I realize that many of you who are lending cred to this thread know him personally, and that many of those shots portrayed a talented skier with great fundamentals and great style. And to me, his skiing background is irrelevant; I'm not instantly opposed to being open to voting for him because he's an aerialist.
But, you do have to acknowledge the irony of recommending to the voting public that a skier, who is actually performing aerials maneuvers in his edit, should win a spot for the 'King of Style'. Kinda sorta goes against everything this newschool thing is about, doesn't it?
I dunno. It's much more likely for me to vote for somebody who threw a shot of a cork 5 blunt in their edit, than to homie for his no grab lay double-full full or whatever. It's a style-based contest, no?