Damn! Is there anybody who skied the Dynastar Nobis Inspired or Dynastar Intuitiv BIG???!!!

duboix

Member
I need your opinions about these skis!

I mean not BIG ProRider 194 / Super Nobis 194, but regular Intuitiv BIG / Nobis Inspired.

How do these skis feel in crud / bumps / grooms? I found them too soft when bending with my arms, isn't it a problem on high speed? What about vibrations in crud at hign speed? What about binding setup with the shorter tip and longer tail for high speed freeriding?

 
I ski the 188 Inspired. The ski rips!! I have skied it on ice, crud, bumps, and 2 ft of fresh. Definately an awesome do it all ski.

 
hmmm... LBF... you know, man, 178 is it's longest size... i'm about 175 myself, so 178 will be too short for high speed freeriding... i will have to hold them hard, instead of releasing and letting them ride and sing... LBF should be good on forest lines, especially, in thick forest... but man, i need the one and only pair for mtn (i've got one for park)... i'm thinkin of Intuitiv BIG 188...

this season i skied for more than a week Dynastar Arno Adam Pro 188, the one with flowers and chameleon graphix... nice... but i'd like to have more wide tool... there is a choice: Intuitiv BIG (Inspired) or AK Launcher, both 188...

 
why only pow? pow is not an every day option... most of the time you have to ski crud... unless you are damn lucky... and the thing is that ski should be very stiff (at least its tip) to cut all the crud, absorb the vibrations and not letting them to fuck your leggs... and that is why i have some doubts about Dynastar Nobis Inspired (BIG) - they are soft... while AK Launcher is stiff and rips anything... and the stiffest fat ski i've ever seen is the Head Monster i85... i skied it for a day and a half... stiff as hell and such a stable... also carves nice - only about 22m radius with 186cm length...

but damn, i love Dynastar and also... Intuitiv BIG graphix is nice (one with the blue dragon) while the AK Launcher's one is completely gay for me... :)

 
man, if to consider the same size, like 178, LBF is almost the same as Nobis or BIG... yeah, you have a couple of milimeters less in waist on LBF, but fuck, it is not a big deal... also LBF has a narrower tail, as dynastar guys say 'to make the ski more forgiving', but fuck, wider tail makes you carve better... as for the stiffness - these skis are the same...

and i repeat, 178 (max length of LBFs) with almost center-mounted bindings is not for high speed, i guess...

but... if i wouldn't already have my 'supafly' now and would have to choose THE ONE AND ONLY pair of ski for everywhere, including park and mountains - i would buy the Little Big Fats, definetely!

 
I own the inspireds! They are way good skis and i love them! They are so dang fast in pow! And they are pretty good for park but maybe a little too heavy!

 
If you don' need dynastar and want a stiff pow ski get Armada ARVs. I just got a pair and they rip in pow and crud and ice and park.

If you want dynastar then get the Legend 8800.

your it

you were born free and free you shall remain

 
get madtrix mojos, the tip and tail are as fat as the monster 105, but the waist is skinner, they are a very stiff twin

 
the new legend pros OWN ALL!! although they retail for 1200 dollars. but they are race stock. which basically means they are amazing.

there's a reason its called snowboarding......it's snowing!!!

-dumbass xgames anouncer
 
Nobis is stiffer than LBF but LBF is torsionally stiff while flexy enough for feel. Get the LBF 178 is just barely long enough and these are NOT SLOW they are incredibly stable at high speeds, eats crud for lunch but loves powder. I could not ride the nobis switch, no feel like riding 2x4s.

'3030'
 
Nobis is stiffer than LBF but LBF is torsionally stiff while flexy enough for feel. Get the LBF 178 is just barely long enough and these are NOT SLOW they are incredibly stable at high speeds, eats crud for lunch but loves powder. I could not ride the nobis switch, no feel like riding 2x4s.

'3030'
 
Back
Top