FAIL!

ButteredToast.

Active member
F PLUS!
StartFragmentWhen asked to assess how I’ve grown as a writer in the last school year, I’m not even sure where to start. Frankly, It’s a struggle to figure out what I even want to talk about. How have I grown as a writer? I believe a friend of mine put it best when he told me, “Maybe an inch or two at most. I think I’m pretty much done growing for now, seeing as I’m seventeen” (Wint, Alex). Corny jokes aside, my skills as a writer have been a complicated, confusing mess in the past year, for better or for worse. Over the last year, I have discovered that the writers of literature are nutcases, I’m way too literal for my own good, and I couldn’t care less about dead people. One may inquire, how are writers nutcases? Marriam Webster defines a nutcase as such, “A foolish, crazy, or eccentric person” (Merriam Webster). Face it, every writer fits into some category of the aforementioned nutcase. There were writers who believed that one must prance around in the woods with the animals to become enlightened, writers who believed that nothing actually meant what any educated human being would be led to think it means, and writers who believed that they could do nothing to control their future. Many of these writers seem certifiably off their rockers. Case in point – Henry David Thoreau. Thoreau, a transcendentalist writer, isolated himself from society in order to study society. Is that logical? No. Is it productive? Certainly not. Is it a good way to look like a basket case? Absolutely. To make things worse for the already doomed transcendentalists, Thoreau’s hippy-think-alike, Neil Perry from Dead Poet’s Society, who was already considerably eccentric, wound up feeling sorry for himself and proceeded to symbolically, and rather foolishly, prove a point by dawning a crown of thorns, and crucifying himself – with his father’s pistol. Fool! The poor sap didn’t even get the satisfaction of fulfilling his vengeance against his father! Through my encounters with these asinine authors, I have had the opportunity to delve deep into the farthest reaches of my soul and discover that I do not want to end up like a writer – neither dead nor bat-shit crazy. Speaking of dead people, my English teacher, the famous and notorious M**** C***** (not dead), always advised me to “Find the dead people!” About halfway through the year, after facing felonious charges for grave robbery, I discovered the true meaning of what my sensei meant. He was trying to tell me to think beyond the black and white and find the metaphors. Good God, I had been living a lie. These so-called dead people were hiding behind the text all this time, and I had no idea! I learned that writers do in fact write metaphorical messages into their pieces. I once read a story about a little boy who visited the forest and climbed birch trees. He made a thrillride out of these trees, and bent the trees from the top and rode them to theground. And guess what – it was a metaphor for sex. I never knew that a passage that talked about climbing to the top of birch trees and riding them to the ground could be about sex. Hey! That’s pretty cool! I’m a seventeen-year-old guy, and I just so happen to like sex! I had discovered that these metaphor doodads were actually pretty legit. But would this first encounter lead to an impassioned love story? Unfortunately, my relationship with dead people never came to fruition, and we never fell in love. To my dismay, I discovered that not all metaphors were sexual, and that was a disappointment to me seeing as I’m a huge fan of innuendos. On the upside, it turns out that I am not a necropheliac and I do not love dead people. Phew. Why, you ask? Well, apparently dead people are pretty damn good at hide and seek, because I could never find them. Sadly, I do not have the patience, nor the cognitive capacity to find metaphors embedded in an already dull piece of literature, assuming the metaphors are not innuendo-laden. Granted, I can now find metaphors, but sadly I’m not very good at finding them. I guess I don’t have a future in the PR department of dead people. Fortunately, M**** is a metaphor ninja, and we were able to teamwork our way to victory in the metaphor hide and seek game. I can now (somewhat) make friends with the dead people and analyze my metaphors, the Crouch way. So, how have I grown as a writer? I suppose it’s more than an inch or two, and perhaps in the neighborhood of six or even seven inches (average human penis length). Before this year in my academic career, I could have never hoped to categorize literary pieces into time periods, or find metaphors. Thankfully, I can attribute my success as a writer to M**** C***** (still not dead). Thank you, M****.EndFragment
 
do it, you won't.

your teacher will read it and laugh at you for calling Thoreau asinine, among the other retarded things you said.

well done, fucknut! A+!
 
hahahahaha sarcastic as shit. have you written anything else? and it depends on your teacher; if they like someone who thinks, instead of just does, than yes. if they prefer someone that follows the assignment, and doesnt give them hell, then NO.
 
My euro essay on love in Shakespeares works. i turned this in a while back. still waiting on a grade...

99 Problems and They All Bitches

There is a certain emotion attached to strong affection that can manipulate people in more fashions than greed, money, or power. The deep feelings for another that are known as love have such a level of influence on a person’s decisions and actions that they can be completely blinded from the truth or reality of their situation. As seen in almost every play written by Shakespeare regardless of the perspective, the themes are always the same. This trend happens to be true no matter how significant or subliminal the themes, however, the theme most consistently stressed in Shakespeare’s works is this fantastic human nature of love. It seems that Shakespeare had an acute affinity for the mystery of love and a knack for expressing his knowledge towards the ambiguity of the subject. One of the most frequent subjects of Shakespeare’s satirical representation is the human nature to act blindly out of love for another. Simply put, love, or the desire for love, can make people do some really dumb shit.

These similarities can be seen in the works Othello and Much Ado About Nothing both of which were written by Shakespeare in 1437 BC. In both works the protagonist’s love for another blinds them and allows the fabrications of the antagonist to cumulate until they make immensely hurtful and wrong assumptions about their respective hoes. In the play Much Ado About Nothing the protagonist, Claudio, who is wantin’ this beezy named Hero gets fooled into doing so. Because Don John is a total deusch-bag who can’t stand to see anyone happy, he decided to go and ruin what love had grown between Claudio and Hero. Don John made Borachio raw-dawg the town whore on his balcony and made sure that Claudio saw it in an effort to convince him that it was Hero bangin him. Claudio falls for the trick and bitches out Hero the next day as they are about to be married. He acted feverishly as he ridiculed her in front of the entire gathering for the wedding. Only later would he learn that she was always faithful to him and he was like sorry LOL, my B. Unfortunately, the lessons of love and cynicism weren’t so light hearted in the story of Othello. Othello had just married his wife Desdemona when the treachery began. He was just about to tap that slam-piece for the first time when he was interrupted with Iago’s shenanigans. Through numerous schemes and plots the antagonist Iago was able to convince his companion Othello so certainly that his wife was bangin other dudes that he murders her without taking the time to even consider if she may have really been innocent. (like he wouldn’t be able to tell) In both of the cases, the male in the relationship was so devastated by the little or false evidence that they jumped to conclusions without any regard for their bitch’s testimony. By doing this, Shakespeare showed that both men were so in love with their respective bitches that they could not handle any other form of existence while remaining with them. Therefore, the men acted out of their love to make foolish efforts to remedy the situation, in both cases only causing more harm and disorder upon themselves.

There is a valuable lesson to be learned about love and the desire to be loved that Shakespeare illustrates so well throughout his works. It seems that he wanted to show that one should not allow their love for another to gain such a firm grip on their heart that any inclination of imperfection no matter if is truth of fallacy, could destroy that love so easily or cause that person to take drastic irreversible actions against their loved ones. Shakespeare’s works also illustrate the great influential powers that love has over a person when their love for another is truly genuine. I think that finally we all need to learn a little about love from the late Notorious B.I.G. who once so eloquently said “All I want is bitches, big booty bitches.”
 
Back
Top