enick, I disagree with you on that situation as well. They responded to a possible burglary. That's just neighbors either: 1. looking out for each other, or 2. being nosey little bastards. It doesn't matter what call they respond to... If they see a crime, they have to deal with it as trained. For example: I've done, and still do, numerous ambulance shifts. We get calls all the time for things like seizure, shortness of breath, etc. Say you called the cops because you got shot in the chest and were bleeding profusely, but the call came through to us as shortness of breath/wheezing because that's how the people at the switchboard heard you and couldn't make out what you were trying to say. Well, that would be a code yellow call. We'd get there, and you'd be close to death, having lost say four liters of blood from your femoral artery. Just because the actual incident wasn't the same as the call we got, does that give us justification not to treat you/deal with it? NO. That'd be stupid. Similar thing in this case. There was still a crime going on, so they still have to do their jobs.
They were smoking pot, so I could see where they got arrested (although, as previously stated, I disagree with the government's way of dealing with victimless 'crimes').
About the car thing, I took my parents' car once when I wasn't supposed to. They reported it as stolen, even though they knew it was I who took it, but they found me before the cops did, and I convinced my mom to drop the report. If the title is under someone else's name (even parents), the car can be suspected of being stolen, especially with another 'suspicios act' taking place.
-Sdot Odot
'haha it got deleted i guess that not tolerated unless your name is stef. lol oh i just noticed freezy is logged in no wonder' -lj5
