Burton pant sizing

6 foot? i would go at least a large. im 6 2 and an xl is baggy but not like, absurd.
 
no no, these are fitted pants. fitted people. so i dont want hella baggy, i want it just comfortably loose.
 
Burton has 3 fits this year, emo fit, standard, and team fit. emo fit is like tight (i dont know if anyone buys these lol) stnd is normal burton, and the team is new baggy line. idk why anyone wouldnt buy team fit its huuuge. whatever floats your boat i guess lol.
 
im buying these and im not and never have been emo. in fact, i plan to wear these witha "baller" jersey. blow your mind?

size 33 or 32 waist. idk if i trust the sizing chart really.
 
its funny I have just read a "sell out" thread then I see a thread where a skier wants burton.
 
im not saying your emo, but that type of pants is tight fit. it definetly doesnt go with a "baller" jersey, the two dont match. im not hating, but i think its gonna look weird. maybe im not explaining it right. here look at this, it shows the difference in the type of pants.http://www.burton.com/tech/#/stories/1/
 
yeah i agree. if your gonna want some sag/baggyness still at the bottom, go large. mediums is pretty damn short. sorry didnt realize they were fitted
 
Your a fuckin tool. Burton makes nice outerwear believe it or not, and you dont always have to 'support the industry' like all the cocksuckers on here say. Ski outerwear is shit, what do we have? like Saga (overpriced, impossible to get), Helly Hansen (rarely makes nice shit), Orage (there getting better), Oakley (constantly gets uglier every year. Burton always stays constant and pretty much always has nice shit to offer.
 
yeah i got burton pants and they definatly run small. Im 5"6 and I have medium and there pretty small. At least go large.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top