Bush sucks major ass!

NO HE DOESN'T......BUSH IS THE FUCKING MAN!!!!

what's everybody's problem with him?

'Anyone got any hot sisters they wanna sell?'

-skipimp_

*Proud Member of the HoBum Posse
 
they all think hes stupid, but i think hes the best president, well if clinton wasnt president, since ford. he is stupid bullheaded and he dosnt care what people say, it might b bad for the country........shit i lost my train of thought

*Proud member of the HoBum Posse
 
did you know that george bush 1 was involved in the assasination of john f kennedy

fuk that
 
bush is firly simple minded... put him in a conversation, an intelligent convrsation, with somebody, like another leader such as someone rom europe or other poitical people in te us, ad he would get his ass riped apart. he doesnt know what he is aling about, not even on this war shit, and the republicans, are, yes, lucky that all that shit happened on 9-11... or else they would be fucked cause they dont have all this secuity shit, war shit, and iraq shit to bring upon us. oh, and overall, the rpublicans are hypocrites. they criticized the democrats and clinton especially so much when they launched missiles at, wow, terrorist camps in afgahistan, they did do some stuff in raq and other places, and they fed the deoms shit. also, when bush was gonna become pres, the clinton admin. warned the fuckin bush people on osama and his big ass group and they didnt act on it untill so muh shit happened, and now if you dont support war, your practically a traitor. that mentallity is so wrong. oooo, an bush wanted 9-11 to become a holiday... patriot day. notin like vomiting ur ass off. if you think that fuckng the economy up more, killing thousands of people, putting fear into millions, an shit like that, and call it patrit day, then you are just plain stupid... i could go on but im not

-Grant

Chicken Wang?
 
Wow, I hope that you don't talk to someone from another country because they might think all americans are illiterate. Please, don't write more....it hurts my eyes trying to read it.

Bush may not be the most intelligent man on the planet, I understand that. However, we don't need an egotistical genius. We need a LEADER. Someone who can surround themselves with experts in their fields for advice and balls to do what's neccessary. He does this, and that is what the president needs to be able to do.

By the way, if the Clinton Administration knew about Bin Laden, why didn't they do something about it? If you have a good answer, I'd like to hear it.

 
I do have an answer. They were launching misiles at camps throughout Afghanistan, but with all the opposition they got, from the republicans, they couldn't continue to do so. That is why when bush became president, cinton and others warned him, specifically, about osama. And because nothing happened, there was enough time to do things such as they did. AND BUSH IS NOT A LEADER. He is perceived that he is, however, especally around here, his actions have not benefited us

-Grant

Chicken Wang?
 
How do you become a leader if you don't do just that? And don't tell me that the media percieves him that way because the media is very liberal, and they would never play up a Republican president.

If you are so gung-ho about taking someone out before something bad happens, why is Bush doing the wrong thing by going after Saddam?

 
yes, the mdia is perceiving it that way... and if they are liberal, then they dont show it. anyway, attacking iraq isnt a bad idea ar all, its necessary, but the approach the bush admin is taking is what i dont like

-Grant

Chicken Wang?
 
bush_monkey.jpg


look at that its pretty funny i dont know how to post pics

 
the media is so liberal it makes me want to vomit. that is why i have resorted to only watching the oreiley factor. o'reiley is rad. he doesnt let suckas come on his show spittin wishy washy libralist nonesense without their facts straight. i love seing people get shot down on his show. on the subject of our president, i just think its nice to have a leader with some backbone, whose not afraid to bust some skulls. and i dont think you can graduate from yale and be a complete idiot... he did go to yale right? or am i thinking of his dad? anyhow, the mans from texas, so leave him alone... hes already paid the price by living there.

 
It's so completely true. he is a less hairy chimp.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

'skogen-chick likes box. Thats hot.'

~Detective

'if you were doing one of them doggystyle and she flexed her butt cheeks, your dick would get ripped off.'

~Alpentalik on the subject of Serena and Venus Williams
 
people dont understand peace doesn't come quitely...and it isnt made quitely. name a time in history when peace was achieved or maintained quitely. to the restards 'quitely' means without intervention of some sort. when i was coming back home from killy this wknd there was a bunch of protesting liberal faggots chanting anti war pound me in the cornhole shit...so i yelled shit to them while my buddy gave them pressed kilbasa. liberal tree hugging queers. and to the people that think bush is the reason we are most likely going to kick the shit out of saddam, are also ill-informed. go hug a tree and make peace signs. you all need to stop being pussys and saying we are all gonna die and innoccent people are going to die if go to war. well guess what if we had chosen peace in past historical events then guess what kiddos...you wouldnt be here.

 
all this peaceful, not violent shit is just that, shit... too political the situation has become, regardless of what people say, hmmm, what the fuck am i sayin

-Grant

Chicken Wang?
 
to ANEWMORNING...i'm with ya bro. the o'factor is the shit. being in an ivy league school i am surrounded by a bunch of liberal butt pluggers. it makes me sick. its so annoying.

 
theres a school in the east, cant remeber the name, they teach the liberal arts... anyway, bush went to yale, more or less as a legacy student, his father went there and became pres and stuff and has power, not only that, they are bloody rich, so yeah, bush didnt do to well, nevertheless, he went there

-Grant

Chicken Wang?
 
not only is BUSH A SWEET PRESIDENT who doesnt cater to liberal cock mungers, but he is also the hottest president we have had.

wgirl0031.jpg'


wgirl0061.jpg'


 
bush is spoiled with his power... how? in texas he alway bitched to get his way, so the texas congress sucked up to him and gave what he want, and hes bitching now hes president, and yes, he is bitching

-Grant

Chicken Wang?
 
now, I never said Bush was stupid. I think he is actually very smart when it comes to knoledg. I, however think He makes a very bad president. Sadam has weapons so we don't attack. He will only use them if we give him good reason to. and what do you think attacking him will do?

North Koria has had weapons for a long time and what have we done? just sat on it. why? because not as many stupid americans know about it. Buch is just trying to please the people of america and has not considered the well being of this country as a whole.

one more thing, Bush didn't want to see Enron go under because he was helping them steal money along with all his other rich bastard Republicans

 
now his attack ould to 'disarm' saddam... ok. now lets say iraq or some other country attacked the US, obviously, the US would retaliate, like this whole 'war on terrorism' shit, ok. now lets say that iraq is attacked, wouldn't they retaliate? Against the US? thats kind of the thing, you attack, you will be attacked, so, yeah

-Grant

Chicken Wang?
 
oh, and the economy sucks ass, especially here in Washington, and yes, bush is to blame, i dont wanna go into why that is, but i will if i need to

-Grant

Chicken Wang?
 
The thread is getting pretty lame. So now attacking Iraq is a bad idea skier_boy26? Above you said it was neccessary. Please make up your mind.

Also, there are other people that have a more direct affect on the economy than the president...Alan Greenspan is the primary player. If you knew anything about economies, this would be crystal clear.

 
I don't know why some people think Bush is so bad. I've asked this before in some other threads; What EXACTLY has Bush done to make you hate him so much? You can't just come on here and say 'bush sucks' or whatever, you need reasonable arguments to support your points. So again i ask you this, What EXACTLY has Bush done to make you hate him so much?

-----------------------

peace--->chris

***Go big or go home**Just Bodagin'***

Proud Member of the Hobum Posse
 
hey skier_boy26...your are totally wrong and obviously illinformed. most people dont realize it, but bush is not to blame for the economy. infact if you had any knowledge of economics what so ever you would have know that the economy started to decline rapidly before clinton even left office. yes it was at the end of his term, but bush wasnt even president yet. plain and simple...you are a retard for stating something like this.

 
skier_boy26....first bush is good and now he is bad? i didnt think someone cause hit each end of the spectrum in just one thread, but i guess you did it.

 
ok... if im wrong im wrong, i drop that then...

but

We should attack Iraq. Not just because of weapons, but because the people are living in an oppresive shit hole with a power hungry, bitch of a dictator. Currently, the UN has signed a new resolution for inspectors, if Bush would let them inspect, that would be great. If not satisfied afterwards, then he could really bring up the issue of an attack, only if such weapons were found or saddam doesnt comply. Quite frankly, I dont give a shit if saddam attacked people in the US or attacked miltary personel, cause thats just how war is, but what i do give a shit about is when they, the Republicans, politicize a war. Locally, before the election, ads were placed as though if you did not vote for all this security shit, then you were evil. And what is so wrong about that is that they said this what not going to be politicized, but it was and continues to be. How does Bush get invloved with this, well, he too was ranting about those who did not vote in favor of an attack. I guess it is best to say that everybody has different opinions, and maybe reps and senators should vote by their people feelings on the situation like a rep is supposed to. wow, that was messed up.

Furthermore, the Reblicans and Bush especially seem so good is because all they are doing is taking security to the extreme. A whole new department for security? Nothing like throwing our rights out the window. As time progresses, the powers will be abused and freedom reduced. There is a balance, too much security=less freedom, that is what they are shooting for. When there is too little security, there is more freedom. But we are starting to cross where it is too much security and less freedom. Nothing in the US is not regulated in some way, and Bush is inclined to make that even more so, with all this shit that will restrict lives like we have never seen.

Kinda bouncing back to the war stuff. It sounds like the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, where false allegations were made to further support a war. This was the start of the Vietnam War, the Vietnamese fired at a ship and threaten more so we must attack, later proven to be a lie. Now the Bush administartion is claiming that, oh, Saddam is trying to aquire nukes... fine print, in 5+years, that hes financing AL Queida?? So the approach of Bush is what is disturbing.

Holy shit im gonna stop now.

-Grant

Chicken Wang?
 
dude... i just wrote it, but i didnt want all the mispellings i get when ijust type it strait into the box thing

-Grant

Chicken Wang?
 
'oh, and the economy sucks ass, especially here in Washington, and yes, bush is to blame, i dont wanna go into why that is, but i will if i need to' says skier boy.

 
yes i said that, yes it sucks ass here... ad bush has only held a one day little summit thing, if you want to call it that, when all he sid was 'the American people are vigilant' wow, then he proposes some stuff on tax cuts, which were innefective the first time... and he has addressed the problem and would appear to being using war to ovvershadow the probalems with the economy

-Grant

Chicken Wang?
 
so skier_boy, you said that you don't 'give a shit if iraq attacks the US'. How could you not care about something like that? If Iraq attacks us, then a whole new and violent might be on the horizon, how could you not care about that.

The way I look at it is this way: If they US makes a premptive (sp?) strike on Iraq, the length of the war will be cut shorter than if the US waits for an Iraqi attack. And, the US's retaliation on Irap would be quite severe, I think. So, to eliminate the enemy swiftly and efficiently, the US should make the first strike.

-----------------------

peace--->chris

***Go big or go home**Just Bodagin'***

Proud Member of the Hobum Posse
 
war has and will be brutal, but it is sometimes the solution. there will be casualties, and there is nothing i can do about, so i dont really care, except that it is almost inevitable that if attacked, that iraq will defend itself, just like the US would. by attack the way that has been suggested, then it would be bad. i for one would not be surprised if saddam attacked the us if it was attacked, and in that case, idoubt bush would look so great

-Grant

Chicken Wang?
 
I highly doubt that the US would let an Iraqi attack happen in the US after we attacked them. The whole reason for a premptive strike is to destroy thier bases and forts to make sure they can't attack in retaliation.

And, after a US attack, the US military would be on the a very high level of alert, making the chances of an Iraqi missile making its way into the US very very slim.

-----------------------

peace--->chris

***Go big or go home**Just Bodagin'***

Proud Member of the Hobum Posse
 
good point, not everything works the way it is planned, then again, there is a lot of stuff the US could do, so i will agree that iraq wouldnt be able to attack

-Grant

Chicken Wang?
 
yeah your right skierboy....just like in the gulfwar...iraq prolly will attack us back. cause they have a really strong military. oh wait nevermind...now i just remembered that our stealth bombers wiped them off the map. and guess what chief...we didnt lose one bird. but hey your right...i hope they dont attack back. and if they did attack back prepare yourselves americans because the attack will mostlikely be a combination of random ak47 gun fire and short/long range missle vs our military.

 
bush is trying to trick people that we need to go to war. the stupid people of the united states who just watch the news and don't research 'why we are going to blow up a country' just think he's right. so he bombs them, kill saadam....people think he's a great president. their it is right their.

if your smart you'll know that their is no reason to go to iraq. war is not the answer for everything, and saadam poses no threat to us right now. just because we don't agree doesn't mean we have to bomb the shit out of iraq.

theres a natural mystic flowing through the air if you listen carefully now you will hear. its the first trumpet calling. might as well be the last. many more will have to suffer many more will have to die dont ask me why. things are not the way they used to be.
 
tru that... ive heard at least 4 reasons from them for attcking and they have no proof to back it up. They claikm there is an emminent threat, which is 5 years. Thats not emminent. Another was when big teeth Rice got on and said that there was some terrorists that may have come from iraq... that was vauge. Saddam was planning an attack, tha argument died off the second it was said... and another was that, Rice said, that saddam was funding some al queida people, which is downright bull shit considering he isnt that kind of person... religously and stuff

Earyier, like a month ago or so, when people like cheny and bush would give speeches, they would phrase a situation more or less like 'we strongly beleive that saddam is trying to aquire nuclear weapons' i dont think beleive is quite the state of mind that world super power leaders should have when posing for a multi billion, high stake, large men, war with another country

-Grant

Chicken Wang?

*Proud Member of the HoBum Posse
 
oooo... lets say the US had a government with a parliment, like UK or Canada. And lets say bush was the prime minister. Bush would get his ass riped apart if that were the case, because parliment asks questions, tough ones. Bush wouldnt be ableto answer them, at least without a teleprompter

-Grant

Chicken Wang?

*Proud Member of the HoBum Posse
 
not true again skierboy....tony blair is dubbya's side kick. they act in tandem and there are tons of political figures in the UK that totally disagree with what he is going. infact top gunner...a prime minister HAS MORE POWER THAN OUR PRESIDENT. your such a dumb ass...its like you are saying stupid stuff on purpose. a parliament doesnt even have a system of checks and balances like we do. man.....

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top