Chronics or Walls

BNik

BNik

Member
Yo ive been looking at these skis for a while and stil cant make the choice. I ride park mostly (midwest kid) but i wanna ski that can handle more than park. Just wondering on what ski would be better for park or if they are to stiff to jib some threads have had read it seems like people say that bolth skis are to stiff thanks. idk if you need it but im 5'8 about 145 pounds. Thanks
 
the walls are dope, had them 1 year ago but sold them, from the money i bought new armada ar6 but i regret having sold the walls. they are awesome, hold a good edge, due to their stiffness you can really charge on them and dont have to worry. as i skied them i was 6" and had them in 178 i think, but i would be happier if id have took them in 185.

havent skid the chronics yet, but id go for the walls, you want a symetrical ski for park.

guess that both skis are good and you cant go wrong with either, so just demo them or go for which ever top sheet you like better.

peace
 
if the majority of your time is out of the park, then chronics

if the majority of your time is in the park, then walls
 
Both are stiffer skis, with great construction! Midwest wise, the walls may be a bit better as they are symetrical, as for all mtn, I would say that they are both going to ski very similarly.
 
I love line, I love chronics, they are awesome, I think you would be happy with them.
But then theres the walls (haven't ridden any), which I think would be the better choice from what i've heard from people
 
creative joke man, really cool

its just a suggestion, its in the exact same category as the walls and chronics, symmetrical and stiff, plus is double as a really good all mountain ski as well, and i can vouch for that. and i can give him a sick price on a pair
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top