Canon DLSR help

Keyjibbs

Keyjibbs

Active member
Alright guys I'm looking to get back into photography as a hobby for my downtime. For background info, I used to shoot on a Rebel 35mm camera for awhile and did the whole film thing for awhile. Then I used a Rebel XT DLSR after film for a few months. I've taken some classes on photography which is where I used both film and digital cameras. So now my problem is I don't know what camera to get now. My budget is around $1000. The first two choices I've had are

Used Canon 30D for $390

Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Lens-$280

Canon 50mm F/1.8-$100

maybe another lens or a flash

plus cards and external hard drive so about another $100

or

Used Canon 40D-$625

Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Lens-$280

and maybe the 50mm f/1.8

plus cards and hard drive.

Are either of these good choices? I'm just not sure if I should spend the extra cash on a better body or go with a cheaper body and get more lenses and accessories.

Thanks for any response.

 
get the 50 for sure, and try to find a fixed aperture lens (not fixed, but you can use the same aperatures at all focal lengths) if you can. its worth the extra money in my opinion.
not too sure about canon bodies, but i have a friend with the 40D and he loves it. Since you have a background in photography, i would say to spring for the nicer body if you plan on using it alot. that way you wont find yourself regretting not getting it. also, think about this: if you keep the camera for 3 years, another 100 or so bucks is an insignificant amount of money
 
40D is a huge upgrade from the 30D but that's not to say they're both great cameras. think about how intensive you wanna be and how far you plan on taking photography. for occasional hobby shots go for the 30d but if you really wanna get into it go for the 40d. i love my 40d, i went with it over the 30 just because it has more bang for the buck imo
 
watch the bh used store online, they will often get a 40d 17-85 kit on there for around 800-900 in great shape then since you just took a step backwards buying an ef-s lens, take the money you have left and start saving for an L series
or a great option would be get that cheap used 30d you found, then watch the bh used store for a 70-200 f4L USM, they come on there for ~500 sometimes less in great shape, and with the 150 or so left get yourself a 50 1.8, then just learn to shoot telephoto, and save for a wide angle lens
 
Thanks for all the responses so far. I'm still kind of torn between the two bodies right now. I just don't know if saving the $200 on the 30D is worth it or not. I would love an L series lens so I might take that road but I would love to hear some more pros and cons of each.
 
ef-s lenses- no worky on full frame or 1.3 crop which might deturr you from the 17 shot but it is one of the best ef-s lenses made. L glass is incredibly sharp, dependable and very rugged not to mention it screams i know something more about this camera than what it cost my parents when they bought it for me for christmas30D- great body, decent screen and frame/sec. rate not many megapixels but still a good body and a bargain for 3whatever you found it for40D- terrific body for the money, extremely fast, big screen, enough megapixels to blow things up pretty huge if that's your thing but glass is more important than bodys or megapixels.
 
to put it this way, at some point in your photography experience you will most likely own an L lens. what most people do is think they don't need one, then get bad lenses and just keep upgrading until they have an L lens, it's sort of inevitable hehe. that being said, you don't need to rush into L fever if you don't have the money. lenses such as the 17-55 or tamron 17-50 are super sharp and great all around lenses. if you're focused on a purely economized quiver then i would recommend 40D (i will always recommend that body over the 30D, worth the extra cash) and then a 17-50 and a 50mm 1.8. if you buy used from the right places that can run about 1000 bucks
either way, glass is always more important than body but if you get a rebel xs it will limit you to a certain extent. the 40D is capable of shooting anywhere from beginning amateur to full time pro photography so it comes with the range of a massive learning curve. the same can be said for the 30D but as you get more advanced you'll notice the extra features of the 30D. so if you get a good body it will work as far as you want it to go into your photo career until you decide to go full frame (which i'm convinced everyone will end up doing)
here're some lenses i highly recommend with price in mind:70-200 f/4 L-i got mine for 425canon 50mm f/1.8-runs about 65 usedtamron 17-50 f/2.8- super sharp and fast, runs about 300-350sigma 10-20- 400 ish, or canon 10-22 - 600 ish (wide angles are some of the most fun)
then if you wanna drop more money look into some other L lenses
 
When I was shopping for my camera, I waited for a new model to be released so it would drop the price point on the now "lower end" model. I waited for the release of the 1d mkIII to come out before scooping up my mkIIn $1000 cheaper than what it had been a week previously.

That said, I'm probably not going to be patient enough for the 5d mkIII, I'm placing my order for the new 5d soon.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top