Do full tilts live up to the hype?

5choffield

5choffield

Member
I've had SPKs for the last three years and I'm starting to outgrow them. Everyone says Full Tilts are the ultimate park boot but are they really? I'm just about 100% park and I need a boot that can take slams and last. Anyone who's had FTs have an opinion?
 
well if they fit correct and all you want to do is ski park they are a great boot. i have fts and they are nice and all but i dont get near the amount of performance id like when skiing out of the park they are to soft and if i go to the #10 tounge they just feel to stiff,

i cant really answer the question of do they live up to the hype. cause i dont know this hype
 
Full tilts are great boots if they fit your foot. All feet are completely different and you don't want to purchase a boot because of the name. Go to a boot-fitter and get fitted up.
 
Yeah like everybody said they are a great boot, if they fit you. Yes they are good for park because of the design, but people need to realize they can get as much or more performance out of a boot that fits them better, even if it isn't a 'park boot'.
 
Good for park because of their design? Their design is meant for a 1980's straight race ski. A ski boot is a just a piece of plastic. Buy what fits and flexes for you and you will have a good boot.
 
There is so much more to a ski boot then that. How a boot flexes laterally and how stiff the sole is, is something which was not as inportant when rachiles were designed. Since then the whole way we ski has changed and full tilt have not advanced. So although they still work they certainly are not at the same level as boots designed more recently.
 
If you can't comprehend why then that's not my problem. But yes, the design does lend itself to being a good boot for park skiing.
 
I tried a bunch of them on and ended up buying the booter. Felt great in the store and for my first couple days in them, then I started getting the worst pains everywhere in my feet/shins all season. Never again... But its totally different from person to person.
 
A BOOT FITTER IS AN ABSOLUTE MUST WITH FULL TILTS... If the boots fit your feet incorrectly you will have a bad time.
 
honestly, no they are pretty bad boots. no performance and all hype. downvotes will come to this from all the butthurt people on this site.
 
honestly, no they are pretty bad boots. no performance and all hype. downvotes will come to this from all the butthurt people on this site.
 
Obviously, I am simplifying things. I just want kids to know that finding the right fit and flex will trump whatever the marketing behind the boot is. It doesn't matter what style of boot you get, just as long as the shell fit, flex, and geometry are proper for your needs. If you put your available options the same playing field (view them as simple pieces of plastic rather than a park boot or a race boot) then you will focus on the fit, flex, and geometry and most likely find the right option.
 
This is good advice but considering the boot it's self is still inportant. Having a boot with too little lateral stiffness may still hinder a rider even if the fit is amazing. Sure get the fit right but the boot it's self is still a factor.
 
My answer, no. They are comfy and light-weight which is always a plus, but are pretty crappy. Buckles break, the construction isnt high quality and just overall arent the best boot, They ski well but are not a quality product that always breaks at the worst times.
 
I have the Drop Kicks and love them. Have had no issues with any buckles breaking and they have been surprisingly warm even on cold days. Super comfy and light. I ride them in the park and the backcountry, have a six tongue and an 8 tongue. I like how i can change the flex of the boot by just changing the tongue. No bolts to remove or grinding of the boot required like most other boots.
 
Just wondering if this is a common thought? Personally I think its much easier to remove a bolt or two to adjust the flex then having to carry a spare set of tongues in your pocket.
 
My thought is removing a bolt (or two) causes the rebound of the boot to be effected. It seems it causes the boot to seem sluggish when releasing pressure off your shins.
 
Ok so maybe having a cuff where you remove 1 bolt but keep a second to keep the rebound more solid. I know what you mean about a softer cuff with no bolts so maybe a better solution is what head and salomon use where you start with 2 bolts and remove just one to alter the flex.
 
This and the fact that its a re-marketed boot design thats been around for ages. There are other companies besides Full Tilt.
 
Even if they fit your foot they are still a complete fucking waste of your money.

A company spends all of its money on marketing and you turd brains can't get down on your knees fast enough.

The design is pushing 40 years old, the plastic is absolute shit, the components break faster than an 90year old lady's hip, and it is a right pain in the ass to modify for different feet. Oh it skis like shit too.

I can't decide what is a biger waste of mater, the origional flexon design on the one they bought off Roxa. Both are total shit.

Yet, for some reason known you folks can't keep your cock holsters silent on how awesome they are.

Whatever, it's most likely your parents money anyway.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top