From A Real Christian's Perspective.

Catholics have added books to their Bible which goes directly against what God has said in his word.

Revelation 22:18-19

18 I warn everyone who

hears the words of the prophecy of this scroll: If anyone adds anything

to them, God will add to that person the plagues described in this

scroll. 19 And if anyone

takes words away from this scroll of prophecy, God will take away from

that person any share in the tree of life and in the Holy City, which

are described in this scroll.

Regarding praying to Mary

John 14:6

6 Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

Therefore praying to Mary is not what God intended. Mary was the vessel used, and she was a human who sinned just like you and I, the significance was that she was a virgin. God is the one who is to be worshiped and praised not the sinner who was a virgin.



 
I love how when people talk about karma, people are like oh gtfo with that hippie mumbo jumbo. That shit doesn't exist.

Yet at the same time it's perfectly acceptable to have a relationship with with some magical dude in the sky.
 
Obviously religion is bullshit... grow up... and no, its not possible to have a rational discussion and hear others opinions. One makes sense, the other doesn't. I don't see you going around and arguing with little children about the existence of Santa Claus because, in their opinion, he exists. Thats your argument, he exists. Obviously there is no proof.

Religion is also harmful. Sure, a community of fellow christians might in their own twisted way enjoy better relations and do things they wouldn't otherwise do, but when that same community is voting against gay marriage, or telling people to not wear condoms, or saying abortions are wrong, they are engaging in harmful activities against progressive, rational people. Also, its no surprise that American religious communities are affiliated with some of the most backwards mainstream politics in the first world, or that some of the most restrictive and oppressive states in the world are based upon these same beliefs.

Sad really. I suggest developing the ability to think for yourself, its dangerous thing not to.
 
HAHAHA, I don't care if you do or do not believe in religion, but what you said is so hypocritical in so many ways. You call out religions for its generalizations, then you generalize about them. You could argue the links between the world problems are far more than just religion. What really is sad is that you say for us to develop a way of thinking, but you can't just look past x or y. Groups of people will do strange things, you can't pin point religion for that. If the things you say are a direct result of religion then I suggest you look at a considerable amount of other variable. People can label the bible as black or white thinking, but you just showed the same. Nice.

While you and many others need scientific proof of a belief others don't. If someone finds comfort in the thought of life after death, then why does it bother you? The fundamentals of religion or just spiritualism can greatly help people in their times of need. Whether it does or does not exist really shouldn't matter. People can take or leave what they want out of it. ( that goes both ways, don't try and imposed religion or atheism). If you want to compare the link between religion and santa clause (which is pretty disprespectful) I'll go with it, think how much more exciting Christmas was as a kid? By saying stuff like that you're being like the kid who needs to ruin it for everyone else in the 1st grade because he found out. (Not saying you're right, just giving it at an angle your perspective.)

On that note, your train of thought is just disrespectful to other peoples culture. Not just religion, but you present an argument like that its no different than a colonialist attitude. You argue cause and effect, thats fine for your own belief, but don't go calling out other peoples culture just because you see your attitude as superior. Beliefs are what people hold close to their upbringing, you can't go around insulting peoples personal beliefs.
 
At the same time it can also make people feel worthless and depressed trying to live up to perfection to please a dude that died thousands of years ago and probably had nothing to do with the book they read on sundays.

"'ll go with it, think how much more exciting Christmas was as a kid? By saying stuff like that you're being like the kid who needs to ruin it for everyone else in the 1st grade because he found out."

A lot of things were more exciting as a kid. The world was this big unkown, everything was new and exciting. Are you saying you'd rather believe santa is real? Because that would be straight up retarded.

As far as culture. I think culture is dumb in a lot of cases. Doing something just because it's the way it's been done seems retarded. I'm all for traditions to nostalgia on and remembering your heritage and all that. I just think doing something because it's the way it's always been done hinders progress.

"Beliefs are what people hold close to their upbringing, you can't go around insulting peoples personal beliefs."

A lot of peoples beliefs are shit their parents blasted them with and they never questioned. Think about the cycle that brings up. Force religion on kids, they don't want to go to hell so they don't question it, they have kids, they force religion on their kids.

It just keeps on going. The idea of somebody that's ignorant about all kinds of things that can be proven by facts telling me how to live my life because they read some old book supposedly written by a guy who died 2 thousand years ago is just stupid to me.

 
Im not calling out the generalizations that come with religion, im calling out serious, mainstream issues that are attributed to religion. Things like the Pope lobbying against widespread condom distribution in Africa, which is plagued by HIV and AIDS, is wrong. That people adhere to a train of thought associated with this is wrong, especially when it is clearly false (also, take note that although not religious, my moral compass, miraculously, is intact)

And how is comparing Santa Claus and Christianity disrespectful? When you understand why most people don't believe in Santa Claus, the same logical reasoning can be applied to christianity. Please, explain to me the difference between the two.

And ya, sorry about being disrespectful, I'll be sure to pass that on to all the gay people who have their rights denied by christian lobby groups- because god said so.
 
good points,

'At the same time it can also make people feel worthless and depressed trying to live up to perfection to please a dude that died thousands of years ago and probably had nothing to do with the book they read on sundays. '

I guess it depends on how you interpret things. I find that most religious extremists have taken the bible way out of contest. Now I'll be honest I haven't read it in YEARS and even then I wasn't that motivated to read the details. But I've never really come across any of the hateful aspects of what some people have interpreted as 'christian'. And if there is, I take it as a grain of salt. These guidelines were written as you said 2000 years ago, it won't always have cultural relevance. Myself, I still see the fundamentals of it as good, but I certainly couldn't live by all its standards. On that note, if any church imposes the book to make people feel worthless and depressed, then unfortunately they have missed out on the main principals.

'A lot of things were more exciting as a kid. The world was this big unkown, everything was new and exciting. Are you saying you'd rather believe santa is real? Because that would be straight up retarded. '

Not the best example I guess. But I was simply pointing out that for many aspects religion in itself is harmless. You can argue religion has done some terrible things, but those are the individuals who act. There are good and bad people. Now I was just trying to point out that religion can help many people, whether its psychological or not isn't really what I'm trying to go at, all I was saying is that if someone is dying, believing that better things are to come isn't a terrible thing.

'As far as culture. I think culture is dumb in a lot of cases. Doing something just because it's the way it's been done seems retarded. I'm all for traditions to nostalgia on and remembering your heritage and all that. I just think doing something because it's the way it's always been done hinders progress. '

I suggest you look up the term culture in a sociological tense. Its far more than we do it cause its always been done. Our disagreements on this issue is a result of culture. What is important to you might not be important to me. All I'm saying is respect that, theres no need to look down on other peoples upbringing.

'A lot of peoples beliefs are shit their parents blasted them with and they never questioned. Think about the cycle that brings up. Force religion on kids, they don't want to go to hell so they don't question it, they have kids, they force religion on their kids. It just keeps on going. The idea of somebody that's ignorant about all kinds of things that can be proven by facts telling me how to live my life because they read some old book supposedly written by a guy who died 2 thousand years ago is just stupid to me.'

Fair enough, you don't have to believe anything from it. Just saying keep an open mind to other's choices. While many children are brought up by religion its not to say they don't always have a choice, but I agree many don't. Statistically, less and less people are going to church, so I don't think its the vicious cycle you are depicting. And I study sciences, I believe in facts, but there is always the unexplained, people will always need guidance. And while western education is relevant to our lives (as a result of culture) it does have its limits. Keep an open mind is all I ask, the more I learn in life the more unanswered questions I have. Look at for example a budhist monk standing on more finger, scienfitically, physiologically impossible, trying and explain in from a western context it doesn't add up. Something more is happening.

Myself I am undecided what my eventual choice is (I may never know) but im keeping doors open, knowing that the possibilities are not as black or white we make it out to be.
 
'And ya, sorry about being disrespectful, I'll be sure to pass that on to all the gay people who have their rights denied by christian lobby groups- because god said so.'

See that is a generalization that most christian people don't like gay people, when I'd say 90% are fine with it. My church will marry gay couples no questions asked. These all are acts of individuals, you can't label an entire religion because it. There are shitty socialist, there are shitty musilms, there are shitty republicans, this doesn't mean that their cause is bad its how people impose something.

 
Sorry, but while some churchs are more moderate than others, if most christians didn't hold these kinds of views, explain to me why it is one of the most contested issues in american politics...
 
Sorry, but while some churchs are more moderate than others, if most christians didn't hold these kinds of views, explain to me why it is one of the most contested issues in american politics...
 
What do you guys think about this? I'll admit that it hasn't been scientifically peer reviewed enough to necessarily be concrete evidence, but I don't think the religious people get to use that fact as a defense (seeing as how creationism/god is presented as fact even though neither have ever been successfully presented in scientific review journals).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_helmet

 
Beats me? I'm Canadian. Seems to be much less of an issue here. I guess its a reflection of American culture to an extent (also a generalization). You also have to consider the ages of democraphics to. Right now the head of state of everything are 'traditionalist', in the next 5-10 they will step down and the tail end of the 'Baby Boomers' will be in charge which tend to have more of an open mind (massive generalization too )
 
that being said, you can fault an outdated political system for that as well. I just want to clarify I am by no means an avid christian, I haven't been to church in atleast 5 years. Why anyone wants to deny gays the right to marriage is beyond me. The fact they are even debating in politics seems silly. As ideally church and state should have no overlap.
 
I've come across plenty of hateful acts but at the same time, you see that in almost every group, in people as a whole. I don't think you can demonize a whole group based on the actions of some of the people within. I agree with you for the most part I think.

Maybe it's just a coincidence but the % of people on anti depressants is pretty high in utah.

"On that note, if any church imposes the book to make people feel worthless and depressed, then unfortunately they have missed out on the main principals. "

I don't think that's the intention, but it does seem to happen.

I agree with you to an extent I guess. If believing something makes you feel better than that's fine for the person. I personally believe that knowledge is incredibly under rated these days. Right now we have pretty much everything you could possibly find out right at our finger tips yet at the same time people are incredibly ignorant. That isn't an attack on religion, their is plenty of ignorance to go around outside of religion. Doesn't seem like the general population is capable of real critical though.

“Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free our mind" Bob Marley

Yeah I quoted marley but I feel it's a really good message. That was something that always mattered a lot to me.

As far as culture I was just generalizing a lot of stuff. Was talking more about certain aspects.

"All I'm saying is respect that, there's no need to look down on other peoples upbringing"

I'm not looking down on people as much, just seems like a trend of keeping things the way they are. For al progress that's made, it seems like there's a massive push against it. Not all change is good, but being close minded towards change in general isn't helpful either.

I do try and keep an open mind. I would have a completely different set of beliefs if I didn't. I'm always open to finding out knew things even if they change what I previously thought was true. This seems like the main obstacle that a lot of people get hung up on. It'd also fairly prevalent in religion. Once they think they "know" something, their minds are closed to finding out that they were wrong. I'm not saying they are wrong, I don't "know".

"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge" - Daniel Boorstin

This is where my feelings about the people that were brought up religious comes in. If they were brought up to "know" something, their minds were never open.

I remember a sermon from one church I used to attend. It was at the time when the methodist church had that campaign "our hearts, our minds, and our doors are always open"

I remember the pastor talking about how it wasn't a good thing to have your mind open to anything. I can understand what he was saying, you don't want to pollute your mind by taking in just anything, but at the same time you can't completely close yourself off if you ever want to really learn. I know this example doesn't hold for every church, every christian, I'm just using it as an example because it's a first hand account and it applies here. A lot of people that say they "questioned their faith" at one point still had that "knowledge in the back of their heads. Yeah they had some questions and weren't sure of everything, but in the back of their mind they still knew that christianity was the truth, and that ultimately helped to guide them back into it. Again this doesn't apply to everyone, but it is a trend that happens.

You also don't see much encouragement toward the pursuit of knowledge coming from most churches. I don't here many people saying, leave the church, question everything you know, try to prove everything you have ever believed wrong, and then pursue what you found out to be true. If you never question your reality you can't really "know" that your beliefs are in any way true. Again, this applies to people in general but massively to the religious.

"Statistically, less and less people are going to church, so I don't think its the vicious cycle you are depicting."

That's true, but it's becoming a little less mainstream these days. Every community doesn't turn out in full to the local church every sunday. The cycle I was talking about still happens. The majority of religious people had religious parents who had religious parents who had religious parents. On the other hand it's not going to stick permanently in every child.

"Myself I am undecided what my eventual choice is (I may never know) but im keeping doors open, knowing that the possibilities are not as black or white we make it out to be."

I completely agree with you. I look at it the same way. I've tried to find out as much information as I can about things, but I'm always open to have everything proven wrong. I'm open to the possibility of any or all of the religions being true. I'm open to anything. We definitely agree on some things.
 
Exactly, what I don't like about religion in general is that for the most part I think religious people tend to try and shape the world they see to fit their views, either by finding roundabout ways to explain natural phenomena through god, or by ignoring what they can't explain (or more specifically what has been explained but doesn't fit with their faith) all together. Atheists (and open minded religious people to an extent) shape their views to fit the world they live in. A proven and peer reviewed scientific theory is only taken as fact until it is disproven, then it is dismantled so a new hypothesis can be put forth and proved in an empirical and objective way.

I also think their is a lot of confusion around the term, 'scientific theory'. Just because the word 'theory' is in the term, doesn't mean science is unsure it's true. The 'Theory' of Evolution is a fact, it has been proven with evidence and replicated by scientists in controlled experiments with data and evidence. The scientific use of the word 'theory' is just a place holder for the fact that if someone disproved it, we can abandon it for the truth. Everything in science is a theory, the 'theory' of gravity, the 'theory' of relativity (what Einstein is famous for). This doesn't mean they aren't facts, they are facts, make no mistake. Creationists just try and use semantics as an attack on evolution when their other arguments fail.
 
It was easier to argue for religion when the earth was flat, the center of the universe, gravity didn't exist, and neither did any real technology.

It sort of amazes me that it still has such a stronghold.
 
You guys are all making very valid points, but at the end of the day, please realize that its up to the individual to make their choice, and I ask that you respect that. No amount of insults will change their views.

If you as an atheist want to help others come to your side of the debate, do not insult them. It only hardens their beliefs.

 
so mentors, parents, doctors, and everyone else who is looking out for your well being is not worth listening to?

pull your head out of your ass.

just cause you dont like what they say doesnt mean you cant learn something from them.
 
I don't really care what other people say about my choice on religion and spirituallity, but man, I'm just living life, and waiting for those great moments, like epic shredding, vacations, and the small things in life to. Religion wise im kinda religious you know, like i said earlier, dropping into a big booter, get that little extra help going on, and it seems to work, like karma or good luck, can't be real, but it happens. Also i go to the church here and there, doesnt hurt me. However if i have the chance to go do something good, or im just lazy, religion takes the backseat, and can go aside.

Before you have your time of the month on what i just said, its fine, you can voice your opinion, but I really don't care.
 
the church you are referencing bears little to no resemblance to the church of today.

All religions are inherently good for humanity. Some people have the neccessary charisma and bad intentions to start little evil sects. every religion can fall victim to those thatt hijack it for selfish reasons.

 
My point was about the lack of choice regarding a lot of peoples beliefs.

And as far as religion, their beliefs are already pretty damn hardened.

Impenetrable bubble worlds for the win
 
Everyone was taught about the crusades in grade school. The problem is no one was taught about the Islamic Caliphates.
 
... the taliban are a bunch of islamic radicals. just in case you didn't hear about that in your "big-on-history" grade school.
 
No, I know that you said religion will always lead some to violence, but you seemed to be implying that this was less the case for christians than muslims. Although I think I attributed someone else's post to you earlier in the thread. Apologies if I did.
 
Come on man, please stop. When you take up in this argument you represent all Christians. Watch what you're saying.
 
What could possibly go wrong with this thread?

Oh wait...

I forgot the all powerful equation explaining why this site can't have a decent thread about serious shit as seen below.

(Tweens/teens) X (the coefficient of douchebaggery in adolescence) + religious conversations X (your mom and dad's insanity X your isolation level and social ineffectiveness) - the propensity to want the upper hand even if there IS no wrong or right + a few self-proclaimed adults dick swinging and preaching to the kiddies = shitshow.

My TI-83 makes the same amount of sense out of all of that as this thread does as a whole. Interesting.

You guys DO realize this debate has been raging for, oh, about 2000 years right? If you're looking to "make things clear" or something like that, you're better off trying to herd cats using mice.

 
actually, for the most parts of the western world, this debate isnt ongoing.

in top-notch educated countries (school-system quality, etc.) religion has its place, but its not overpowering science and free will in any way. think about some tribe in the amazone jungle, you would also say "yeah thats bullshit to believe in something like that"

there is a WRONG when someone brings this creationism thing, or when someone says that god is fair.

and a last thing for people defending christianity aside from personal enlightment: the dalai lama once had a conversation with a leading austrian physicist (quantum mechanics if i am right) and after the physicist explained him the "current" (whenever that was, i will look it up to find an article) state of science:

THE DALAI LAMA SAID (more or less): "WELL IF THAT IS TRUE, WE HAVE TO RETHINK RELIGION COMPLETELY."

this shows true greatness, for a man who has devoted his whole life to religion (as a religious leader nonetheless) to say something like that is awesome.

 
LOL dat is friggen helerioooosss! Like honestly be religious if you want to peeps, but don't let that shit restrict your life. Like if theres one of you that lives in BC and theres a sick pow day on a sunday, but you gotta go to church instead of going skiing, then thats just messed in my opinion. Church isn't really that fun, and you'll never get that pow day back, you know?

Oh and plus k's to this guy, thats hilarious man.
 
its great because he didnt say "waaaaaa, this is hurting my feelinnnnz"

"so dizrezpectphull du ma feeeelinz"

but he manned the fuck up and acknowledged that certain aspects of religion are completely destroyed by modern science. i am still waiting for the church to do the same. but when you remember that it took them only 400 years to acknowledge officially that the earth IS NOT the center of our universe, i will have to wait a little longer.

again, religion can have the personal thing, its great and everybody wants to feel great, but apart from that, let it go.
 
Yeah exactly this man. I did some reading off of some website, and I guess the Dali Lama has a major interest in modern science. Who woulda known?
 
Op ur first problem is that u are judging others level of "Christianity" which only god can do. U shouldn't worry about a speck of saw dust in someone's eye when u have a 2x4 sticking out of ur forehead.(not calling u a bad person only saying ur human so by ur own admission a sinner) Secondly, I'm on this forum a lot and I've come to understand that if u are going to get offended by other peoples comments it may be best to stay off of the interwebz. Lastly being Christian I'm here to tell u. Our religion has persucuted, killed, and holy wared more ethnicities in the name of god then all the other major religions combined so don't get so offended. Be a good leader and some will follow and that is all u can do. That is all
 
PLEASE READ SO YOU ARE NOT MISINFORMED

Please let me offer you some ADVICE and a CORRECTION.

First the correction; The quote you tried to produce came from a Discover Magazine interview (August 2011) of Anton Zeilinger. Luckily I'm subscribed to Discover and I've scanned the page with the quote. Zeilinger met with the Dalai Lama and showed him some basic quantum experiments. For one, he introduced the Dalai Lama to wave-particle duality which he had no qualms with. However, the Dalai Lama had issues with the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle, which states that we can not precisely know both the momentum and position of anything simultaneously. This is because in Buddhism the ultimate goal is to find cessation of earthly suffering and one path to do so is through scientific understanding of the world. But if one can not know everything (Heisenberg) how are Buddhists supposed to end their earthly suffering?

The Dalai Lama suggested Zeilinger "LOOK CLOSELY, YOU HAVE TO FIND THE CAUSE." Then he stated, "IF THIS REALLY IS TRUE AND YOU CAN CONVINCE US, THEN WE HAVE TO CHANGE OUR TEACHING."

He said he would have to change the teaching of one religion. NOT that "we have to rethink religion completely" as you so eagerly deduced for everyone.

Now for the advice; Next time you want to offer a quote to discussion please cite the quote so we can...

1. Be sure you quoted it accurately.

AND

2. Be sure it is not taken out of context.

BOTH OF WHICH YOU DID!

** I'm having trouble uploading the scanned image but here is a link to the entire interview **

http://discovermagazine.com/2011/jul-aug/14-anton-zeilinger-teleports-photons-taught-the-dalai-lama/article_view?b_start:int=2&-C
 
I certainly don't represent all Christians, why the hell would you say that. Everyone learned about the crusades, but sadly we learned very little about Islam and the world it ruled for 15 centuries or so. The later is significantly more important historically than the crusades, which accomplished nothing.
 
listen, i consider myself a christian, however i dont go to church on a regular bases basically because i do not sense god there. i sense god on top of a mountain or while hiking or spendinig an amazing time with my friends, thats where i see god. i dont hate christianity, i dont accept all of the things it has to say either, that doesnt mean im not christian. but would it be ok to you if people hated on islam or buddhism? your statement about islam is also invalid. you say they blow things for their religion's sake. not trrue, thats a religious extremist like the westboro church.
 
1) i said "more or less".

2) i didnt find the article, thank you for doing that

3) thank you for bringing the whole terminology thing and to reduce the problem to simple playing with words, seems an appropriate measure for religion-defending.

"changing our teachings" vs "rethink religion completely"

while i might have exaggerated that a little bit, you did completely underestimate the impact. "changing our teachings" to me means that religion as it is now CAN BE CHANGED OR REPLACED by scientific advancement. you wrote it as they would simply hold online-classes now that the internet is available.

really, playing with words does not help anybody. and zeilinger (sorry, just german http://www.welt.de/print-welt/article552630/Max_Planck_Einstein_und_der_Dalai_Lama.html) said himself that buddhism is far more flexible and there are almost no dogmas, except for the relationship you mentioned. SO, if the dalai lama could imagine to OMIT ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF BUDDHISM, i would call that "rethink religion completely". its like christians (or paulinists?) admitting that jesus wasnt the son of god for example, its a very basic and fundamental aspect of buddhism.

so christians, step your game up. again, since the world is not the center of the universe for you since some decades, you might actually find that a lot of the stuff could be explained.

/specific rant

and lol @ people taking the old testament for fact/as a basis for their religion while not being jews.

/general rant
 
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/3186

Read this article about the conference. It doesn't present quite as fundamental of a shake to Buddhism as I think you're thinking it does. Quantum physics currently presents its self much more ambiguously than people who are not learned in the topic believe. There is plenty of room for God or other spiritual aspects to appear at this level, especially when you examine the effects of conscious observation of wave functions. But the Heisenberg uncertainty principle plays virtually no role in the fundamental ideas of Christianity. Unlike Buddhism the way to Heaven is by faith in Christ, not in understanding our environment. So again, suggesting the Dalai Lama meant that we would have to "rethink religion completely" is just not correct. The Dalai Lama suggested physicist look harder at the matter, perhaps the uncertainty principle is incorrect. And he might be right, 100 years ago suggesting an uncertainty in matter would be much more radical than suggesting there is no uncertainty today. If they indeed are correct though he offered to find a way to incorporate uncertainty into his teachings.

With that said my education in physics has significantly affected my faith and if anything it has helped to answer questions I have about how specifically a supreme being can affect everyday life. If you're interested in the specifics feel free to pm me and I can explain my self, or suggest noted physicists and their texts that might be of interest. If you're as eager to be as open minded as you think people of faith need to be that is.
 
Back
Top