as much as id like to see it happen, somehow i don see the u.n. or anyone else for that matter going after an ex president of such an important player in international security.
first of all there were many countries involved in the war in iraq, so the blame cannot be given to one person nor one country for that matter, each was as dumb as the one that preceded it.
secondly, as much as i enjoy saying it bush was not a dictator like milosevic, milosovic can be held directly accountable for his actions, but the way the american system is set up with "advisors" the blame is almost impossible to be pinned on the president.
thirdly, bush will not stand trill for genocide, because what he did in iraq is not genocide, genocide is the systematic eradication of a group of people based on race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, nationality (basically the group has to have one single thing in common)(by systematic eradication i mean, planned discriminatory an organized killings of one group an one group alone) most of the civilian deaths in iraq have been caused by american bombings, an its a lil bit hard to discriminate from a plane. civilian deaths have occurred through the act of war, not through genocide (it sucks but it aint genocide)
btw in no way to i like or condone what bush has done, i think he's a douche, an our government is just as bad for playing follow the leader.
now back to the point of the thread.
if bush got impeached wouldn't this mean only good things for the republican party? in my opinion it'd give the party enough time to denounce an disassociate themselves with bush an the highly unpopular government he lead.
that way the conservative party can go on fear mongering the impressionable public an achieve a swing back to the right.
so ya now if you have read that whole rant i have a joke for you, seeing as milosevic was brought up before this is only appropriate
q) what do you say to a serbian hooker?
a) slobber-down-my-cock-you-bitch!!
