Big Sky or Aspen

I Live i MT. and I would much rather be skiing in CO. There isn't much to do in Big Sky and the overall skiing in Big Sky is over rated

 
if your only going to be at the resort aspin, but there is soooo much sick back country around big sky. Big ski also has a shit load of rocks, i totaly destroyed my skis in one year, missing edge and lots of core shots

AK
 
just found out i get access to like 4 other mountains with the aspen deal, definately doing that

www.two5eight.tk
 
i've been to both... the skiing at big sky is pretty killer but the nightlife at big sky is non-existant where are aspen has some killer skiing also, better park, and a sick nightlife (if you can afford it hahaha). i would definitely say aspen

 
ya bring like 5000 spending money for a week

--------------------------------- ------------------------------------

"What the world doesn't understand," says Craven, still zigzagging through the parking lot, "is that what we don't have enough of is cold, not heat."

Some people talk it, some people live it, some people walk it-some people give it... deal with it.

D-Loc AKA Shaky Bones... Original, Unique, and One of a Kind.
 
That's like picking between apples and oranges. Aspen is the ultimate megaresort with everything you could ever ask for. It has a kick ass park and good terrain. But one the down side it is probably the yuppiest resort in the country and it gets super crowded. Big Sky has sweet terrain and an okay park but it's never very crowded and there is a cool vibe there.

I think rails in general are just a phase. - Anthony Boronowski

*NWFT*
 
Deff Aspen there are no line with an average of two skiers per acre four montians on one pass. twice the night life and dont worry about the stereotypes aspen is so chill and fun and its not as expensive as its made out to be.

 
big sky is not tight unless the tram is open and they have alot of snow...which isn't alot. aspen is sick regardless of snow conditions b/c of the park.

 
Back
Top