Candide 1.0 vs Volkl Wall vs HG Stinger

G

G_B

Member
Hi,

I am going to purchase either the stinger, wall or candide 1.0 from the 2015 line (the white one). I will use these only for park. I currently ski on filthy riches but after skiing on skis like the candide 2.0 realized that I'm not a huge fan of the profile on the filthy rich. I am 5'11 150lbs. I really liked the candide 2.0 but wanted something quicker. The main things I'm interested in are the durability of the hg vs durability of walls vs the durability of the candide 1.0, whether the difference in dimensions of the wall and candide will make a difference or not, flex, and how easy they are to spin on. Also I have Salomon NFX as well so im looking for something different than those

Wall dimensions: 115,87,115

Candide 1.0 dimensions: 121,90,121

HG stinger: 125,96,125

Thanks and +k for help
 
Alright wall seems similar to the nfx so it's down to faction vs hg. Any help is greatly appreciated
 
1.0 is rockered unlike stinger that is a full camber ski.

Stingers got thicker edges than 1.0 so better durability.

Stingers are wider than 1.0

Im not really sure about the flex about these skis but i belive that 1.0 is medium flexy ski.

If you want wider camber park ski, go with stingers

If you want skinnier rocker-camber-rocker ski, go with 1.0
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top