Earth on course for eco 'crunch'

ThaLorax

Active member




Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/science/nature/7696197.stm

Published: 2008/10/29 00:06:57 GMT

Earth on course for eco 'crunch'













S BO

S IIMA









_45153600_paper_autocat_226.jpg


Reckless consumption comes at a high cost, the report warns













E IIMA

S SF The planet is headed for an ecological "credit crunch", according to a report issued by conservation groups.

The document contends that our demands on natural resources overreach what the Earth can sustain by almost a third.

The Living Planet Report is the work of WWF, the Zoological Society of London and the Global Footprint Network.

It says that more than three quarters of the world's population

lives in countries where consumption levels are outstripping

environmental renewal.

E SF

This makes them "ecological debtors", meaning that

they are drawing - and often overdrawing - on the agricultural land,

forests, seas and resources of other countries to sustain them.

Inline Embbeded Media

This is the embedded player component





caption WWF's David Norman says the world will need two planets by 2030

END - caption

end of the embedded player component

END of Inline Embedded Media

The report concludes that the reckless consumption of "natural

capital" is endangering the world's future prosperity, with clear

economic impacts including high costs for food, water and energy.

Dr Dan Barlow, head of policy at the conservation group's

Scotland arm, added: "While the media headlines continue to be

dominated by the economic turmoil, the world is hurtling further into

an ecological credit crunch."

The countries with the biggest impact on the planet are the US

and China, together accounting for some 40% of the global footprint.

The report shows the US and United Arab Emirates have the

largest ecological footprint per person, while Malawi and Afghanistan

have the smallest.







S IBOX















_45152028_foot_print_country_466.gif










The map shows hectares' worth consumed in goods and services











E IBOX





"If our demands on the planet continue to increase at the same rate,

by the mid-2030s we would need the equivalent of two planets to

maintain our lifestyles," said WWF International director-general James

Leape.

In the UK, the "ecological footprint" - the amount of the

Earth's land and sea needed to provide the resources we use and absorb

our waste - is 5.3 hectares per person. S IBOX





o.gif










_45152043_orang_ap_226.jpg












inline_dashed_line.gif






S ILIN Nature loss 'dwarfs bank crisis'

E ILIN











E IBOX





This is more than twice the 2.1 hectares per person actually available for the global population.

The UK's national ecological footprint is the 15th biggest in

the world, and is the same size as that of 33 African countries put

together, WWF said.

"The events in the last few months have served to show us how

it's foolish in the extreme to live beyond our means," said WWF's

international president, Chief Emeka Anyaoku.

"Devastating though the financial credit crunch has been, it's

nothing as compared to the ecological recession that we are facing."

He said the more than $2 trillion (£1.2 trillion) lost on

stocks and shares was dwarfed by the up to $4.5 trillion worth of

resources destroyed forever each year.







S IBOX





o.gif










_45152044_mammal_live_index_226.gif










The index tracks population trends in 1,161 populations of 355 mammal species

It shows an average 19% decrease, with the most serious declines in the tropics











E IBOX





The report's Living Planet Index, which is an attempt to measure the

health of worldwide biodiversity, showed an average decline of about

30% from 1970 to 2005 in 3,309 populations of 1,235 species.

An index for the tropics shows an average 51% decline over the same period in 1,333 populations of 585 species.

A new index for water consumption showed that for countries such

as the UK, the average "water footprint" was far greater than people

realised, with thousands of litres used to produce goods such as beef,

sugar and cotton shirts.

"In Britain, almost two thirds [62%] of the average water

footprint comes from use abroad to produce goods we consume," said Mr

Leape.
 
Wow, the UAE sucks with their eco footprint for such a small country, they may have amazing buildings and shit but they better get their act together with that.
 
Interesting conundrum here. Humans will only be able to survive on Earth if we either reduce our population or we devise new technology that will sustain ourselves at this current capacity.
 
personally, i think depopulation is the only way that will work. i don't have enough faith in humanity to see them making the drastic changes necessary for sustainablility.

i remember seeing in another thread a while back that you suggesed reading Cradle to Cradle, was that you? If not, I highly suggest reading that for anybody that cares about the environment.
 
, according to a report issued by conservation groups.
dont listen to these people, there fucking insane. "Global Warming" is fake, Climate Change is real, and is a natural thing. Talk to the right people, not the liberal hippy fuckers writing this article.
 
this is kinda like when we thought that there was only enough oil for the next 30 years.... in 1970! Ironically we've had about 30 years left every year since.
grow up people - we're not gonna perish - were not that stupid
 
Its better than using our own planets resources. Seriously, sustainable energy is so far off, so until then we got to make due with the technology we have. We have to use the materials that are available to us in this universe.
 
Hahaha

You really believe that sustainable technology is so far off that we'll have the technology to mine other planets first? Taking into account that we can't even get a single human on another planet yet? You are stuck in a fantasy that I'm not even going to bother getting into.
 
oh, quite the contrary. no, i doubt we'll parish but we will see a shit ton of problems resulting from ignorant people like yourself who don't care because we "think" we've been running out of resources. It is a fact that we are using up almost every resource we utilize in modern society faster than we can replenish it. That means that we will run out of resources at some point unless we do something about it. Reffering to one example of a failed prediction in order to make yourself feel better that you are destroying the very place you live is not a good excuse, it's fucking stupid.

It is also a fact that nearly ever biosphere on earth is on decline.

Wake up people. See what we're doing so ourselves. It's not just about you, it's not just about humans, it's about the preserving future of Earth for everyone and everything that lives/exists here.
 
Mine the moon? Everyone should be worried about ALL of our natural resources, not just the ones that create energy. All of our precious minerals and metals will disapear sometime too. So mining other celestial bodies is a must at some point.
 
i know we'll run out at some pointbut i just think that we have the resources to figure it outhaving faith that we can figure it out is not ignorance. If you think we don't have the technology to survive, you sir, are ignorant
And i don't support ruining the environment or whatever you think i support
 
uhh, that was my point. we are very close to having the technology necessary for complete sustainability. i agree that we can figure it out. the question is, do people care enough to figure it out and pull through with it?

what we have to realize here is that the earth works in interconnected cycles. if you fuck up one cycle it is going inevitably mess with another one. right now the biggest cycle we're ruining is the population cycle. there are way too many humans to be sustainable and there is nothing to keep our population at a balance as there is for almost every other species. rabbit populations are kept in check by fox. if the fox eat too many rabbits, the fox die from starvation and the rabbits overpopulate allowing the fox to flourish again.

is anybody following what I'm trying to say?
 
dont listen to these people, there fucking insane. "Global Warming" is fake, Climate Change is real, and is a natural thing. Talk to the right people, not the liberal hippy fuckers writing this article.
 
I'll agree with you that Global Warming is a farce (to a certain extent) and that Climate Change is a naturally occuring event (again, to a certain extent) but that last sentence is so ignorant it's almost funny. This is why I have no faith in humanity. How can we ever solve a problem such as this when we can't even get along with each other?
 
Back
Top