Fucked up

The person who wrote that article should maybe wake up and see which movies they are sponsoring before they talk shit?
 
^^ Hey thanks Einstein, but not everyone has a major publication to bash small companies in either, which I might add, they are sponsoring.
 
does no one agree? i understand that they are 'critics' but the one movie that everyone hated the most this year was rated better than most of the others.
 
I thought hit list was good, it was booter crunk that sucked. But I think that as a major publication they need to be fairly neutral in their opinions on movies. By being really opinionated they would lose the part of their audience that they are criticizing and that wouldn't be too great for business.
 
this is an old isssue. and they said war was the greatest i think, and thats really all that matters. im going to buy it when i see it/ have spare cash
 
hmmmmmm "...and Henrik's cab 7s..." from the Travelogue review...you know, it's funny cause Henrik doesn't do any cab 7s in that movie

actually, Henrik can't do cab 7s at all, did they even watch the movie?
 
well, believe it or not, a magazine isnt "fucked up" cause they dont give a great review to your buddy's film!
 
seriously, not even talking about a "buddies" film, talkng about each film in general, just weird how they were rated
 
or how they said lil john does vanular'esque pretzels, while there are clearly no pretzels in that movie at all, let alone from little john....dont get me wrong im stoked they gave him so much props, however the review wasnt exactly accurate
 
maybe its such a shitty movie that they just couldnt bear to acctually watch the whole movie. so they just made it up hoping they were right.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top