A single poll from 14 months ago. Like I said, on average over 4 years she has been around the average mark, not mean, but average, middle of the pack to slightly on the low end. To read the article, it states that this poll is mostly a mirror of how respondents feel about the president and not the vp. It also only looks at 1000 people. If you look at polls you can find ones that give Bush Sr. (As vp) an approval of 27-30% on any given month and 50%+ less than 6 months later.
I think the more interesting stat is the disapproval rating as it has gone up significantly in the last 15 years or so for all candidates. Is this due to polarizing politics or a decrease in quality of life or what? That's the problem with quantitative data, we will never know the motivations behind any of it, just speculation.
I will admit that it is a low approval%. I think focusing on things like polls to base opinion and arguments off of are kind of weak and very team sporty.
I think you'd make a stronger argument if you stated policy you don't like and people would respect you and your opinions more if you admitted when you were wrong (like with the racist thing) instead of ignoring it.
As an example, there are a few months where, when in office, trump had an approval of 35% and a disapproval of 60%, (gallop polls) that is a 25 point difference to harris' "record breaking" 17 point difference. We can cherry pick all day but what's the point?
