 50% off, you're doing it wrong.
Click to expand...

I did that exact thing. Doesn't change the fact that K2 skis are not entry level price point skis lmao
 
14528735:J_Steez said:
I did that exact thing. Doesn't change the fact that K2 skis are not entry level price point skis lmao
Click to expand...

Fair I suppose. But the odds of copping a $400 new pair of k2's is significantly higher than a new pair of indie brand skis I guess is my point
 
14528465:eheath said:
the point is that you shouldn't be worried about durability when you're skiing park, your skis will break down you're using them in a way that skis are not suppose to be used.

its like saying one skateboard is more durable than another, they're all a plank of wood being slammed into concrete and metal.
Click to expand...

Skis aren't skateboards. There is a variety of edge profiles, associated base thicknesses, base materials, sidewall materials, binding pullout reinforcement methods, core materials, composite materials, and lamination methods in use that all effect the durability. And at least some manufacturers make special considerations for park skis to try to help them last longer on rails
 
topic:Lucky_julian said:
Ok I get it there good quality, made in the USA blah blah blah, and don’t get me wrong Jake mageau and Oscar weary are sick but where’s the pro model park ski to carry this company. After Magnus pro model left it’s never been the same company. Don’t even get me started on Meeks. Not even hating just genuinely pissed one of my favourite ski company’s take a couple steps backwards in their growth.
Click to expand...

People buy on3p because they’re nice skis not because they’re overhyped like vishnus
 
14528740:ASSholebomber22 said:
Fair I suppose. But the odds of copping a $400 new pair of k2's is significantly higher than a new pair of indie brand skis I guess is my point
Click to expand...

that wasnt the argument for the other person, they were speaking on how k2s were cheap and not durable
 
topic:Lucky_julian said:
Ok I get it there good quality, made in the USA blah blah blah, and don’t get me wrong Jake mageau and Oscar weary are sick but where’s the pro model park ski to carry this company. After Magnus pro model left it’s never been the same company. Don’t even get me started on Meeks. Not even hating just genuinely pissed one of my favourite ski company’s take a couple steps backwards in their growth.
Click to expand...

Sounds like you just need a skiers dick to ride on. Lol fan boy

14528455:AlmostCooler said:
One data point means nothing. A collection of data points starts to become a significant trend.
Click to expand...

No.. No it doesn't. In fact a collection of data points means nothing either until you analyze it properly. Additionally how that data is collected and if confounding variables are not considered, also impacts the significance and validity of your results.

Ever heard the phrase "correlation does not imply causation"? Or did you sleep through the first day of intro to stats? Unless you're doing statistical analysis you can't prove causation and ffs eyeballing a trend doesn't make it significant lol.
 
I’m probably more stoked on on3p right now and want to buy their skis more than anytime during the magnus era
 
On3p is totally PLAYED bro, the park is flooded with 1000 skis, there is nobody good who skis for On3p anymore, they don’t release good street content like 1000 skis does, jetskis are also wayyy more durable than on3p they still work after the E falls out. Absolutely no reason to support on3p anymore THE HYPE IS GONE!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top