Caculate your environmentle foot print

CamBrowne

CamBrowne

Active member
its pritty intresting

but i dont want to revile my final score cause im imbarssed by it. but then again alot of the question were probibly worng..
 
Same here :/

i should take a leaf outa my Dad's book...haha he's an eco warrior. windmill to power his house, never flys, grows his own food...

there'd still be snow to ski on in the future if everyone lived like him!

 
Man, I got like 6.6. The average in Canada it says was 8 something. 3.5 planets needed though to live like me.
 
puufhc i did eveyrhting at the minimum, lieik most environmentally freindly and ti still siad we needed 1 planet for eveyrone to live liek me, whihc is bullshit, we need less than one because eveyrone lives better than what i put in to that thing.  They could maybe have some more cramped housing cuz i bet there are poepel who live more than 7 persons in less than 50 m squared.    anywyas when i did it for real i got 6.2 and we need 3.2 planets for my real lifestyle. 
 
ecofootprintyw6.jpg


jea
 
liek 4.7 planets that sucks.

im sorry i live in a capatalist society and my parents worked hard to live in a big house.

who the hell lives in a house without running water and has access to the internet?
 
i scored 3.4 that seems relatively low compared to you guys but thats probably cause i take a train to school every day back and forth
 




CATEGORY ACRES

FOOD 4.9

MOBILITY 3.5

SHELTER 8.2

GOODS/SERVICES 10.6

TOTAL FOOTPRINT 27



IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.

WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.





IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 6.1 PLANETS.

I drive 300-400 miles a week, that kinda fucked me.
 
i got 122 and yhou would need 27.4 planets to fit all of us if u were all me....

just kidding i got an 18, but i dont know what that comes out to
 
i got a 39, and 8.8 planets. thats because i drive about 400 miles plus a week, that fucked me. this quiz makes me feel terrible.
 
but the obvious solution is to kill all those damn asians and africans, so instead of needing so many planets we just have less people.
 
14 and 3.2 planets. Not having a car really lowers the mobility, as does living in a house with 8 roommates.
 
19 points here, I can't remember the # of planets though, thank god third world countries in Africa only score like .0001 and need like .0000001 planets. Sounds selfish but I love my life. I'm all for recycling and all that and I do it but I need to drive and I like to eat what I eat, I'm not willing to sacrifice what I have, and it would cost me more $$ than I want to spend.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top