Cork 1 now possible

1. Pussy is wonderful, but you're a troll and troll pussy is eww.

2. Don't watch the X-games. Problem solved.
 
chatroulette-trolling-butthurt-much.jpg


you should probably give them a call
 
If you consider that a cork 180, then a cork 180 has been possible since at least 2005.

Not saying that this isn't sick, just by no means new.
 
I agree with most of the shit you said but for a cork to be cork it's not inverted. That video you posted was perfect cork 9 and his feet didn't go over his head just really close
 
totally wasn't cork

Other people can do them

pisses me off that now everything thats slightly off axis is called a "cork" even if its a fucking bio
 
Because Laruent Favre never existed... and Jwoods, I want you to suck my pussy. That's a good thing, a very good thing.
 
If you knew how many of the guys you look up to in skiing that would completely disagree/insult you with what you're posting, you'd probably kill yourself from the embarrassment.
 
sounds like we need.... AN ORANGE NAME.But by the way your responding with your ignorant views on what a cork is and the people on this webiste i have came to the conclusion i hate you.

BUTT if your a troll your god
 
invert =/= feet always directly over head

invert = feet at greater height than head

rodeo = inverted back with feet going directly over

cork = inverted back with feet not going directly over head

that wasnt corked

the same way a rectangle isnt necessarily a square, but can be

rails were also meh. 2/10. would not bang.
 
alright everybody, i wasn't aware that cork 1's had really been done before so regardless of if this truly was a cork 1 or not, i apologize for the poor thread
 
I think the 25 people that already posted about b dog in eye trip and at euro x probably have some idea.
 
THIS WAS DONE IN 2008 SO YEAHhttps://www.newschoolers.com/membervideo/346417.0/Cork-180--its-possible?s=68065&c=0&t=2&o=8

 
the edit was pretty sweet. but honestly the cork 1 was the least impressive looking trick in the whole thing
 
This is the strongest proof all day! If a legit cork 3 from directly above kind of looks similar to a 180 shot from below then that 180 MUST be corked as well! So if I took a shot of Steve Stept doing a corked 3 from the same perspective as that 180, then they'll look kind of similar still! Further proof!

ES-steve-3seq-big.jpg


Oh uh... well look at that, they're completely different.

At least this thread wasn't a total loss. At least we can all enjoy a couple of shots of LEGIT corked 3s.
 
This is the strongest proof all day! If a legit cork 3 from directly above kind of looks similar to a 180 shot from below then that 180 MUST be corked as well! So if I took a shot of Steve Stept doing a corked 3 from the same perspective as that 180, then they'll look kind of similar still! Further proof!

ES-steve-3seq-big.jpg


Oh uh... well look at that, they're completely different.

At least this thread wasn't a total loss. At least we can all enjoy a couple of shots of LEGIT corked 3s.
 
why does everyone always bitch about shit, just shut the fuck up, watch the video or whatever, post something useful and move on, no reason to fuck up other peoples days, not like it would anyway.

Bdog has been hucking cork 1's since 2009
 
That may very well be a cork 180, but I'm sure MANY skiers have done that very same thing by accident. (ie. get owned in compression, totally loose control, but somehow still brings it back and barely lands.)

I'm curious if he did the cork 1 on purpose or whether it was a loss of control that turned epic, kinda like the weird air pretzel Pep did at JOI years back when he screwed up zero spin or something.
 
Nah that rolling down the windows through the whole air was completely on purpose, or else he would have done the same thing again but without looking like an idiot.

Let's see how many people don't catch the sarcasm on this one...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top