Fatter than the Pontoon and Prohpet!!

schlonginator

schlonginator

Active member
147mm underfoot !! - looks so much bigger in real life

Think you know much about skis? Bonus point for guessing the ski brand

1156147576Fatbastard2.jpg
 
wtf that is damn weird, my raceboard is 185 underfoot and 178 long and aint look as short as that pic you have.

Also aint you at falls? is that you ski?
 
hahah i swaer that is just a snowboard....and those are fucking mad short...look at the size of the binding in relation to the size of the deck...
 
Unless you got skis bigger than you wanted in that thread you posted, they most certainly are. Check out the second post in the thread.
 
They are actually 146mm in the waist.

Here's some better trivia: What is the sidewall made of? It doesn't say on the webpage but I know several people here know...
 
they have to be that long man.

dont doubt people that have probably ridden the skis compared to your opinion who will never see the skis.

its logical if you think about it. 147mm underfoot, if the ski was any shorter then 180 you might as well strap flying saucers to your feet the skis would be almost perfectly round.

and yes that is sarcasm for you idiots that are going to correct me and say they wouldnt be circular.
 
wow i'm surprised some one hasn't just mounted up two snowboards yet, it'd be much easier than making a fat ass ski
 
^ever heard of shane mcconkey?, he also (snow) skied with a couple of waterskis, then went waterskiing with his spatulas
 
those would be the kingswood megafat, most people in the TGR forums would know that and could tell you about them.
 
The third person to reply identified them, so I'll give you an e-five. I don't give those out very often, so you should feel kind of proud at yourself and a little depressed at the same time.
 
good point...but all i was saying was the LOOK alot shorter...becasye they do look fucking hella short no? (because of the fatness)
 
that is incorrect sir. The other Kingsoods have ABS sidewalls though so good guess I suppose, even though I came right out and said the answer isn't on the webpage.
 
I'll just come out and say it then. They are full width bamboo cores that extend to the edge. So really there aren't sidewalls persay just one big lite core of bamboo you can see from the outside. Keeps the big ass ski as lite as possible.
 
pretty much. BUT, longer length will be seen later in the season.

And yeah, Kingswood is the shit.
 
true, but comparing the quality of Kingswood to Line is like comparing a BMW to a Kia.........(waiting to hear angry response from Line-Lovers)
 
oh, well i didnt know they were different to the other KW's. and who doesnt know they use a bamboo core
 
I don't like Line. Yeah they are probably quality skis but I just don't like the company's image, if that makes any sense. like army stencils and how they're soo obsessed with "the progression" of the sport. I like chill companys like Armada cause they seem really childish and do their thing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top