Faction prodigy 3.0 or k2 reckoners

L

Lago

Member
Title says it all

What are you picking and with what bindings. Need a versatile ski this year.

**This thread was edited on Oct 9th 2021 at 11:34:15am
 
Prod 3 more versatile. Reckoner more fun at low speed. Pivot 15 for either one just for the clout.

Jokes ab the binding, the Attack 13 would be a solid choice as would a Pivot 14. 15 is gonna be more expensive but the 14 can be found cheaper.
 
I was thinking about getting reckoner 102’s but they only make them im 184. Should I get the 112’s in 189? Would they be any good in the park? Would 189 basically feel like a 184 because of the rocker?
 
Got the Prodigy’s last season, unfortunately had a shit winter here and didn’t get to reaaally try em out, but they days I did get I liked them. They felt a tad heavy and a bit stiff for me so far but I would recommend to a friend. I found there are some great options at the underfoot range. Mounted pivot 14’s on mine, 2020 top sheet with the forza for exponential steeze
 
14330162:BLandz said:
I was thinking about getting reckoner 102’s but they only make them im 184. Should I get the 112’s in 189? Would they be any good in the park? Would 189 basically feel like a 184 because of the rocker?
Click to expand...

The 112 is 184 and 191. Looks to have a good deal of rocker but also measures true. How tall are you? I have the 102s on my bench waiting to mount.
 
14330232:mystery3 said:
The 112 is 184 and 191. Looks to have a good deal of rocker but also measures true. How tall are you? I have the 102s on my bench waiting to mount.
Click to expand...

He’s trolling
 
14330237:animator said:
He’s trolling
Click to expand...

No im not lmao im 6’3 I need tall man skis so I don’t wanna ride the 102’s in 184 they would be shit for me. Idk if im willing to ride 112’s in the park tho
 
Just for reference I’m 6’1 and my 184 reckoners are perfect. They’re actually a lot longer than my 183 wides because of the rocker. I wouldn’t rule them out because of your height.

14330255:BLandz said:
No im not lmao im 6’3 I need tall man skis so I don’t wanna ride the 102’s in 184 they would be shit for me. Idk if im willing to ride 112’s in the park tho
Click to expand...
 
14330255:BLandz said:
No im not lmao im 6’3 I need tall man skis so I don’t wanna ride the 102’s in 184 they would be shit for me. Idk if im willing to ride 112’s in the park tho
Click to expand...

My b thought it was a shit post. Lengths are the same across the board so for the Reck 112 it’ll be 184 or 191…. 191 is a lot of ski for anybody to be throwing around in the park.
 
14330379:goatmaster said:
I bought a pair of prodigy 3.0. About to put squires on them to save some weight because they are not a light ski
Click to expand...

Are you used to super light skis as they aren’t very heavy for their size.

I actually put Attack 16s on my 2021 190cm 3.0 Collab versions to add some weight. Was told after the fact that the shiny Collab topsheet might be lighter than the regular dimpled bear graphics top sheet material. Mine weigh about 120gr under their spec weight vs all my other 21 Factions that are all slightly over spec. ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top