Everything You Know Is Wrong
- Thread starter Orrin
- Start date
Bill.Nye
Active member
That's such tiny piece of evidence in the face of all the other evidence about the case though. The skull has human (male) DNA. It looks like a hydrocephalic skull. It may have been bound in some way during his life as an attempt at treatment. The human/alien hybrid hypothesis is really not supported at all, and makes vast assumptions (that aliens exist, that they visited earth, that humans and aliens could interbreed, etc etc). There's a reason theories like this are outside of the mainstream; if the evidence supported it, I'm sure every anthropologist would cream their pants at the possibility of human/alien hybrids. The reason they don't believe it is because the evidence just isn't there.
Panchuk
Active member
I think the biggest problem is the interbreeding. What are the chances that an alien race is capable of reproducing with humans? Improbable for sure, our genetic make-up would be very different and impossible to reproduce together. It's like saying we could have sex with any animal currently living and it would create a fucked up hybrid version that is also capable of reproducing with each other.
Will def watch later. I like the title.
Honestly I I've felt that way for a long time. People don't really KNOW as much as they think. Once you KNOW things, you close your mind to the realm of possibilities including the possibility that you weren't correct in the first place.
Then again that probably has nothing to do with the thread or video.
Honestly I I've felt that way for a long time. People don't really KNOW as much as they think. Once you KNOW things, you close your mind to the realm of possibilities including the possibility that you weren't correct in the first place.
Then again that probably has nothing to do with the thread or video.
Allegrath.
Member
BS in Psychology indeed...
steezenskis
Active member
so there is some slightly convincing evidence for his theory. the problem is that there is an overwhelming amount of evidence for the current theory of human origins which is why this video isnt really going to change many opinions.
McFellon
Active member
This was something that I'd like to point out.
OP + the lecture say how we are so different from other animals, but for the vast majority of human existence we lived at a very, very basic level not all that far above animals.
Also, why is it more likely that aliens came down and spliced pre-human DNA with theirs than archeologists just not having found a few really old skeletons to prove our evolution from our ancient ancestors? It seems like there's much more logical conclusions that can be drawn.
OP + the lecture say how we are so different from other animals, but for the vast majority of human existence we lived at a very, very basic level not all that far above animals.
Also, why is it more likely that aliens came down and spliced pre-human DNA with theirs than archeologists just not having found a few really old skeletons to prove our evolution from our ancient ancestors? It seems like there's much more logical conclusions that can be drawn.