Demonoid gone forever?

GatoGordo

Active member
I went to their website, and this is the only thing that is on the site.

"The CRIA threatened the company renting the servers to us, and because

of this it is not possible to keep the site online. Sorry for the

inconvenience and thanks for your understanding."

Does this mean that it's gone forever, or is it going to be like what happened before, where they won't let Canadians use it?
 
WHAA!?!?! o man this blows! i think they already banned Canadians from the site. im pretty sure it will be down for a while. it was the best torrent site, do you no of any others?
 
ah shit ... they need to find some place in the international waters to base their operations... like thepiratebay.org
 
eff man.

this blows. i was going to go home on break and download music. not anymore... bumer
 
shit shit shit

first they made me go to thr trouble of getting past the no canadian thing

now this!

faccckk
 
i use this site a lot, just went on it like 10 min ago to check something but then this fuckin CRIA...

found this from:http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9095/Demonoid+Shut+Down+by+the+CRIA+Again!

This time it may be for good - at least in Canada that is.

It was about a month and a half ago that Demonoid was shut down due to apparent pressure by the Canadian Recording Industry Association(CRIA). The site reappeared a few days later, but was forced to begin blocking Canadian visitors.

Now it seems that the CRIA has successfully pressured Demonoid's ISP

into discontinuing its rental of servers to the very popular BitTorrent

tracker site.

A message on the site now reads:

The CRIA threatened the company renting the servers to us, and

because of this it is not possible to keep the site online. Sorry for

the inconvenience and thanks for your understanding.

Apparently blocking Canadian visitors was not enough. But, shouldn't

it be legal in Canada if it technically complies with Canadian

copyright laws? As usual the CRIA doesn't seem to care and Demonoid

will no doubt be forced to pack up and move elsewhere once again. Maybe

Sweden will be its next stop.

What's interesting to also note is that the CRIA has been reduced to

little more than a front for foreign music interests. After the much publicized departure

of virtually all canadian music labels last year following a dispute

over radio content rules and grant programs for emerging artists, it

became truly apparent to all that the "C" in the CRIA means anything

but Canadian these days and should instead read "Cartel" to accurately

describe its desire to control the supply and demand of all things

music. At the very least it ought to drop the "C" and add an "A," for

all it is is a foreign subsidiary of the RIAA.

Yet, despite all this the CRIA is allowed to throw its weight around

in Canada and to pressure ISPs to shut down sites even if they seem to

comply with Canadian laws. So much for national sovereignty and net

neutrality.

The move also goes against the results of a study funded by the CANADIAN GOVT no less that concluded that P2P and file-sharing services actually increase physical CD sales. The Impact of Music Downloads and P2P File-Sharing on the Purchase of Music: A Study For Industry Canada,

a a newly commissioned study by Industry Canada, a ministry of the

federal government, includes some of the most extensive surveying to

date on the music purchasing habits of the Canadian population.

Conducted by Birgitte Andersen and Marion Frenz of the Department of

Management at the University of London in England, the study concludes

that illegal file-sharing does not cause a decrease in music sales as

the music industry has insisted all along. In fact, it does just the

opposite, in that it apparently tends to actually INCREASE music

purchasing.

"Our review of existing econometric studies suggests that P2P file-sharing tends to decrease music purchasing," says the study. "However, we find the opposite, namely that P2P file-sharing tends to increase rather than decrease music purchasing."

Apparently the results of the survey are irrelevant to the CRIA who

still seem to be suffering from the delusion that each illegal music

download represents a lost physical sale. It's reminiscent of what the

what the general manager of the Australian music industry's anti-piracy

unit, Music Industry Piracy Investigations (MIPI), said recently

in that "It's not rocket science to work out that if you get your music

for free, why would you go out and buy it." But, it only proves that it

understands file-sharing about as much as they understand rocket

science.

It's not as rare an occurrence as the music industry might think for

file-sharers to go out and actually buy a physical album they have

already downloaded for free online. Why? It's called supporting the

artist for one, but also to make sure they have a high-quality version

to listen to. Not every music file available online is encoded at

320kbps or in .FLAC format. The norm is usually 192kbps, and if you

really dig the album it probably won't cut it when you try to crank it

up on your home theater system.

Plus, not every artist is available online or would be something you

would normally be exposed too. Being that I live in the United States

it's not like I get to hear about new artists in other countries. P2P

allows me to grab a track or an album and get more involved in the UK

music scene for example. It also gives me a reason to go out and see

bands from there when they pass through town. How does this not benefit

the music industry?

Do they really want music to remain a dumbed down industry where it

consists of radio, MTV's TRL, and Wal-Mart? Judging by the pressure

it's placed on Demonoid's ISP I think we all know the answer to this

one.

 
Back
Top