14445569:seanahue. said:BG scales with length:
177 at -9,
182 at -9.25
187 at -9.5
192 at -9.75
14445569:seanahue. said:BG scales with length:
177 at -9,
182 at -9.25
187 at -9.5
192 at -9.75
14445747:3mania said:that's a lot of nose out front.. are you even considering skiing or landing switch ? if so that's way far back. maybe like 1/2 of those measurements
14445747:3mania said:that's a lot of nose out front.. are you even considering skiing or landing switch ? if so that's way far back. maybe like 1/2 of those measurements
14445863:seanahue. said:If landing switch, the answer isn’t to mount a directional ski way forward, it’s to not get a directional ski in the first place, and get something more appropriate for that intended use.
For ON3P, if you’re skiing switch regularly, you should be on a Jeffrey / Mango.
You could probably pull a switch landing on a Woodsman, but less than ideal, and probably want to revert back to fwd quickly. BG / Wren are fully directional.
Sidecut for any shape performs best when mounted at recommended.
You can wiggle + / - 2cm from the line and generally be fine, but go further and you’re putting screws outside the binding mat - bad idea, if you like your bindings staying attached.
So to ski switch on a BG, your only choice is to mount at recommended, but backwards![]()
14445940:3mania said:If you're not planning on landing or skiing switch, WTF are you doing on this site? I haven't skied a pair of skis more than -3 in 15 years.
14445940:3mania said:If you're not planning on landing or skiing switch, WTF are you doing on this site? I haven't skied a pair of skis more than -3 in 15 years.
14445940:3mania said:If you're not planning on landing or skiing switch, WTF are you doing on this site? I haven't skied a pair of skis more than -3 in 15 years.
14446782:RudyGarmisch said:Try it sometime.
14447066:brianonym said:What is the mount point of the 118 and how far forward would be too far forward?
14445725:tri_photo said:mount core center