Chris Dorner, LAPD killer

This was on the same page next to the livestream.

How do i explain this to my boss?

mike-shouhed-playgirl-shoot-23.jpg

 
I want to support this guy, but I know there's some many other ways he could've gone about this. I might be wrong, but he did kill corrupted officers, correct?
 
I should make this better but I got shit to do so be generous and make the jumps i neglected to explain

They are guilty by association, just because you don't pull the trigger doesn't mean you aren't responsible for not stopping a murder. It's just a strange way to motivate them into positive action.

I think he's lost himself, but I don't think he is entirely wrong. At this point picking one side and not explaining yourself makes you look like an idiot.

I don't think cops should be allowed to gun down criminals because criminals have the right to defend themselves. Corruption of the LAPD implies that they are guilty, hence no trial is required. They are all guilty of knowing and doing nothing, they are all guilty of being afraid and causing fear, and if they don't want to be a part of it anymore they should quit.

That being said I think it's impossible to end the corruption because it is part of the city, not to mention the country.
 
So a person I know, knows one of the ladies that the truck was stolen from. He did not tie them up or anything. He said, "Get out of the car, I don't want to hurt you." She got out and she said "Can I get my dog out?" He said, "Yes, hurry up."

Also, CHP is being real assholes to a lot of people. My dad called trying to get information about if he could get up the mountain because my mom is bed ridden. He just got sarcastic responses from this clown. Another CHP guy cussed out a reporter on live TV.
 
are you talking about the one officer who said "get the fuck out of here" as they were exchanging gun fire? if I was that officer i would have said even worse things.
 
I don't even see logic in half of what you posted. Cops shouldn't have the right to gun down criminals? explain that one.
 
I was told the reporter was just asking questions to an officer away from that incident. Maybe thats what it was though. Hard to get the truth about things when you're getting information from what some kid at my school saw on the news while we were in lockdown.
 
I am by no means one of those "fuck the police kids", but do you honestly think cops should be able to shoot someone breaking the law if they are not fired upon first? Do you not think the right to a fair trial should be a part of our constitution? Despite the corruption and shit show that the LAPD is, I feel bad for them and don't want to see them get killed, but if this event leads to a cleaning up of the department, then at least dorner has done something. Too bad he couldn't do it without killing people though.
 
That's because there's really no logical way to defend what he's doing. Obviously corruption is a problem, but it's pretty clear that this guy has snapped and is in a bizarre state of mind.
 
Cops can't just shoot someone breaking the law. They, their fellow officers, or the public have to be in imminent danger with a deadly weapon to justify deadly force. They can't even shoot fleeing Felons anymore because of Tenessee vs garner
 
Yeah, exactly, I think what the guy above was saying was that the "criminals" should be able to defend themselves against the corrupt police department.

Besides that, it looks like he probably killed 2 sheriffs deputies, super lame to go after regular cops not just those that wronged him.
 
where did you hear that? Because no matter how fucked it is what he is doing he could have just become the most badass person of all time. Riding out of a house on fire with a fucking horse? lol wut
 
In the future, police departments should just use predator drones to bomb people out when they barricade after killing a bunch of people.
 
wouldn't it make since for him to set the house on fire right before he got out to hold the police there? I almost feel like this isn't quite over
 
Back
Top