FS: Full Tilt(Rachlie Flexon Comp's)

[uni-corn]

This is the exact same boot as the Full Tilt Bumble Bee Pro. They have a Rachlie badged thermo-flex liner, which is the exact same as the liner in the BB's. They have a Dual Density #6 flex tongue, the same as the BB's, again. The only thing that differs from the two is the power strap.

The shells are in fantastic condition, just a few scuffs. The liners are in good condition, and only have been baked once.

They are size 28.5, and have a 318 BSL. And we all know that this is really just a 27.5.

Here is the only picture i have on them right now, and i can get more upon request:

My price is $250+ shipping OBO.

 

[upthebrackette]

My 27's are a 310, so as we all know it's not a 27.5

 

[East.]

I wouldn't base a boot size on the BSL considering its only the shell size... Different shells have different lasts and thicknesses, but depending on the liner, the boot could be any size. Salomon makes the same shell for a 27 and a 27.5 boot, but they are very different sizes. If the bladder says its 28.5, then I would assume it to be a 28.5.. flexons may be narrow but that doesn't mean they are a full size smaller.

 

[uni-corn]

I can't seem to find the post, but if i understood correctly, they run a size smaller. So they are a 28.5 FT, but really fit like a 27.5.

Correct me if i am wrong though

 

[East.]

Yeah you're probably right, I've never fitted a rachlie so I wouldn't really know.

but anyways

free bumperboatssss

 

[freeskimccoy]

the shell size is smaller but the actual boot does not fit smaller, so if your a 28.5 you should cop these cause this guy is legit as they get

 

[uni-corn]

Thanks! ^

 

[nigel12]

i had a pair of 27.5 raichle and i usually wear 27.5 technicas and they do fit smaller but not a full size smaller

 

[freeskimccoy]

^^^^ thats just because those two boots fit tottally different

 

[uni-corn]

I was also partially basing this on the fact that i had 27.5 Rampages(about the same fit) and then when i got these, the BSL was 2mm off and they fit about the same on my foot.

 

[freeskimccoy]

thats interesting, ime just going by my own experiance with the boots

 

[uni-corn]

Either way, fucking sick boots!

 

[freeskimccoy]

for sure, and these are WAY sicker then the new full tilts

 

[chames]

well i ordered my ft's at 28.5 and they fit just like my dalbello 28.5's, if not a little bigger than the dalbellos.

 

[nigel12]

just letting you know how they felt compared to my technicas is all

 

[MEGAZORD]

yeah but you didnt even say which boot. You can go from the vento hvl or the diablo 130

 

[freeskimccoy]

i know i wasnt trying to be a dick, if i sounded like one

 

[masta_LE3B]

my friend loves his rachlies, he picked his up at value village for 14.50

 

[Reed.]

those boots are so gangstah

 

[upthebrackette]

You didn't, that other guy's the dick. The boots do fit a little smaller, but I wouldn't necessarily call it that, I'd rather say tighter/narrower. They fit pretty true to size, but you should know that they're going to be tight. If they fit your foot right you won't want to ski anything else. My first pair of boots were some Lange's before I started riding Flexon's and there's a huge difference. Oh no watch out, was I riding WC120's or CRL80's?!?!

Anyway, these are some sick boots, with a sick liner. The wraparound is much better then the traditional tongue IMO. If you can't find a cheap pair of these anywhere they're worth this price.