Thanks for that worddoc man, interestingI agree, it is a two sided battle. I think that when the FDA says that it is dangerous for consumption, I think they are right to say that. It'd be infeasible to market raw milk on an industrial scale, because the more industrialized farming becomes, quantity supersedes quality and cleanliness. However on a small, localized scale, with farms of only a couple dozen cows that you know and see every day, it seems like a good way to do business. The farmer I get my milk from I know personally, I've been in his barn and its very clean. None of his cows are sick, because they are allowed to graze openly, and are a pretty pure line of well kept animals. I feel safe drinking their milk. And think, until 1886, no one had even thought of adulterating milk in any way shape or form! There was only raw milk. And most people did just fine, with a good many of exceptions. When you eat anything though, you take a risk. I think its time to step out of the nuclear bunker of suburbia and out to the country for a little bit of real, unprocessed, fresh food. BUT, we do live in different times, and not everyone has a herd of cows directly across the road from them (like me). So yeah, raw milk isn't for everyone.
Ideologies and scientific opinions aside, raw milk is DELICIOUS. Oh my god, it is so rich and creamy, you really can't beat it. And its much easier to make butter and yogurt with raw milk! (and in making yogurt, you heat the milk up quite a bit, so its sort of pasteurized! haha). Raw makes what you know as whole milk seem as thin and watery as skim.
I hate skim milk with a passion.