Double Cork 3: possible?

TheQuailman

Active member
so since a cork 180 is possible can't someone through a cork 180 and keep rotating 180 more degrees into a double cork 360?
 
Stefan Thomas does one of that hip Jump in Grizzly gultch in that Utah movie form liek last year I think, Dont know wat its call it looks hell sick though it is possible and if done properley looks really fukin kool
 
i dont think he means double the spins, but double the cork? mayb liek double flatspins, im not really sure
 
I predict that this thread will last like 4 pages long and will stop when someone will post an video of Laurent Favre doing a dub cork 3. Favre is the man.
 
so if i understand this right, in a cork 180, you get off most off axis at the 90 (lets say it done perfectly so its not completely confusing) almost like that motocross thing where they get all sideways, cept they don't rotate (off axis straight air) okay so you do that with a 180, now you're at the height of your jump, and you come back to parallel with the ground and you keep you cork momentum going so you are doing a sw 180 that is off axis, and you will come around 360 similarly as if you were doing a sideways frontflip. i have to break it up into sections because its so hard to visualize. hope that was somewhat helpful
 


so like that with switch cork 1 after? But I have no idea how you would do a switch cork 1
 
I don't think it's physically possible to do a double cork 3. Maybe if you went inverted but that's a frontflip cork 3, not a cork 3.

Even a regular cork 3 is almost inverted.
 
k i dont think its possible cause to do a corked 180 you have to sort of get yourself off axis before going in the air by carving really hard, so you could probably do a corked spin after the corked 180 but definetly not another corked 180
 
yeah, thats what i was attempting to say. like pretend in that gif that he doesn't land when he lands, but that he has time to do a 180 after that, he dips his right shoulder to do the first, i think he'd dip his left for the sw 1.
 
No one ever fuckin said a cork 180 is possible. Its gonna be argued about FOREVER. And i didnt think double corks were possible below a 720?
 
yea i really want to huck a cork 3 and try to see if i end up doign a dub cork 7...cause that woudl be fuckign dope as fuck...and i would claim the shit out of it
 
What if you did a cork 1 to cork 3 to make a double cork 5.

I think the problem is doing any extra flip in a cork is adding a 360. So doing a double cork 10. You would do a cork 7 and then add a flip and that flip gets you the extra 360 plus the double. So if that makes sense you would have to invert in a way you on to a 180.

but I want to try it so bad! I’ll do it on renal first.
 
14278712:ColoradoSki said:
What if you did a cork 1 to cork 3 to make a double cork 5.

I think the problem is doing any extra flip in a cork is adding a 360. So doing a double cork 10. You would do a cork 7 and then add a flip and that flip gets you the extra 360 plus the double. So if that makes sense you would have to invert in a way you on to a 180.

but I want to try it so bad! I’ll do it on renal first.

A dub cork 5 would probably be easier to do as 3 to 1 since the pretzel rotation of uncorking the 3 would slow your rotation. Just setting a dub 7 then pretzling like ahall does would be a lot more feaseable.
 
ur wrong but also right. it’s should be possible but not because we’ve done cork 1s it’s possible because cork/flat 0 has been done so

dub7-cork1=dub5.

dub7-cork3=dub3.

cork 0 is basically a pretz 3 after a cork 3 contorting ur body
 
14278982:sullivanobrien_ said:
ur wrong but also right. it’s should be possible but not because we’ve done cork 1s it’s possible because cork/flat 0 has been done so

dub7-cork1=dub5.

dub7-cork3=dub3.

cork 0 is basically a pretz 3 after a cork 3 contorting ur body

Congrats, you sound more ignorant on double corks than people posting 14 years ago before double corks existed!
 
14278712:ColoradoSki said:
What if you did a cork 1 to cork 3 to make a double cork 5.

I think the problem is doing any extra flip in a cork is adding a 360. So doing a double cork 10. You would do a cork 7 and then add a flip and that flip gets you the extra 360 plus the double. So if that makes sense you would have to invert in a way you on to a 180.

but I want to try it so bad! I’ll do it on renal first.

People have been doing double rodeo/flat 5s for a while, it’s just a rodeo 3 to rodeo 1. I’m sure it’s much easier though because rodeos are way flippier than corks but I’m sure we’ll see a dub cork 5 someday
 
14278989:skierman said:
Congrats, you sound more ignorant on double corks than people posting 14 years ago before double corks existed!

i don’t see how this is wrong and usually things u say aren’t very agreed with
 
Back
Top