Mar-O Member Jul 5, 2012 #2 Threads cause I am wondering the same thing. I think the HD is much easier to balance but I am not sure.
Threads cause I am wondering the same thing. I think the HD is much easier to balance but I am not sure.
B BA.berger Member Jul 5, 2012 #3 ^Thats right, the hd2000 is much easier to balance.. if you have the money for a HD model, I think you should go for it..https://vimeo.com/15300979 This one will show some of the difference
^Thats right, the hd2000 is much easier to balance.. if you have the money for a HD model, I think you should go for it..https://vimeo.com/15300979 This one will show some of the difference
FatWhore Active member Jul 5, 2012 #4 hmm, interesting. But still I'd rather save the couple hundred for that.
? [~_~] Active member Jul 5, 2012 #5 In my opinion the HD is absolutely worth the price difference. The Pro is just a flawed design.
FatWhore Active member Jul 5, 2012 #6 which explains why the HD series is basically a remake of the Pro series.
Mar-O Member Jul 5, 2012 #8 does anyone know how much more time it takes to balance the XR 2000 vs the HD 2000??
sweatshirt Active member Jul 6, 2012 #10 bitch in that video said, as soon as you add an nd filter your 4 pound camera will go over the 6 pound limit.. allofmywat.png
bitch in that video said, as soon as you add an nd filter your 4 pound camera will go over the 6 pound limit.. allofmywat.png