I've tried to avoid this thread, and with good reason however:
1)Could someone tell me how someone could have possibly inconspicuously packed the necessary amount of high explosives to take down each tower without getting caught.
2) The loose change video points out the "explosions" occur below the point of each impact moments before the collapse. How does each jet conveniantly impact the buildings precisely above the point where each bulk of explosives is packed? Those jetliners were travelling closer to 700 kilometres per hour, the pilots were skilled/ lucky enough to even hit the buidlings dead on, much less target a specific point.
3) The video draws parallels between the collapse of the Twin Towers and highride demolition. For the record. Before high rise demolition even takes place, months of work takes place, stripping the building of support structure, crucial concrete columns, and placing of the high explosive in strategic areas in order to attain a proper fall. None of this was done on the world trade centre buildings explosives themselves on seperate floors could not take down the building.
4) a 767's wingspan is 156 feet across, the width of each tower was approximately 220 feet. The planes had recently taken off which means they were loaded with fuel. A plane rocketing toward a tower, light airframe or not, is going to penetrate steel and concrete all the way through. Liken it to a metal spike and a concrete block. its difficult to imagine yourself pushing the spike into the block, but shoot that spike out of a compressed air gun and its going in. However this spike is loaded with hundreds of tons of jetfuel, that this concrete block is semi hollow with hallways and offices, far from 100% solid. So its no surprise that the plane penetraed all the way through to the iron core. And the Jet Fuel Burning at thousands of degrees is more than enough to weaken the steel lattice core of the bulding, whichw as designed primarily for horizontal stablization against the wind more than weight support.
Unno, these whole conspiracy theories just piss me off. Some of the points raise question, but theres a logical explanation for everything without immediately assuming the presedent's administartion wished for an excuse to finish finish Bush Sr's grudges.