DEA forgets student in cell he has to drink his own piss and do meth to stay alive

Well first to the OP this fact is that there are arguments both ways and drug use still went up and deaths are about the same so its not exactly a magic solution. Its not legal in Portugal anyways its just decriminalized so there is still tons of money going to cartels and drug orginizations. Drug prices went down more then likely because it was easier to sell the drugs in that enviroment. Also in Canada we have safe injection sites and what not already I see no problem with this.

But if you think that being able to go to the corner store and buy meth wont increase its use your absolutely fucking braindead. People will be way more likely to expereiment when there is no legal consequences and it is viewed as "safe". If you can buy meth then as soon as you do you should be forfiting your right to be a parent, drive cars or basically live on this planet. Why should a country profit from killing people and turning people into raging drug addicts. I merely posted that article to show that with decriminilzation very little changes and drug use went up so If it were fully legal it would probably get out of hand. Go bang a rusty needle in ur temple
 


  • Reported lifetime use of illicit drugs increased from 7.8% to 12%, lifetime use of cannabis increased from 7.6% to 11.7%, cocaine from 0.9% to 1.9%, ecstasy from 0.7% to 1.3%, and heroin from 0.7% to 1.1%
 
i guess safe injection sites are the same a corner stores?! legalization does not equate to drugs for everyone. the government would assume control over the distribution (especially over the hardcore shit), so they know who's getting it and how much. either way, legal = no criminal charge and not let's all do drugs and sing kumbaya. one more thing, so in your opinion, the drug cartels should profit and not the government? the people that are there to serve (poor word choice on my part) you shouldn't profit/assist, but the slime of the earth can and should? yeah, ok.
 
decriminalization=/=legal

Legalizing meth would be putting it on par with alcohol meaning that anyone can go to a liquor store and buy themselves a crack rock spoon and a syringe. If it is that easy to get drugs then use will go up. Decriminalization has very little affect on drug dealers because it is still illegal to sell the product so there is still a black market and if use goes up then actually they are making more money. As far as using drugs for medical treatment to get people off hard drugs there is already methadone and another chem I forget exactly how to spell. How are they going to control who gets the hardcore shit, what you got to pass a test or something prove you can handle it. Like that just makes no sense its either got to be a medical perscription which is already stated above or anyone over 18.
 
wow. i actually feel sorry for you, you are a total mong. i'll do this one last time, if you still don't get it then it's you who should be checking yourself in.

Well first to the OP this fact is that there are arguments both ways

and drug use still went up and deaths are about the same so its not

exactly a magic solution.

drug use did not go up, REPORTED drug use went up (and only every so slightly) it's not the same thing. that's like saying there's more gays in new york now because gay marriage has been legalized and more are getting married. deaths did not go up, do you not know what the word REDUCTION means? think of it this way: we fish twice as much and have better fishing techniques but we catch less fish, that means they went DOWN.

Its not legal in Portugal anyways its just

decriminalized so there is still tons of money going to cartels and drug

orginizations. Drug prices went down more then likely because it was

easier to sell the drugs in that enviroment.

yes this is a problem that perpetuates violence, what is your point? money from drug sales could and should be going back to taxpayers. don't quote me on this but the war on drugs has cost over 1 trillion dollars to the US alone since it began and it's basically made things worse.

But if you think that being able to go to the corner store and buy

meth wont increase its use your absolutely fucking braindead.

if you think that's how drugs will be sold and regulated then YOU are fucking braindead. i don't even what is this. drugs will be HARDER to get if legalized.

People

will be way more likely to expereiment when there is no legal

consequences and it is viewed as "safe".

again, drug use in portugal at worst remained stable, in the netherlands it went down. being legal does not mean it will be considered safe (seriously think about what you just said). govs will focus their efforts on EDUCATION instead of wild goose chase incarcerations. drugs = social/health problems not criminal.

If you can buy meth then as

soon as you do you should be forfiting your right to be a parent, drive

cars or basically live on this planet.

why? i'm not defending meth but surely it can be used responsibly (aka not hurting others). look at alcohol, it's extremely dangerous considering how accessible it is, what it does to you and how it can be used jointly with cars, firearms/weapons, machinery, etc. but we've EDUCATED people not to do these tings. i don't want to get in a pissing contest about which drug is worse than the other, i'm not knowledgeable enough but it's completely irrelevant.

Why should a country profit from

killing people and turning people into raging drug addicts.

i'm only highlighting this cause it's so dumb.

I merely

posted that article to show that with decriminilzation very little

changes and drug use went up so If it were fully legal it would probably

get out of hand.



READ, we've already been through this.

You're 12, really dumb and you'll come back to this in a few years and realize it.

 
Again there is no strong evidence supporting drug use went down the only facts are that drug use went up sure people might have been more likely to say they used but basically theres nothing proving it went down. Second The death rate went down the first few years but has now come back up to what it was pre decriminalization. Third how are they going to determine who gets to use heroin and how will the regulate it. If you belive that a regular meth user deserves to raise children I feel very sorry for your children.

Drugs will be harder to get if legalized. Look at how many kids abuse perscription painkillers these days its a fucking epidemic, If hard drugs are highly regulated and only some people can get them THERE WILL STILL BE A BLACK MARKET and then people will just be selling there own perscriptions plus there will still be all the shady stuff thats out there now. The only way to fully cut off the cartels is to fully legalize and let anyone who is of age buy whatever they want. If they arn't aloud to buy it legally they will just go and get it the same way they are now. Sorry if that isn't typed perfectly I am exhausted but can't sleep because I have a cold
 
I guess what I'm trying to convey is that if these drugs are legalized then you are just making them easily accessible to anyone who wants to try them. Sure you could go out and do meth but if you get caught, you go to jail. What are the repercussions if one is caught using meth in a world where it's legal? Nothing.

I guess my concern is this. Sure, plenty of people wouldn't do these drugs because they are educated enough to know they are bad news. But in society there are plenty of retards that do stupid things. It is my belief that if legalized, drug use would rise.

Plus you are basing your argument of a fact that isn't entirely accurate. I believe reported drug use actually did rise from this decriminalization. Reported. Think about how many people do cocaine and get away with it (aka not reported). The fact is most incidents of drug use remain under the radar. I'm not bashing your point, it's completely valid, I'm just saying it's not entirely the truth.
 
ehhh, gonna have to call you on that one. If you're not wearing a seatbelt, you can move around in a crashing car, and be harmful to the other people in the car, even if they are wearing seatbelts, or be flung from the car, and harm people even outside your own vehicle.

That said, there can be indirect effects from drug use other than just some junkie getting high. If a dude fucked on meth gets into a car and decides to go mach 10 in his mom's suburban neighborhood, and kills a group of children, do you think the meth played a role?
 
Drugs are already easily accessible to people who want to try them, and if the fact that meth will melt away your gums is not enough to keep someone from doing it, a little jail time isn't going to stop them either. We should put the effort we put into locking people up into education about drugs and treatment for addicts.
 
Who knows what's best for me? The government? or myself? That's what it boils down to, stop trying to dictate peoples lives.
 
......go look up how much the DEA get from busting drug dealers and taking there huge estates cares and drug money.....not a dime of that will be from the tax-payers
 
I read on a dif website that he found a white powder on the ground and ate it to try to stay alive. I guess that shoulda been mentioned
 
I would imagine he would get pretty much whatever he asks for. They have to make a deal, they don't want this to be any bigger a deal than it already is.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top