Bush Kerry Bush Kerry

Public_Enemy0255

Public_Enemy0255

Active member
Hey i was just curious on what u all thought about who should be president...John Kerry or George Bush? ......

***********************************************************

I swear i am not a fruit booter!!

I like snow and slurpies~~~
 
they're both not my favorite, but since we obviously have to pick one... i'd pick kerry over bush any fucking day... and all you little rich conservatives on here don't get up my ass on what the good bush has done in iraq because i'm poor and he hasn't done jack to help anyone in THE US his own country

~Ella

Messed knees for life

*skiing isn't a sport, it's a lifestyle*

Ella and Lauren: changing teenaged boys lives since 2001.
 
You could probably find the answer by searching the many other political threads, but George W. Bush really needs to stay in office or another 4 years.

 
you're obviously an idiot. bush is such a fucking dumbass. if you support him, you suck.

---------------------

Good Fun With A Hand Gun.

MiKeE: If Shaun White is hot I hope I'm ugly.

---

hoodratz47: sweet your now black....
 
oh yeah, I'm sure 400 is going to help compared to the billions were spending of taxpayer money for the war.

so yeah, if thats what you like then vote for the 'Education President'

penguinmilk
 
Yall must not understand that we need to fight in Iraq. Saddam supported terrorists, and HAD weapons of mass destruction. He was a very big threat to natioanl security. Bush did the right thing. I support almost every desicion Bush made except a few internal issues.

 
I'd go with Bush. I think Kerry is a little to fake, he snowboards and tries to look cool and goes to concerts, and all that mtv crap. He has yet to pick a running mate too...theres something i just don't like about him.

---------------------------------------------------------

Team Fresh
 
Everything ATL just said was false. No WMDs, no links to Al Qaeda. Sorry, but you are, quite simply, wrong. As for this thread, I'll assume you were being sarcastic. If not... well, let's just say Bush's record speaks for itself, and leave it at that. Different people can interpret that statement differently.

There have been enough threads on this, look for an old one. For example: This one, which is something like 3 pages.

------------

In a haze

A stormy haze

I’ll be around

I’ll be loving you

Always

Always

Here I am

And I’ll take my time

Here I am

And I’ll wait in line

Always

Always...
 
ross perot

4FRNT.

High Society.

Enom Headwear.

Sidewinder Sports.

'skiboarding is too hard for most people. i broke both of my legs and shattered my pelvis just strapping the leashes on.' - mommy
 
^ but between the two... bush...

4FRNT.

High Society.

Enom Headwear.

Sidewinder Sports.

'skiboarding is too hard for most people. i broke both of my legs and shattered my pelvis just strapping the leashes on.' - mommy
 
Yeah ATL what the fuck are you talking about? where are these so called weapons of mass destruction? Don't you think the american press would have had a field day if they'd actually found the weapons they'd been using to scare you into supporting them and stupid ass bush on the whole for years? Stop living in fear and think for yourself for a few minutes and you'll realize bush is a tool who I'm willing to bet can't even read

'Just once I'd like someone to call me sir without adding, you're making a scene!' - Homer
 
go watch fahrenheit 9/11... it'll blow you away. between the two, kerry, even though he snowboards. As is says in the stalls of countless colorado mountain town bathrooms, 'If god had wanted texans to ski he would have made bullshit white'

weekdays are for healing your back and neck after hucking hard on the weekend
 
the movie only shows one side of the story lets not forget that

__________________

good thing i got my trusty cougar call
 
^Coming from a man with a Bill O'Reilly icon?!?

------------

In a haze

A stormy haze

I’ll be around

I’ll be loving you

Always

Always

Here I am

And I’ll take my time

Here I am

And I’ll wait in line

Always

Always...
 
ugh atleast o'rielly lets other people say what they think on his show

__________________

good thing i got my trusty cougar call
 
HAHAHAHA... yeah, sure. Except for cutting them off before they can answer his questions, bobarding them with loud commentary, and turning their microphones off. Bill O'Reilly is comedic... and, as Maddox puts it (in his characteristically subtle fashion), 'a big, blubbering vagina'.

------------

In a haze

A stormy haze

I’ll be around

I’ll be loving you

Always

Always

Here I am

And I’ll take my time

Here I am

And I’ll wait in line

Always

Always...
 
he does that when they start getting off topic andstart trying to 'spin' tye facts

__________________

good thing i got my trusty cougar call
 
Wow, I can't believe someone actually believes that. Noone outside of Fox news cuts off thir guests when they're trying to speak their minds. HE decides what's 'off topic', HE decides when facts are being spun... it's a miniature totalitarian state on cable TV! 'Spin' the facts, my ass... but hey, since you watch him so much, why not have a game of O'Reilly Factor Bingo next time? Here's your game card.

billbingo9.gif


------------

In a haze

A stormy haze

I’ll be around

I’ll be loving you

Always

Always

Here I am

And I’ll take my time

Here I am

And I’ll wait in line

Always

Always...
 
Michael Moore has documented sources for everything I've seen him say. He's no less biased, but his biased portrayal of events are based in fact. Meanwhile, he's also not half the blunt instrument O'Reilly is, and considering what he did to Heston, that's saying a lot... O'Reilly is comedy, and I appreciate him for it. But Actually taking him seriously is a bit absurd... in short, Michael Moore should be taken with a grain of salt and unspun. Bill O'Reilly should be laughed at with abandon. He really is funny.

------------

In a haze

A stormy haze

I’ll be around

I’ll be loving you

Always

Always

Here I am

And I’ll take my time

Here I am

And I’ll wait in line

Always

Always...
 
i like bush..and i like michael moore movies..he really does only show one side of the story though.. When he tries to get opinions from the side he is not on, he skews them to make that person look like an idiot.. I still enjoy his movies though..But for now..im for Bush

-----------------------------------------------------------

MEMBER NUMBER 632

[]D [] []V[] []D
 
(to atl at the top)i refuse to type the same facts over and over and over again. its to much to type. by now you should remember the pages and pages of mistakes and terrible desicions bush has made.

---------------------

Good Fun With A Hand Gun.

MiKeE: If Shaun White is hot I hope I'm ugly.

---

hoodratz47: sweet your now black....
 
i support bush

dont go to new york. all it has to offer is i love ny stickers

member 9020

newbies are our future unless if we stop them now!
 
Here's something for all the people who let Michael Moore think for you. http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/7/1/210557.shtml I can't do links so just copy and paste.

NO wepons of mass destruction? Read this:http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2004-07-02-poland-iraq_x.htm

A rocket shell that was filled with sarin nerve agent was found in Iraq, where terrorists are looking for wepons of mass destruction. Why would the terrorists look for them in Iraq? Simply, because they are there.

Why don't you hear about weapons of mass destruction being found in Iraq? Maybe it's because the media is left wing and dosen't want you to hear about it so they can help get Bush out of the office.

As for the link between Al Queada and Saddam. It's there. Saddam offered safe haven for terrorists, including Bin Laden. Even Clinton said that saddam was a threat and that he needed to be stopped.

As for michael Moore's 'documentary'(which it isn't, because a the definition of a documentary is: Presenting facts objectively without editorializing or inserting fictional matter, as in a book or film...just the opposite of what Moore does in his films). Moore dose not give the whole truth in his film. He gives only the one sided 'truths' designed not to give information about 9/11 and how it could have been stopped, but his 'truths' are designed to get Bush out of office.

 
i really support neither, but if i have to choose, kerry i guess

''Always read stuff that will make you look good if you die in the middle of it.''

P. J. O'Rourke
 
Hey yeah i thought we did find nuclear weapons being constructed. Wasn't there something with France giving Iraq something dealing with nuclear weapons. I dunno correct me if im wrong.

---------------------------------------------------------

Team Fresh
 
ATL, did you see Fahrenheit 9/11?

**********

'Families is where our nation finds hope, where wings take dream.'

'I understand small business growth. I was one'

-Dubya!
 
maybe we wouldnt have this problem if George Bush (not george walker bush) had taken care of saddam in the first gulf war. he didnt have the balls to go after him and kill him. just think about it, we wouldnt even be in iraq now if it werent for him

who watches the watchman?

slot machines made legal in Pennsylvania? next stop, the ninth level of HELL
 
Oh, and I understand the pain that Americans felt on Sept. 11th. I'd be pissed and want to kill some terrorists too if two planes crashed into the CN tower. Action was necessary, but frankly, what country REALLY harbors terrorists, for sure? Of what nationality was the overwhelming majority of the terrorists? They were from Saudi Arabia, not Iraq! And even you know why Saudi Arabia can't be attacked (you don't need to see the movie for that).

Bush is a lazy, incompetent jackass, who is merely a puppet of his dad's friends. Yes, Micheal Moore only showed one side of the story, and Saddam DID need to be considered, but honestly, they should of done that a while ago.

**********

'Families is where our nation finds hope, where wings take dream.'

'I understand small business growth. I was one'

-Dubya!
 
^ Yeah but Sadam funds these terroists. And i recall them cheering in the streets when the whole twin towers happened.

---------------------------------------------------------

Team Fresh
 
the ONE rocket shell with TRACES (READ: Non-Lethal Amount) was left over from the mid 90s (maybe even mid 80s, I forget which). So, you're saying it was OK to go to war when we find 1 single, no lethal, weapon. I would hardly call that a weapon of mass destruction. Hell even if it was, there is only one. No a good reason to go to war.

As for the terrorist connection, THERE ISN'T ONE WITH IRAQ. I fuckiong ahte it when all these ignorant little people are yelling IRAQ AND TERRORISM. There isn't a connection.

YES there are terrorists there now. NO there weren't anymore in taht country before the war then in most of teh middle east. Hell, Bush (even though he tried) couldn't find a connection, that's why he never said it was a reason for going.

-Pat Melvin

WBP|films

'Who's not 18 yet? What? LA LA LA LA LA LA! I can't hear you.' - Jay
 
No, I haven't seen farienheit 9/11. I haven't really had a chance. The only reason I would see it is bascially so I don't have to rely on things other people say, like in the article that I gave the link to. I also don't want to support Moore, so If anyone wants to give me $6 so I can see it, I'd be happy to take it.

 
Forgot this: The first Bush didn't kill saddam because the UN wouldn't allow him. George W. knew that Iraq was a threat to our security, and went on with the war becusae it's more important than UN support. Times changed between the 2 precidencies.(sp)

 
ATL, you are an idiot. The article you cited says the following, several times.

''But in Iraq, the U.S. military said trace amounts of the nerve agent found in a cache of rockets dating back to the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war were so deteriorated they would have had 'little to no impact'... But the U.S. military statement said: 'Due to the deteriorated state of the rounds, and small quantity of remaining agent, these rounds were determined to have limited to no impact if used by insurgents against coalition forces.'''

Secondly, while sarin nerve gas is a chemical weapon, it's hardly a WMD, and certainly not in the amounts found (in the entire country, they've found several usable litres in total)... where are the nuke-you-ler missiles that were supposedly being constructed with the centrifuges and yellow-cake uranium Bush told us they had? Oh, I forgot, he knew beforehand that the centrifuges weren't usable in the manufacturing of weapons, and that there was no such uranium; CIA reports said as much, and yet, he reported this.

For all the bitching you do about Moore 'spinning' the facts, the idea of going after every shady munition found in Iraq and shouting 'THERE! There! See, WMDs, just like he said!' is excessively hypocritical. You'd find worse by simply perusing some of Alabama's private weapons collections.

------------

In a haze

A stormy haze

I’ll be around

I’ll be loving you

Always

Always

Here I am

And I’ll take my time

Here I am

And I’ll wait in line

Always

Always...
 
^^^Coolcat, go see the movie. Saddam Hussein actually refused to communicate with the terrorists, who sent him messages.

And how can you blame them for dancing in the streets? The U.S had been bombing Iraq relentlessly before the war since the Gulf war! Plus, I heard that that was just footage that a news station re-used, but THAT's probably a rumour.

**********

'Families is where our nation finds hope, where wings take dream.'

'I understand small business growth. I was one'

-Dubya!
 
The fact is that there was a WMD by finding the sarin nerve gas, regardless of how much there was. There are pictures of Saddam's people, where they have been killed by WMD. They are there. We haven't searched the entire country, we just need to find them.

 
By the way, Melvs, I think you misspoke a bit there, when you said Bush never said it was a reason for going. I can give you a couple of dozen quotes where he (in no uncertain terms) connects Iraq to Al Qaeda, and, according to him and everyone in his administration, this alleged link, and the alleged WMDs, were the two major reasons for invading Iraq. During the war, members of the administration also said that while the liberation of Iraqis was a goal, it was not important enough to 'put American boys' lives at risk' for.

------------

In a haze

A stormy haze

I’ll be around

I’ll be loving you

Always

Always

Here I am

And I’ll take my time

Here I am

And I’ll wait in line

Always

Always...
 
Yeah, that makes sense, you idiot... if that much USELESS gas is enough to legitimize an invasion force from America, the rest of the world had better watch out. Are you even listening to yourself? You sound incredibly defensive of this administration rather than trying to logically put forward facts for useful debate... and it's a pretty weak defense.

------------

In a haze

A stormy haze

I’ll be around

I’ll be loving you

Always

Always

Here I am

And I’ll take my time

Here I am

And I’ll wait in line

Always

Always...
 
Oh, I've got an idea, ATL, listen: I respect that you're (apparently) a republican and a conservative, but seriously, don't you agree that Bush is a horrible leader who has made extremely bad decisions? Yes, the economy is going well, but tell me, is it because of certain measures taken by Bush...? No! Your country has the money and the potential to become much greater, don't you agree that your public schools, in general, are a dismal failure and that something needs to be done about it? Do you want your country to be regarded as 'a hobo land' of 'uneducated people'?

Give one term to Kerry to kick Bush out of the oval office, and in the next elections, if you aren't satisfied, vote Republican, for the new leader that will hopefully really represent your ideals. Unless your ideals are the current Bush administration's ones, in which case you really are a dumbass.

**********

'Families is where our nation finds hope, where wings take dream.'

'I understand small business growth. I was one'

-Dubya!
 
alright, I was a bit off of what I was trying to say. JD is correct, however, the WMD is NOT sarin nerve gas. it is NOT. Never will be either. You're a fucking idiot if you think it is. As already pointed out, the article you cited even says that. In plain english. are you that stupid?

-Pat Melvin

WBP|films

'Who's not 18 yet? What? LA LA LA LA LA LA! I can't hear you.' - Jay
 
canadian ski god, I think Bush has made some bad desisions, and I don't agreee with them. I agree with the war on Iraq, and anyhting to combat terrorism, beecause they have saved lives, and will continue saving lives.

Where did the article say that they weren't WMD? I don't see it. (I'm not talking about the sarin nerve gas, but the WMD found by the Polish) It also says that terrorists were trying to buy themn for $5000 each to use against us. the threat is there. Bush is doing what he can to eliminate it and keep us safe. I think all the liberals don't like Bush no matter what he does, because he's 'repuiblican' even though he holds some democratic ideals. He's damned if he doesn't, damned if he does.

 
^ did you even read the articles you posted? the first one is just a commentary and (like you claim moore's film to be) backed up by little or no facts. the second says 'But in Iraq, the U.S. military said trace amounts of the nerve agent found in a cache of rockets dating back to the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war were so deteriorated they would have had 'little to no impact if used by insurgents.''... meaning no, they did not have WMDs.

 
Whether or not they are useful now, they were very harmful at one point and are WMD. Saddam made some. He had the capabilities to make the. There are probably more. There is no use in trying to convince you people. this thread is going no where.

 
^convince me, what evidence do you have of this? oh that's right, none. I almost forgot, who gave the weapons to saddam during the iraq-iran war? hm....

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top