Canon 200mm 2.8, or is it a better option?

Belzebub

Belzebub

Member
I am in the marked for a tele lens and the canon 200mm 2.8 looked like a good option for a good price. I will use it for sports, wildlife, alittle macro and some portraits. 97% photo.Since it being a prime, i am a little worried about the flexibility. I will probably buy some extention tubes for macro and some teleconverters for wildlife. Have anybody on here tried it? Is there a better option?
 
Canon 70-200, worth saving for whatever model you were looking at.

or a 200 2.0L IS
 
dont be scared off by a prime. i much prefer them, they'll make you a stronger photographer in the end. zooms just let you get lazy. my freshman photo professor always said the 3 most important words in photography are MOVE YOUR ASS.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top