Genetic variations effects on athleticism in homo sapien

Yauch

Active member
yeah so a very informative thread just got deleted and in summary this one of the things that went down.

Quinny said this to me-

"You would be criticized if you said that "African Americans" have had

success in track and field because they are "African Americans". Race

has nothing to do with it, physique does. If you can't make that

distinction, you need to do everyone a favor and shut the fuck up and

not pretend like you know anything about "race". I as well as pretty much every other

person in this thread can see though your thinly disguised

incompetence. Now run along and play in traffic you brainless limp dick

adolescent."

he also repeated himself and said

"that skin color has no correlation to athleticism. If it did,

sports worldwide would be dominated by a specific race. They are not.

It has more to do with demographics than anything...the environment the

person grew up with, the kind of education they received, and the kind

of resources that they had available. For every black "super athlete"

you could count, there would be far more that would not "make the cut."

You could make a case for cultural breeding, but that has little or

nothing to do with race. Look at it on the basic level of DNA. A gene

the dictates skin color has no influence whatsoever structural build of

the body. That is why you are wrong.

You can post all the YouTube links you want, and you can cough up

all the uncreative insults you like, but you cant give my a shred of

scientific proof that any of your hypotheses are correct."

I replied with this scientific paper which explains something that nobody on this website seems to understand that there are real physical differences between different races of people.

aaas_logo_01.gif


July 30, 2004

Peering Under the Hood of Africa's Runners

By Constance Holden

Kenyans

dominate endurance running, and West Africans excel as sprinters. With

a physiological explanation in hand, researchers are now probing the

genetics of this geographic mastery In 1968, a Kenyan runner named Kip

Keino emerged as a shining star of the Mexico City summer Olympics,

setting a world record in the 1500-meter race. Year after year Keino's

success has been followed by equally dazzling feats by his compatriots:

Kenyan men now hold world records in the 3000-meter track race, the

15-, 20-, and 25-kilometer road races, the half-marathon, and the

marathon. Kenyan men have won 13 of the last 14 Boston marathons.

Kenyan women are also rising fast: They hold half of the top 10

marathon times and world records in 20-, 25-, and 30-km track races.

What is even more remarkable is that most of these athletes come from a

small area in Kenya's Rift Valley, from a group of tribes called the

Kalenjin who number little more than 3 million people.



Theories abound about what Kenya-born writer and runner John Manners

calls "the greatest geographical concentration of achievement in the

annals of sport." Is it the high altitude that fosters big lungs and

efficient oxygen use? Is it their maize-based diet? Or the fact that

many children run to school? A grueling training regimen, perhaps? Such

questions have inspired a handful of researchers to try to define the

Kenyan magic. Meanwhile, scientists are unraveling why athletes whose

ancestors come from the other side of the continent&West

Africa—have emerged as the world's fastest sprinters.

Fuel economy



Leading the charge in penetrating the Kenyan mystique has been Bengt

Saltin, a Swedish physiologist who heads the Copenhagen Muscle Research

Centre in Denmark. In the 1990s, Saltin's group began comparing Kenyan

and Scandinavian runners by scrutinizing their physiological makeups

and assessing the "trainability" of novice runners in both countries.

A

decade later, the scientists have ruled out most of the popular

explanations for Kenyans' domination of running. Altitude is not the

key to the riddle, they have found, because there's no difference

between Kenyans and Scandinavians in their capacity to consume oxygen.

And the Kenyan diet is on the low side for essential amino acids and

some vitamins as well as fat, says Dirk Christensen of the Copenhagen

center: "In spite of the diet, they perform at high level." The

running-to-school hypothesis was demolished as well: Kenyan children

aren't any more physically active than their Danish peers. Do Kenyans

try harder? The researchers found that the Danes actually pushed

themselves harder on a treadmill test, reaching higher maximum heart

rates.

An important clue is the

ability of Kenyans to resist fatigue longer. Lactate, generated by

tired, oxygen- deprived muscles, accumulates more slowly in their

blood. Comparisons of lactate levels have suggested to Saltin's group

that Kenyan runners squeeze about 10% more mileage from the same oxygen

intake than Europeans can.

Just as

more aerodynamic cars get better gas mileage, the Kenyan build helps

explain their fuel efficiency. A recent British TV documentary

described the Kalenjin as possessing "birdlike legs, very long levers

that are very, very thin [on which they] bounce and skip" along.

Saltin's

group has quantified this observation. Compared with Danes, the thinner

calves of Kenyans have, on average, 400 grams less flesh in each lower

leg. The farther a weight is from the center of gravity, the more

energy it takes to move it. Fifty grams added to the ankle will

increase oxygen consumption by 1%, Saltin's team calculates. For the

Kenyans, that translates into an 8% energy savings to run a kilometer.

"We have solved the main problem," declares Henrik Larsen of the

Copenhagen center. "Kenyans are more efficient because it takes less

energy to swing their limbs." Other scientists say the jury is still

out on the Kenyan question. But "I think Saltin is probably the most

correct that anyone is at the moment," says physiologist Kathryn

Myburgh of the University of Stellenbosch in South Africa, who is

exploring the role of Kenyans' training.

However,

slim lower legs are not the whole story. Kenyan runners also have a

higher concentration of an enzyme in skeletal muscle that spurs high

lactate turnover and low lactate production. Saltin says that this

results in an "extraordinarily high" capacity for fatty acid oxidation,

which helps wring more energy out of the muscles' biochemical

reactions. Because intense training alters the body's biochemistry,

Saltin says that he can't say for sure whether the ezyme levels are due

to genes or training. But he adds, "I think it's genetic." Research in

South Africa jibes with the Copenhagen group's findings.

A

team led by exercise physiologist Adele Weston of the University of

Sydney, Australia, compared black South Africans, whose running

strengths are similar to those of Kenyans, with white runners. The two

groups had similar VO2 max values—that is, when putting out maximum

effort, they used up the same amount of oxygen per kilogram of body

weight per minute. But the black runners were more efficient in their

oxygen consumption, lasting on a treadmill at maximum speed for twice

as long as the whites. As with the Kenyans, the black South African

runners accumulated less lactate and had higher levels of key muscle

enzymes.

A little more twitchy

Whereas

East Africans dominate long-distance running, West Africans have surged

to the fore in short-distance events. Little research has been done on

West Africans, but there's powerful circumstantial evidence for some

physical advantages, as presented by Jon Entine in his book "Taboo: Why Black Athletes Dominate Sports and Why We're Afraid to Talk About It."

Athletes of primarily West African descent—which includes the majority

of U.S. blacks—hold all but six of the 500 best times in the 100-meter

race, "the purest measure of running speed," says Entine, whose book

set off a broad debate on the subject.

Various

studies have shown that West African athletes have denser bones, less

body fat, narrower hips, thicker thighs, longer legs, and lighter

calves than whites. But the differences between East and West Africans

are even more striking. The fabled Kenyan runners are small, thin, and

tend to weigh between 50 and 60 kilograms, whereas West African

athletes are taller and a good 30 kilograms heavier, says Timothy

Noakes, a prominent exercise physiologist and researcher at the

University of Cape Town.

The

differences don't stop with body shape; there is also evidence of a

difference in the types of muscle fibers that predominate. Scientists

have divided skeletal muscles into two basic groups depending on their

contractile speed: type I, or slow-twitch muscles, and type II,

fast-twitch muscles. There are two kinds of the latter: type IIa,

intermediate between fast and slow; and type IIb, which are

superfast-twitch. Endurance runners tend to have mostly type I fibers,

which have denser capillary networks and are packed with more

mitochondria. Sprinters, on the other hand, have mostly type II fibers,

which hold lots of sugar as well as enzymes that burn fuel in the

absence of oxygen. In the 1980s, Claude Bouchard's team at Quebec's

Laval University took needle biopsies from the thigh muscles of white

French Canadian and black West African students. They found that the

Africans averaged significantly more fast-twitch muscle

fibers—67.5%—than the French Canadians, who averaged 59%.



Endurance runners have up to 90% or more slow-twitch fibers, Saltin

reports. Bouchard, now at Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge,

says his team looked at two enzymes that are markers for oxidative

metabolism and found higher activity of both in the West Africans,

meaning they could generate more ATP, the energy currency of the cell,

in the absence of oxygen. The study suggests that in West Africa there

may be a larger pool of people "with elevated levels of what it takes

to perform anaerobically at very high power output," says Bouchard.

Although

training can transform superfast-twitch type IIb fibers into the hybrid

type IIa, it is unlikely to cause slow- and fast-twitch fibers to

exchange identities. Myburgh says there is evidence that, with

extremely intensive long-distance training, fast IIa fibers can change

to slow type I fibers. So far, however, there is no evidence that

slow-twitch fibers can be turned into fast-twitch ones. As an athlete

puts on muscle mass through training, new fibers are not created, but

existing fibers become bigger.

Running ACEs

The

differences in physique and muscle makeup that underlie the dominance

of Kenyan endurance runners and West African sprinters doubtless have a

strong genetic component. But researchers are only just getting off the

starting mark in the search for genes that influence running

performance. Bouchard's group, for example, is collecting DNA samples

from 400 runners and other top endurance athletes from the United

States and Europe, but he says they haven't spotted any running genes

yet. There are a couple of intriguing possibilities, though. In 1999, a

team headed by Kathryn North of the Children's Hospital at Westmead in

Australia described two versions of a gene that affects production of

-actinin-3, a protein found only in fast-twitch muscles. They found the

less efficient version of the gene which results in poorer energy

conversion—in 18% of the members of a group of Caucasians.



In 2003, North's group reported in the—American Journal of Human

Genetics that only 6% of a group of sprinters had the gene defect; 26%

of endurance runners had it. The authors surmise that -actinin-3 helps

muscles generate "forceful contractions at high velocity."

Alejandro

Lucia Mulas of the European University in Madrid is taking DNA samples

from Eritrean runners to explore another candidate: different versions

of the gene for angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE). Lucia says the

less active version, or I allele, of this gene is associated with less

muscle, less fluid retention, and more relaxed blood vessels—which

would enhance oxygen uptake—and appears to be more prevalent in

endurance runners.

And in Scotland,

sports physiologist Yannis Pitsiladis has launched a major onslaught on

the Kenyans' secrets with the International Centre for East African

Running Science. Headquartered at the University of Glasgow, the

virtual center will bring together research on demography, diet, and

socioeconomic factors as well as genes. Pitsiladis says he has spent

the last 3 years in East Africa collecting DNA samples from their

"living legends" and now has DNA from 404 Kenyan and 113 Ethiopian

athletes. His team has found a higher prevalence of the I allele for

the ACE enzyme in male marathoners compared with men from the general

Ethiopian population. But Pitsiladis thinks his numbers may lack

significance given the variability of the trait in African populations.

"At the moment there is no evidence" that East Africans have a genetic

advantage in running, he says.

None of

the data negate the importance of cultural habits and training. But as

Entine quotes anthropologist and sports science expert Robert Malina,

who is retired from Michigan State University, "Differences among

athletes of elite caliber are so small that if you have an advantage

that might be genetically based ... it might be very, very

significant." Next month's Olympic games in Athens should demonstrate

yet again that West African runners are built for speed and Kenyans

built to endure.

 
please, i think it would be a real disservice to not let people know about this realm of science so please leave this thread alone unless you want people to stay ignorant forever
 
yeah imo there is a huge misconception going on here that skin color is a random genetic trait that is not linked with anything else in the human genome

the line from the article "Various

studies have shown that West African athletes have denser bones, less

body fat, narrower hips, thicker thighs, longer legs, and lighter

calves than whites" does a good job at disproving this.
 
it's absolutely true that being black does not just mean darker skin. it all depends on descent and the environment your bloodline comes from. depending on where people are from, different traits will prove more advantageous and natural selection kicks in. why are black people black? because their ancestors were from very sunny areas where more melanin was needed to protect their skin. why are scandinavians not black? because it is not nearly as sunny up there and paler skin works well. in the same way, blacks must have had some sort of selection pressures in africa that caused the faster and stronger individuals to live to reproduce and pass on those traits. it's not racism, it's evolution.
 
yeah i agree. Its incredible how ignorant some people are these days, especially in a country that prides itself on education.
 
Dude, nobody cares about your tiff with Quinny, just fucking drop it already, we dont need to see your bickering.
 
...not to mention the the creepo actually copied all of my posts. He's my first e-stalker. Well...cept snwbrdmilf, Haha.
 
clever bastard, try to get me to react so they delete this one too.. sorry quinny we're friends again so chill
 
the african safari of course. africans had to hunt prey for food and run away from predators on a daily basis which meant, running your ass off everyday. meanwhile europeans did hunt for food, but there were not as many predators to run away from, plus europe modernized much quicker
 
It would be funny as shit to turn this thread into a "I HEART SNWBRDMILF!!" thread, especially with its current title. Quite fitting.
 
Whatever dude, you're the reason the thread got deleted. I have no influence over what the mods do. And I'm not going to be friends with someone that went friggin AWOL, started cussing me out, hating on my life, and filling PM box with spam. Get a freaking life.
 
I have no idea what's going on with your little feud, but I do agree with the article posted. It's quite obvious race comes into play in sports. Hasn't anyone noticed how much easier it is for black dudes to get fuckin ripped? I'm trying to look from both sides and I'm not excluding the possibility that the article is of no merit, but Quinny you do seem like the type of person who just does not admit they may have made a mistake and will just start attacking the other person personally. I do agree with alot of what you say in threads though but that's just my personal opinion.
 
Haha, no I wasn't meaning that in a harsh way like some above me have said, I seriously do really like Ashley, shes fucking tight. All I'm saying is she gets personal with all the members, in a really cool way yadadadamean?
 
My video proves you wrong! IT SAY I CAN RUN FASTER THAN KENYANS DAMNIT! KENNNNYAAANNNNSSS!
 
i'm putting it out there that i find Quinny to be extremely obnoxious. I don't care what the topic is, but whenever Quinny pipes in with his often-true but always-condescending input, I naturally tend to side against him regardless of the actual subject at hand, just because everything he posts reminds me of those really annoying girls in history class who spew opinionated bullshit, refuse to listen to counter-arguments, and just don't shut up no matter how useless their point is.
 
Yeah, it's called slavery. It is a fact that slaves were bred to be stronger physical specimens. The weaker ones were weeded out through evolution. There is a reason why most African Americans are super athletic, but not necessarily most Africans. The ones who are in this country now are bigger and stronger as a result of the conscious decisions on the part of slave owners to pair up the top slaves in order to get slaves that were ideal for manual labor.
 
Opinion noted. But in general I find that people seem to only remember my posts when I get riled up rather than the ones when I'm low key. I also don't post regularly in NSG and when I do its in feverish outbursts. Go figure.
 


I do believe that some gene's do play a part in people's athleticism, as well as environmental factors. Some athletes will have larger heart muscles than others. Others will have a ridiculous VO2 max. Why do you think so many eastern europeans are so strong (i.e. weight lifters)? They're bred that way. They often have mutations in the level of myostatin. It's genetic and environmental.

However, the argument that race doesn't play a part because the gene that dictates a person's skin colour has nothing to do with athleticism is dumb. Of course it has nothing to do with the athleticism... but other genes do. It may be that a genetic mutation allowing for bigger muscle growth and better fitness was carried throughout the African people in the past, where fitness was required to survive. Those with the mutation could have lived, and those without may have died... leaving the Africans with stronger people. A good example of this 'natural selection' is cystic fibrosis. A theory of why so many europeans carry the disease is because the genetic mutation which caused it may also have a resistance against another disease... which may have wiped out those without resistance. Make sense?

While I have no scientific evidence that black people are stronger, it should be pretty clear that athleticism is the effect of both environmental (i.e. how you were brought up) and genetic factors.
 
There is an equal amount of genetic variation between two white people or two black people as there is between a white and a black person.
 
true, but it is in different areas. the two white people have more in common based on their ancestry compared to a white person and a black person.
 


Care to elaborate on that? I was told in biology that all human people who aren't black (i.e. asian, white, whatever else there is... red?) are mutations of black people. If true, your statement would make sense.
 
this is true, the origin of human species is believed to be from the depths of africa, and from there humans migrated all over the world, and eventually adapting to their new environments abroad, and losing some of the traits that were necessary to survive in africa.
 
Why the hell do so many people refuse to recognize that there are real differences between different races.?

Being a member of a certain race has a hell of alot more to it genetically than just a few genes dictating skin color.
 
naw i was lucky. I had 2 windows open of the same thread when it got deleted. So after they deleted it I still had a page left up with some of youre expertise on race. I have this post saved now incase you want to beg the mods to delete this one too. but whatever its over, peace
 
there are physical differences but mentally all races have just as much potential. look up some papers by, i believe his name is Dr. Sheik Diop? I believe thats the man who has done extensive research into this field
 
Sorry, as soothing as it is to believe that, it's BS

the brain is a physical organ, and is affected by genes just the same

------------------------------------

Race differences in average IQ are largely genetic

http://www.news-medical.net/?id=9530

------------------------------------

Further evidence for the existence of race and sex differences in cranial capacity.

"Cranial capacities were calculated from the external head measurements reported for 36 samples of 7 to 15 year olds gathered by the Philadelphia Growth Center (Krogman, 1970). The core sample consisted of 169 white males, 224 black males, 135 white females, and 220 black females. After adjusting for the effects of age, stature and sex, white children averaged 1250 cm3 and black children averaged 1236 cm3. After adjusting for the effects of age, stature and race, boys averaged 1300 cm3 and girls averaged 1186 cm3."

(White Men's brains are statistically larger than those of blacks and females.)

http://www.atypon-link.com/SJP/doi/abs/10.2224/sbp.1993.21.2.89?cookieSet=1&journalCode=sbp

-------------------------------------

THIRTY YEARS OF RESEARCH ON RACE


DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE ABILITY

"Some have suggested that we cannot expect members of ethnic groups to simply accept the genetic component in the mean-group differences in IQ and other traits. Yet, with regard to individuals within families, we do acknowledge that some siblings are more intelligent, more athletic, more physically attractive, or more socially charming than others. We also accept that some families are genetically more gifted in certain areas than other families. We should, therefore, by extension, be able to generalize to all the members of the human family. If viewed against the backdrop that group differences are simply aggregated individual differences, the former may be easier to accept than has hitherto been thought."

http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf
 
Just in case anyone missed it:

White males are genetically advantaged in mental ability over blacks and females

(and asians have us all beat)

"By adulthood, East Asians average 1 cubic inch more cranial capacity than Whites who average 5 cubic inches more than Blacks."

"Around the world, the average IQ for East Asians centers around 106; for Whites, about 100; and for Blacks about 85 in the U.S. and 70 in sub-Saharan Africa."

http://www.innovations-report.de/html/berichte/studien/bericht-43536.html
 
Back
Top