Future spinning is really spinning into the past, not future.

TaranItUp

TaranItUp

Active member
The Theory of Relativity states, that objects will move slower and shorten in length from the point of view of an observer on Earth. For example, So, if someone is moving at 99% of the speed of light and shines a light in front of them, one would think it would only go 1% faster, and for a stationary observer (whatever that really means) it would look that way. However, from the point of view of the person moving, it looks to them as if the light is moving away at 100% of the speed of light. How can that be? Well, suppose that the fast moving person is moving into the future at a faster rate than the stationary observer, who is aging faster. Because they are moving into the future 100 times faster, light appears to be moving 100 times faster than it really is. Thus the distortion of time causes the laws of physics to be the same in any frame of reference and all observers agree on the speed of light, but do not agree on time. Those were not my words, but in terms of skiing, the faster a skier spins the slower time moves for that skier. Meaning that when a skier future spins they are really slowing time and while everyone around them is aging they are staying the same age, theoretically spinning into the "Past" Which means "Future spinning" Should really be "fast Spinning."

Let the Shitstorm begin.

Cheers.
 
That would be because even though it seems as if they went into the distant future, they really went into the distant past. Proffesor Stepp and Einstein were really both correct. And future spinning will spin you into a different dimention.
 
Actually your wrong.

You stated that when a person is MOVING faster that time will slow down for them this is true.

Astronauts are actually living a few milliseconds in the past. but ROTATING faster is not moving faster. Your still hitting the same jump with the same amount of speed. Just because you are spinning faster or "future spinning" does not mean you are moving faster.

logic'd.
 
you're not going into the past you're just taking less relative time to get to the future, you definitely would not go into the past
 
But the people in the present would be relativly older meaning you were theoretically in the past in order for them to age as you didn't.

 
this has to be a troll because there is no way unless you're retarded that you think that you being on the earth with everything being older makes it the past

 
first off. *you're

and last time i checked rotation falls under the category of movement, mr. my daddy is a smarty
 
The parts of the body that are on the outer part of the axis are moving faster and thus not aging as quickly. If a stationary object is spinning very fast, the outer parts of the object are actually moving very fast. So according to the theory, Timmothy Wallshotz's heart is "old."
 
No technically no one has done a future spin because no one has spun past 2012, when someone does a 2160 THAT will be a legit future spin
 
Just saying, when your traveling at "99% the speed of light" physics is governed by the laws of SPECIAL RELATIVITY. Time dilation still is dealing with the present... it doesn't put something into the past just because two time frames are different.

Futurespins Worldwide
 
if everyone around you is aging faster when you are spinning, doesnt that youre going into the future? everyone is older than when you started the spin, not younger
 
You should future spin into the future where this theory has either been confirmed or denied, then, if it is true, you can future spin back into the past to tell us all about it.

Otherwise, enjoy the future.
 
463747.jpeg I don't think i care to speak much on this issue.... because i doubt any skier one newschoolers has a phd in physics and my brain hurts when i think of this stuff
 
incorrect. i think you will find that when you future spin a wormhole to the future opens and you travel into it as shown here View attachment 463826

and here

553706_10151472034125271_541090270_300898666_1054405823_n.jpg
 
didnt read it but you are wrong i think the futurenes applies to the number of the degrees ie a 2160 would be a true future spin since its only 2012
 
Futures spins have nothing to do with actually time travel math, it just means that 6 rotations is a 2160 = the future. That is what professor steve stepts theory of future spins is all about and it defies all physics.
 
OP's logic = flawed.

The only time relativistic theory is relevant is when an object is moving at the speed of light (or near the speed of light), and in the case of future spinners that have mass, they cannot travel at the speed of light because they have mass (only massless or infinitesimal massed objects can travel at the speed of light, such as photons).

Professor Stepp's theory stands.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top