Does weight really matter that much?

stinky_cheese

stinky_cheese

Active member
so i really don't know a whole lot about touring but i really want to get into it. I'm looking into getting a new setup, fatter than my resort set up which is 4frnt devastators with griffons. however, i want to be able to ski my new set up in resort though (my home resort is alta) so i was leaning towards more of frame bindings over tech bindings.

so my question is, will this added weight from the frame bindings really make that big of a difference when i'm touring? and if i did end up getting tech bindings, how do they do in resort skiing?
 
I was in a similar position as you. I lift ski 90% of the time, and I'm very glad I got Guardians. Weight does matter quite a bit, but it's more about getting your muscles tuned up to touring.
 
13579851:MTPOW said:
I was in a similar position as you. I lift ski 90% of the time, and I'm very glad I got Guardians. Weight does matter quite a bit, but it's more about getting your muscles tuned up to touring.
Click to expand...

yeah i think'll i'll go with the guardians then or something similar. because i'll go hike every once in a while but i think i'll still mainly use these skis for resort
 
If you're using your setup at the resort tech bindings aren't even an option. Even Beasts aren't ideal.

Weight matters especially on long tours, though, for sure. Having to lift your heelpiece 1000 times makes a difference. I did two days this weekend, first with Tour F12s (the lightest frame binding possible) and once with Radicals and it's not comparable.
 
There are also binding inserts which allow you to have holes for both a touring binding and a regular alpine binding on the same ski so you can swap between the two. Here's a link to the quiver killer site

http://quiverkiller.com/
 
13580698:J.D. said:
If you're using your setup at the resort tech bindings aren't even an option. Even Beasts aren't ideal.

Weight matters especially on long tours, though, for sure. Having to lift your heelpiece 1000 times makes a difference. I did two days this weekend, first with Tour F12s (the lightest frame binding possible) and once with Radicals and it's not comparable.
Click to expand...

13580942:ChasingFlakes said:
also lets not forget that the pivot point of frame bindings is sooo freaking unnatural.
Click to expand...

so what are you saying? don't get frame, get tech and don't ski them in resort? i really want to ski them in the resort though, are frame bindings actually that bad in resort too?
 
13581237:stinky_pete said:
so what are you saying? don't get frame, get tech and don't ski them in resort? i really want to ski them in the resort though, are frame bindings actually that bad in resort too?
Click to expand...

Frame is fine ive skied my guardians for 3 seasons and competed in freeride comps on them. they just walk like shit. Get them for for though
 
13580942:ChasingFlakes said:
also lets not forget that the pivot point of frame bindings is sooo freaking unnatural.
Click to expand...

On the better ones, yeah. It's a compromise that had to be made to make them less riser-y and more durable. Fritschis have a pivot point that's much farther back.

13581237:stinky_pete said:
so what are you saying? don't get frame, get tech and don't ski them in resort? i really want to ski them in the resort though, are frame bindings actually that bad in resort too?
Click to expand...

Get frames and just deal with the fact that they're much worse on the up than tech bindings. If you're skiing them in the resort you have no choice in the matter. And they're still totally usable, it's not like they're Alpine Trekker level bad, they're just not as good as other options at it.
 
13582810:TheBigApple said:
I'd poke my eyeballs out if I had to do big ascents on frame bindings. That's why you get two set ups.
Click to expand...

On the flip side i skied my bc set up on the resort after a few slack laps., dfits and khions and it was god awful. those boots do not ski well inbounds.
 
Frame bindings are 50/50 for me. I love my Guardians, but they are very prone to breaking (all in the same way, metal bars snapped)

I had the unfortunate mishap of having mine break 6 miles away from my car and had to ski back on one ski on flat ground. It sucked ball sack, but hey I made it.

What I didn't realize when first getting into tech setups is they DO NOT ski at all like a traditional alpine set up. It takes some time to get used to, boots aren't as stiff, bindings aren't as forgiving, but they are amazing on the uphill.

Get frame style bindings first and find out if you really like the BC and touring. Then, like said above, invest in a second tech set up. I use my frame bindings if I want to build a booter or ski aggressively (jump cliffs/mini golf lines/short days) and use my tech set up if I'm trying to bag peaks or going on multi day missions.
 
13595431:stinky_pete said:
those look super cool. have you heard anything about them?
Click to expand...

I've read a few reviews, and spoken with a couple friends who use it and they all love the system. It has its drawbacks, but for me it seems like the best of both worlds. According to a guy at a local ski shop, they are going to be mainstream in the next few years.
 
13595485:Jaybrtn said:
I've read a few reviews, and spoken with a couple friends who use it and they all love the system. It has its drawbacks, but for me it seems like the best of both worlds. According to a guy at a local ski shop, they are going to be mainstream in the next few years.
Click to expand...

what have you heard are the drawbacks of them?
 
13595863:stinky_pete said:
what have you heard are the drawbacks of them?
Click to expand...

The slight increase in weight over a full dynafit system, ice sometimes getting stuck in the plate, easily removed though, time to swap toe pieces (a few seconds as opposed to flipping a switch). Mostly minor things.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top