not usually enough for shooting good sequences... 4+ is really what you need. 5 is optimal. alot of people think the more frames per second the better the sequence but above like 6.5 the shots are too close together and it just looks dumb. if you want to shoot sequences get yourself a EOS 50D with a fast lens but be prepared to shell out at least twice the scrilla than a digital rebel.
Higher FPS doesn't put the shots too close together for a sequence. That's ridiculous. You don't even have to put them all in the sequence. What are you talking about?
that's what this site if for asking questions to people who know what they are talking about and who are into the same stuff. if it's too much for you then maybe you should get the fuck out of here
...my point is you don;t have to have a super fast FPS rate...but preferable the best rate is around 5..although the ones at 6.5 fps are just a pain because there are so many frames
hey pip how do you put your sequences together in photoshop, just crop each frame super small and layer them? or do you use that program in lightroom that i can't remember the name of?
they look pretty good and seamless but they are small so i cant be too sure
Check out the blogs on the front page and look for Dan Carr's, and then look through them for a video on it, thats one of the easiest ways to do it, mine is a bit different but if you follow his instructions, you will no doubt have success.