Man, people really misinterpreted that I guess.  To clarify- I only meant to say that park skiing doesn't require the same type of technical skiing ability that pipe does.  I never meant to claim that park skiing isn't real skiing, just that it is a specific type of skiing with a specific set of skills.
It's a fact that you don't have to be a technically awesome skier to go through a park line, it's also a fact that you don't have to be a sick rail skier to kill a gs course, and you don't have to be able to do a switch 10 to kill a backcountry line.  It's still all skiing, there are just different sets of skills involved in each side of the sport.
If I say "Girl ski racers are the best girls at making technical high speed turns on ice" That statement doesn't mean I am shit-talking all of the freeride girls, or claiming that anything other than racing isn't real skiing.
Personally I chose Sarah as "best girl skier" because I thought she was the most well rounded girl skier out there.  She has skills in lots of different areas of the sport.
I disputed Asian's claim that Kaya would dominate pipe skiing, because I think that with their backgrounds, some of the current pipe girls (Sarah, Davina, etc) are stronger technical skiers, and that comes into play a lot more for pipe than it does for slopestyle.
Apparently Allen thinks I was also insulting rollerblading and minnesota, not sure how that happened.
Yes, I did say that SOME park-only kids can't perform great technical turns, but so what?  If I said mogul skiers would totally suck in a world cup downhill race, are they going to get their panties in a bunch?
I never dissed Kaya at all, or park skiers (I'm primarily a park skier these days), just saying that park skiing takes a pretty specialized set of skiing skills. Whereas other sides of the sport rely more on different skiing skills.
It is all "skiing" whether you are doing park pipe moguls racing bc etc.