13664327:East_Coaster said:
I know what you mean and i know you pick boot flex on your ability but I don't see weight as being the biggest issue. A flex of say 120 puts your weight over your skis more than an 80. Now hopefully you all know why this can be a good and bad thing. The good thing is your more forward and able to control skis in hardpack and icy conditions. This boot just doesn't perform the same way in powder. You can't get as far back on your tails as you would with a softer flex. It's just simple physics. I agree that a 120 flex is better though in most cases because like everyone's pointed out is the shin bang. But there's a median to the flex and a little bit around. For instance, some people may go with a 110 or a 130 opposed to a 130 due to their ability. Ski flexes aren't set in stone.
The same boot does not put all people in the correct position for skiing. Therefore, some beginners need to be super high performance boots while others do not. Some park skiers will be in world cup race boots while others will not. Simply because you are "X" skier, it does not mean you take "X" boot.
What I am saying is that you do not and should not pick a boot based on your skiing ability. This is because not everyone has the same biomechanics and therefore needs different things for their body and that trumps where and how they ski on the mountain. If everyone had the same biomechanics and subjective build, then yes we could choose boots based on ability. But that is clearly not what happens.
The right flex is the one that is right for YOU. If you are a beginner who weighs 100 pounds soaking wet, you will require a boot that is softer than the beginner who weighs 200 pounds. If you have ever tried to fit an overweight beginner, then you will instantly see that a "beginner" boot is absolutely the wrong boot for them.
The right flex is the one that matches your weight, your height, your strength, your ankle flexibility, and lastly and least based on your personal preference. If you personally like soft boots but you have a limited ankle range of motion, then you are setting yourself up for utter pain and discomfort by a choosing a softer flexing boot. If you personally like super stiff boots but you can't properly flex a 130, you are also setting yourself up for pain and discomfort. The reason is the boot doesn't match your subjective, biomechanical needs.
13664351:East_Coaster said:
Shins are in the tongue but race boots are more stiff dude. You can't be serious? There is a difference between race boots and freeride boots. Have you tried a pair of race boots then freeride? For one, there's weight and then there's stiffness. So boots are based of other boots. That doesn't mean they're an exact replica of that boot.
Historically, "freeride" boots were simply race boots that were colored differently- no change whatsoever. If you look at freeride athletes over the last 20 years, 99% of them are in race boots because they want the stiffness and stability that race boots provide. Today, however, freeride is quickly becoming freeride touring, so race boots will not suitably meet their needs: race boots lack tech inserts, a rockered rubber sole, and a walk mode. The goal of a modern freeride touring boot is to offer the same skiing performance and foothold of a race boot, but with the features I mentioned. If it can also be light, that is a bonus.