Don't close your blinds...

downey, do you remember 9/11 or do you just look away from that disaster when talking about the enonomy and jobs? whether it was bush or anyone else in office, we would have seem the worst decline in history. i understand you don't like bush, but dont let that emotion validate all of your claims.

 
too bad once you stop mean old saddam from killing his wife and kids you escort them back inside their house, lock the door, and proceed to rape them and burn their house down

________________________________________

Let's do it for Tommy!

CCF to Victory
 
not to mention that this is bltant propaganda designed to remove complexities of any given situation and breed nationalist ideas and a closed minded obedience

________________________________________

Let's do it for Tommy!

CCF to Victory
 
the B.L.S. is hardly the media. as for previous 'depressions' ( i believe this has only happend once) there was this thing called world war II... it kind of kicked us out of the depression really fast. thats gotta screw up the average a little bit eh?

Mercy's eyes are blue

When she places them in front of you

Nothing holds a roman candle to

The solemn warmth you feel inside

 
Are you mad more jobs are being created? If you are mad about that, you'll never be happy. The only thing you keep writing is: just wait and see how fucked up america is, because it appears the economy is improving.

Want a free ipod, click here

If you have any questions on how this works, send me a message or email me
 
they dont like bush so they are going to try to come up with different excuses and false claims to make the administration look bad. get over it.

 
except for suddam stayed in his own country. he never attacked or threatened america or any other country (except for iran, and when he did we put his ass back in line) there are many other corupt evil dictators in the world. should the US go invade all of them too?

- - - - - - - - - -

boom
 
Simon, we should obviously attack elsewhere. You're entirely right, it would even be great for the economy. And anewmorning, it's called a 'recession' with an 'r'. Not a 'd' like 'dumbass' for instance. Pretty sure there's been more than 1 of those since 1929. You guys seem to have all the facts though, since every one else is just a raving liberal.

-------------------

Sweet, thanks to you fuckers our country is being run by a Bush and a Dick for another four years. Good job guys. Way to get out there and vote!
 
okay... my mistake... i thought you written about multiple depressions for the sake of hyperbole, but upon re reading your posts, i see that i was mistaken. recessions it is.

Mercy's eyes are blue

When she places them in front of you

Nothing holds a roman candle to

The solemn warmth you feel inside

 
i found this post in the Proud To Be An American cult, written by supilot, an NS member. its pretty damn good if you ask me and its worth a read even if it is his opinion.

Is it possible to measure the benefits, political and social impacts of winning the Cold War? Reagan was never given his due credit by his liberal peers for winning this psychological war. They were against his defiant stances. They even suggested disarming. However, Americans and other citizens worldwide now benefit because of his persistence. Actually, it’s impossible to estimate the economic, political and social damage the world could have witnessed if he listened to the pessimists.

President Bush’s challenge is similar. The overthrowing and capture of Saddam Hussein provides yet untold benefits that will also prove to be immeasurable. John Kerry and other contemporary liberals shadow their predecessors. They now suggest abandoning the War on Terror. However, if George W. Bush follows the example of his predecessor, future generations of Americans will reap the rewards of his firmness. The results will be apparent not only to Americans, Afghans and Iraqis, but the entire Middle East and the rest of the world respectively.

As lone superpower with financial, military and social influence unlike the world has ever witnessed, we are obvious targets of countries with once proud histories. They have fantasies of regaining regional and worldwide influence. Others dislike our freedoms and want to restrain them. All share dreams of diminishing the leverage of the United States. Their methods could be economic, diplomatic or warlike, but their desired end is the degradation of the power and influence of the United States.

The history of the world proves that our liberties and opportunities are unlike any others that have been ever known to man, regardless of empire or dynasty. The opportunities that we enjoy today should be defended and protected for future generations.

In the history of civilization, tenures of high stature and influence are relatively brief. The previously mentioned empires, dynasties or monarchies’ reign eventually end. However, we should be determined to ensure that the sands of freedom and opportunity don’t slip through our fingers as we now bear the torch. We have to be diligent in order to preserve the rights that we enjoy today. However, freedom is something to protect from internal as well as external forces.

Most liberals, however noble their cause of world peace, lack the vision, understanding and foresight needed to ensure that long term peace can be willed to future generations.

Although Saddam’s nuclear ambitions haven’t been proven entirely, he has possessed and used other chemical and biological weapons in the past. His inventories of these weapons are unaccounted for. As Iraqi scientists disappear, Iranian enrichment materials are appearing. North Korea and China have been proud to boast their nuclear capabilities. Other countries with fantasies of our demise have also sought nuclear weapons.

Suggestions by John Kerry and others on abandoning the War on Terror make as much sense as their suggestions of disarming during the height of the Cold War. Fortunately, we have leadership in place with the vision to reject such ideas.

Recent polling suggests that most people worldwide would like John Kerry to assume the presidency. Those numbers includes terrorists and others with interests that aren’t necessarily compatible with ours.

George W. Bush is constantly targeted for ridicule because he is adamant about the significance of winning the War on Terror. Although foreign and domestic pressure rises because of his insistence, the President must never fall prey to their biased recommendations. Winston Churchill once said, 'People who are not prepared to do unpopular things and to defy clamor are not fit to be Ministers in times of stress'.

The president deserves our gratitude for his leadership. Although we may never fully realize or appreciate the avoided outcomes, history will surely thank him if he persistently holds course.

 
^that is the stupidist shit i have ever heard. ok so fifty years from now we can look back and thank bush for the second great depression and for starting WW3 and possibly for the nuclear destruction of our plant it is possible cause he thinks the US can win a nuklear war. it wouldnt be war it would be a holocaust and no one can win that

 
so the usa is the world police? do you want to be known as the country that goes around with a big stick and enforces what we claim is 'right'? we need to fix what is wrong with our country before going off and killing innocent civilians with our 'accurate' bombs. grrrrrrrrr

skiing is life

without skiing, i would have no life

pray for peace and powder

there is no skiing on a destroyed planet
 
sure, I will use the cheaper oil, yeah thats a given...how could i not? - Its inevitable so long as big bussiness continues using so much fossil fuels and not incorporating alternative energy on a massive scale. BUT what happens when oil runs out in 30 years? Its gonna happen sooner or later and cheaper prices just fucks the wound.

STARMAN DIED IN VAIN!!! Support Tito the partisan! 'Eat the poor'
 
Dear god... I didn't bother reading this trash until now, and I'm honestly irritated. I mean, the day before the election, I posted one of the most imperessive comments on war that I've ever read, and it dropped right off the from page. This piece of awful writing gets three pages of replies. That sums up this site pretty well... god damn.

------------

In a haze

A stormy haze

I’ll be around

I’ll be loving you

Always

Always

Here I am

And I’ll take my time

Here I am

And I’ll wait in line

Always

Always...
 
oversimplification. period. turns out saddam wasn't killing his wife.

oh and I love how 9/11 decided to rear it's ugly head in this forum. I love how people justify attacking Saddam just because Osama attacked the US... yup. that makes a whole lotta sense

_______________________

Screw this I'm going skiing
 
man what a terrible analogy. and you think iraq is the only country who oppresses their people, c'mon man. comes down to that god told w to do it and ovviously money.

Line Skis

Logic Headware

Orage

Jibij Proshop
 
since this is a stupid idea thoguht up after lots of time with no sleep, im puting it in a stupid post. but you know, if it werent for the nukes... which are a freightening thought themselves... right now would be the perfect time for some other country to attack us. were all fighting each other and most of our troops are off in iraq. north korea could just walk right in. seriously though, come on canada, make your move.

__________________

You know the Nazis had pieces of flair that they made the Jews wear.

once back when i was a fetus i was aborted. it didn't hurt at all, but i was also high on life at the time. - thisangelicrage

its not rape....its surprise sex. you wake up and SURPRISE you had sex with me haha - huckster989

liberals think killing babies can be both fun and profitable, while conservatives think killing foreigners can be both fun and profitable - ice-is-scary

bitch, whered my watch go - simon, wrist deep...?
 
Back
Top